|
online friend posted:http://arstechnica.com/apple/2016/06/digging-into-the-dev-documentation-for-apfs-apples-new-file-system/ Your file system is a piece of poo poo. Apple should have licensed NTFS.
|
#
¿
Jun 17, 2016 12:31
|
|
|
|
| # ¿ May 10, 2024 03:51 |
|
|
maniacdevnull posted:lol that they didn't follow thru on zfs because oracle is loving toxic zfs is trash for Linux
|
|
#
¿
Jun 17, 2016 14:46
|
|
|
ntfs is so good
|
|
#
¿
Jun 17, 2016 15:14
|
|
|
ntfs is the worlds best file system
|
|
#
¿
Jun 17, 2016 15:20
|
|
|
NTFS is by far the best file system. everything else is garbage for Linux.
|
|
#
¿
Jun 17, 2016 15:26
|
|
|
Captain Foo posted:why is ntfs better than ext4 for every reason. its just better at everything
|
|
#
¿
Jun 17, 2016 15:36
|
|
|
same difference
|
|
#
¿
Jun 17, 2016 18:14
|
|
|
whats really good is NTFS. it all the most useful features built in
|
|
#
¿
Jun 17, 2016 18:15
|
|
|
because they want it to work
|
|
#
¿
Jun 17, 2016 19:25
|
|
|
knowing apples history that's probably a bad assumption on my part
|
|
#
¿
Jun 17, 2016 19:25
|
|
|
lol @ a bunch of Linux losers hating on ntfs. go back to your hosed up file systems that don't even have working permissions, let alone auditing, encryption, or compression.
|
|
#
¿
Jun 17, 2016 19:34
|
|
|
NTFS is better than ext4 because ext4 was designed with Linux and the limitations of Linux in mind.
|
|
#
¿
Jun 17, 2016 20:35
|
|
|
the way permissions work is correct because each item needs a security descriptor otherwise the client has to compute it from parent descriptors every time. also sounds like you've got a bad setup or something cause I've never had a problem w/ ntfs or file shares. Also wrt the home directories you are doing it really wrong somehow. you've got a shared drive and each folder is somehow flagged as a my documents link (which is a special link) instead of being a regular folder. Ive never seen user homes implemented in a way that would do what you're seeing.
|
|
#
¿
Jun 17, 2016 20:41
|
|
|
a real good way to do user homes nowadays is to mount a vhd for it from the network.
|
|
#
¿
Jun 17, 2016 20:42
|
|
|
Nope. NTFS is the best
|
|
#
¿
Jun 17, 2016 21:04
|
|
|
atomicthumbs posted:i'm talking about plugging it into a windows computer and having permissions issues despite an admin account because oh no, the users folder is owned by the account on the other computer! click here to take loving forever taking ownership of everything and maybe some things still won't work why would an administrator local to one computer be able to access to files of a local administrator on another computer? that would be insecure and stupid.
|
|
#
¿
Jun 19, 2016 19:32
|
|
|
error1 posted:"NTFS is the best" you can use any open sores file system with windows but you never would because they are all garbage for idiots stuck on Linux
|
|
#
¿
Jun 19, 2016 19:32
|
|
|
Linux users: "you cant, like, own data man. security is bad!"
|
|
#
¿
Jun 19, 2016 19:36
|
|
|
there are dynamic ACLs now but I haven't really looked into it. you're always going to need some kind of descriptors on the object otherwise theres no way to know how to secure it.
|
|
#
¿
Jun 24, 2016 16:50
|
|
|
|
| # ¿ May 10, 2024 03:51 |
|
|
BangersInMyKnickers posted:sure but if you're trying to do a mass permissions change its absolutely painful to touch every single object when you could just be defining it on a parent object and then when you access an object have it parse the local ACLs and then the parent objects for anything that should be propagating to it. a db of folder hierarchy and permissions could do that, while leaving the clutter of individual file ACLs local to the object. would add a small amount of overhead to normal access but worth the trade-off when it comes to administrative tasks and who really cares about a bit of extra latency for some shared departmental drive.
|
|
#
¿
Jun 24, 2016 17:51
|
|