|
The 360' upskirt shots seem a bit creepy to me.
|
# ? Aug 21, 2016 21:32 |
|
|
# ? May 4, 2024 20:10 |
|
I think he's going for down blouse too with those high up cameras
|
# ? Aug 21, 2016 23:13 |
I once went out and took some random shots of my dog and a family friends' dog together just for fun. I sent her the pictures of her dog after I was done in post. "They were so amazing! Thank you so much!! My daughter showed me how to crop them so [dog] is in the middle of every frame!!!"
|
|
# ? Aug 22, 2016 00:50 |
|
Backstory? Reverse GIS isn't helping.
|
# ? Aug 22, 2016 01:00 |
|
BlackMK4 posted:Backstory? Reverse GIS isn't helping. It is clearly Kojima putting himself in MGS/getting Quiet's tits just right/putting a baby in Norman Reedus.
|
# ? Aug 22, 2016 01:20 |
|
HookShot posted:
This every time. Along with the most gaudy instagram filters turned to 11
|
# ? Aug 22, 2016 02:15 |
|
BANME.sh posted:This every time. Along with the most gaudy instagram filters turned to 11 I really love these photos I saw on the internet, can you do stuff like this? <links to hideous pastel tone-mapped HDR monstrosities>
|
# ? Aug 22, 2016 04:01 |
|
Look at all these old fogeys who simply cannot accept the modern aesthetic of instagram and HDR.
|
# ? Aug 22, 2016 07:07 |
|
3D scanning rig?
|
# ? Aug 22, 2016 15:10 |
|
The XKCD Larper posted:3D scanning rig? I was thinking that too, but don't those rigs usually have purpose built cameras specifically made for the job? Using off the shelf DSLR's just seems like overkill and would drive the price way up, since 90% of what they can do wouldn't be needed for that type of scanning.
|
# ? Aug 22, 2016 15:21 |
|
Bloody Hedgehog posted:I was thinking that too, but don't those rigs usually have purpose built cameras specifically made for the job?
|
# ? Aug 22, 2016 15:27 |
|
It looks like a matrix style slow motion pan setup to me, though the space is pretty small. Maybe they'll throw a musician in there and have them pretend to sing a song for their video?
|
# ? Aug 22, 2016 17:19 |
|
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DbPxvBbZAhs
|
# ? Aug 22, 2016 19:15 |
|
Ah, so I was almost right: the lower cameras are for 360' underboob shots.
|
# ? Aug 22, 2016 19:40 |
|
Yep, let's not get a purpose made setup for this rig, where we can use dumb lens-and-sensor cams that can be adjusted all from a computer. Sit tight Stef, it'll only be two or three hours before we set up all these DSLR's individually.
|
# ? Aug 22, 2016 20:03 |
|
A place near me has a room setup like that to do 3D scans for printing cake toppers and trophies. It's pretty cool actually. I took some press kit photos for them for their grand opening last year, I thought it was kinda funny that the owners have a 50 Nikon DSLRs but nothing that isn't screwed to the wall for stuff like that.
|
# ? Aug 22, 2016 20:21 |
|
thank you i do have a really good camera
|
# ? Aug 23, 2016 05:44 |
|
Twenties Superstar posted:thank you i do have a really good camera
|
# ? Aug 23, 2016 06:12 |
|
Sure, I'll take your pics for "free". I'll have to take my day rate in trade though. So you'll be coming over to mow my lawn for the next year, right? Wait... where are you going?!
|
# ? Aug 23, 2016 07:57 |
|
oh god that reminds me, I got this about a month and a half ago from an old college friend "Hey! Really far in advance, but are you going to be around in October or November? And are you willing to drive down to Wooster? [fiancee] and I want to take our engagement photos in Wooster in the fall, so I was wondering if you would be willing to do that? We'll buy you dinner :-)" They're great friends but that is nearly a 3 hour drive each way and in no drat way am I killing an entire day and taking engagement photos for a $15 dinner. She's working on her dissertation so her fiancee is the only breadwinner right now and I know he's not making a lot so I can understand cash is tight. We eventually agreed on a fairly low rate where I'll basically break even for my expenses and time because I do want to help them out, but jesus.
|
# ? Aug 23, 2016 12:09 |
|
DJExile posted:oh god that reminds me, I got this about a month and a half ago from an old college friend Remember to get some paper trail for that and deduct your mileage by the IRS rate (87.5 cpm IIRC) if you are filing as a freelancer. That will offset whatever losses you take in gas/car wear.
|
# ? Aug 23, 2016 13:40 |
|
I have a special appreciation for cellphone cameras. Their minimum focusing distance is usually pretty generous, and Sony makes Apple's camera sensors so I'm cool with that. Plus, Polarr is basically lightroom for iOS
|
# ? Aug 26, 2016 15:30 |
|
There's also, you know, Lightroom for iphones.
|
# ? Aug 26, 2016 20:45 |
|
Which is actually a really good app, as long as you never once play around with the mobilesync feature because it's crippled garbage that does absolutely nothing you would reasonably expect a cloud service to do. But the photo editing part is good!
|
# ? Aug 26, 2016 20:54 |
|
thanks for the food blog post
|
# ? Aug 27, 2016 00:46 |
|
xzzy posted:Which is actually a really good app, as long as you never once play around with the mobilesync feature because it's crippled garbage that does absolutely nothing you would reasonably expect a cloud service to do. Every time I open lightroom it tells me something about mobile sync being disabled and every time I'm like I dont give a gently caress. TBH I didn't even know what it was until this thread. Adobe pushing stupid poo poo I don't need.
|
# ? Aug 30, 2016 19:37 |
|
bobmarleysghost posted:There's also, you know, Lightroom for iphones. The Lightroom app is really underwhelming in comparison. Having access to a tone curve on mobile was what sold it for me.
|
# ? Aug 30, 2016 21:36 |
|
Awkward Davies posted:Every time I open lightroom it tells me something about mobile sync being disabled and every time I'm like I dont give a gently caress. TBH I didn't even know what it was until this thread. Adobe pushing stupid poo poo I don't need. Adobe can't comprehend why someone would decline their half baked sync solution so figures you just missed the dialog box the past 100 times you clicked past it.
|
# ? Aug 30, 2016 21:41 |
|
It might make sense if Lightroom mobile didn't completely suck and get outclassed by a number of other photo editing apps.
|
# ? Aug 30, 2016 22:00 |
|
rio posted:It might make sense if Lightroom mobile didn't completely suck and get outclassed by a number of other photo editing apps. I'm only now starting to rely more on my phone and tablet for some on the go editing, as my S7 can shoot raw. What apps do you recommend?
|
# ? Aug 31, 2016 01:00 |
|
Did they scan her rear end in that way too, or just pay someone off of deviant art to model it?
|
# ? Aug 31, 2016 01:16 |
|
Thank you, Dorkroom, for being different than the local Facebook "professional photography" groups I've joined. Today's most popular thread: post a photo straight out of camera without any editing because clearly that's the hallmark of a good photographer -- having in-camera jpgs that look "right"
|
# ? Aug 31, 2016 02:27 |
|
I was on a photo walk once, and at one point someone who had a D800 said "... Raw? What's that?"
|
# ? Aug 31, 2016 02:34 |
|
beneatsfood posted:The Lightroom app is really underwhelming in comparison. Having access to a tone curve on mobile was what sold it for me. The lightroom app has tone curve Straight from the horse's mouth
|
# ? Aug 31, 2016 02:51 |
|
real apps have curves
|
# ? Aug 31, 2016 02:55 |
|
Presumably the selling point would be for you to be able to edit a bunch of photos in your main catalogue while doing menial real life things like commuting to work or attending a family funeral. But does it actually work like that?
|
# ? Aug 31, 2016 06:42 |
|
dakana posted:Thank you, Dorkroom, for being different than the local Facebook "professional photography" groups I've joined. I got kicked out of a photography group for asking someone if his photos were taken with a phone. The admin told me we can't hurt each other's self esteem, and that criticism should only be given when explicitly asked.
|
# ? Aug 31, 2016 07:47 |
|
Someone recently asked me what I did to get "that old film look" Idk, shot old film?
|
# ? Aug 31, 2016 10:51 |
|
KinkyJohn posted:Presumably the selling point would be for you to be able to edit a bunch of photos in your main catalogue while doing menial real life things like commuting to work or attending a family funeral. But does it actually work like that? Yes, I upload a shoot and then do the rough cull while menially commuting to work - swiping photos in and out like one is browsing Tinder. I don't think it is really designed to be a true "photos in the cloud" solution. I feel it's more a companion app to Lightroom on your desktop and in that sense it works well, rather than a standalone editing app.
|
# ? Aug 31, 2016 12:13 |
|
|
# ? May 4, 2024 20:10 |
|
Bloody Hedgehog posted:I was on a photo walk once, and at one point someone who had a D800 said "... Raw? What's that?" Cool 'I met Ken Rockwell' story.
|
# ? Aug 31, 2016 12:17 |