|
Do you think sometime in the future we'll just have a chip implanted in our brains that we can mentally maneuver to do everything a smart phone can do today? Kramer was right. Phones in our heads. It's coming. It'll look like this.
|
# ? Sep 11, 2016 06:23 |
|
|
# ? May 3, 2024 02:20 |
|
They already have this.
|
# ? Sep 11, 2016 06:24 |
|
So yes this is going to happen but we need to make sure that we don't leave oily fingerprints on Molly's eyepiece. Get your priorities straight.
|
# ? Sep 11, 2016 06:26 |
|
just as long as I can jack in to the JACKOSPHERE and stream porno straight to my JACKIN' HAND then I'm in.
|
# ? Sep 11, 2016 06:26 |
|
I too use my phone to look at pictures of mostly eyeballs
|
# ? Sep 11, 2016 06:27 |
|
I have a chip implanted in my dick that I manipulate to do basic smartphone functions, coincidentally I'm not allowed within 1000 feet of schools
|
# ? Sep 11, 2016 06:35 |
|
It'll be too risky to implant in your brain, so they'll have to do it in your pinky (least valuable) finger, so you'll have to stick your pinky in your ear to listen. Might even talk into your thumb.
|
# ? Sep 11, 2016 06:41 |
|
Stalizard posted:I have a chip implanted in my dick that I manipulate to do basic smartphone functions, coincidentally I'm not allowed within 1000 feet of schools
|
# ? Sep 11, 2016 06:48 |
|
Stalizard posted:I have a chip implanted in my dick that I manipulate to do basic smartphone functions, coincidentally I'm not allowed within 1000 feet of schools lol don't even act like that restriction wasn't already in place before you were chipped, Jared.
|
# ? Sep 11, 2016 06:49 |
|
Iron Prince posted:lol don't even act like that restriction wasn't already in place before you were chipped, Jared. The only thing worse than a Jared is a Boner named Kevin, and that is you my friend.
|
# ? Sep 11, 2016 06:51 |
|
Cordon bleu posted:The only thing worse than a Jared is a Boner named Kevin, and that is you my friend.
|
# ? Sep 11, 2016 06:52 |
|
Iron Prince posted:lol don't even act like that restriction wasn't already in place before you were chipped, Jared.
|
# ? Sep 11, 2016 06:53 |
|
Not in our lifetime. Even a high tech contact lense is unrealistic in our lifetime. But eventually apple will release their version of google glass and we'll all switch to hud style phone interfaces.
|
# ? Sep 11, 2016 06:56 |
|
Moon Atari posted:Not in our lifetime. Even a high tech contact lense is unrealistic in our lifetime. But eventually apple will release their version of google glass and we'll all switch to hud style phone interfaces. What about the people with epilepsy that already have computers in their heads and the mutants that the military has been covering up for decades (centuries, millennia) what about that though?
|
# ? Sep 11, 2016 06:59 |
|
In the future, phones will be so small that they will be implanted inside prosthetic testicles. However, it will take balls to do this.
|
# ? Sep 11, 2016 07:04 |
|
Moon Atari posted:Not in our lifetime. Even a high tech contact lense is unrealistic in our lifetime. But eventually apple will release their version of google glass and we'll all switch to hud style phone interfaces. The internet just recently started. And you are questioning google glass? Prosthetics? Penis implants.
|
# ? Sep 11, 2016 07:05 |
|
In the future, phones won't have headphone jacks.
|
# ? Sep 11, 2016 07:07 |
|
Ein cooler Typ posted:In the future, phones won't have headphone jacks. You sick monster.
|
# ? Sep 11, 2016 07:13 |
|
The chip that's going to go in your brain is going to be this Apple MFi authorization chip hanging out in the lower-left cable:
|
# ? Sep 11, 2016 07:15 |
|
Mechanical interaction with the brain is very difficult and we are currently at an extremely primitive stage of technology. Most implants for epilepsy actually work via electrical stimulation of cranial nerves, achieving nothing more than a blast of neural activity to disrupt a seizure, and the majority are not even implanted in the brain. Meaningfully interacting, such that we can produce an artificial sensory experience that would overlay our actual sensory experience, requires such technological advances that it is difficult to even come up with a hard scifi style technobabble explanation with any basis in existing tech. A pretty large amount of the brain is dedicated to visual perception. You'd have to be contacting all or a lot of those neurons to produce something meaningful. If we assume it is some sort of nanotech metal implant it would have to be guided into direct or near direct contact with all those neurons, without damaging them or surrounding material. This is made extra complicated by the fact that each brain's layout is actually fairly unique, so it would also need to test the individual's response to stimulating clusters of neurons. Currently we can't even open the skull without causing some damage, let alone probe visual processing in detail. As to the state of nanotech, we are nowhere near even manufacturing contact lenses with a detailed screen in them, let alone being able to connect the lenses to an input device wirelessly. The best we can hope for is glasses and maybe that vibration based audio stimulation.
|
# ? Sep 11, 2016 07:26 |
|
http://www.cnn.com/2013/08/28/health/brain-interface/quote:Mind control? Brain controls brain in new demonstration
|
# ? Sep 11, 2016 07:36 |
|
Moon Atari posted:Mechanical interaction with the brain is very difficult and we are currently at an extremely primitive stage of technology. Most implants for epilepsy actually work via electrical stimulation of cranial nerves, achieving nothing more than a blast of neural activity to disrupt a seizure, and the majority are not even implanted in the brain. Meaningfully interacting, such that we can produce an artificial sensory experience that would overlay our actual sensory experience, requires such technological advances that it is difficult to even come up with a hard scifi style technobabble explanation with any basis in existing tech. I'm getting a memory chip implanted in my brain for my courier job.
|
# ? Sep 11, 2016 07:42 |
|
Moon Atari posted:Mechanical interaction with the brain is very difficult and we are currently at an extremely primitive stage of technology. Most implants for epilepsy actually work via electrical stimulation of cranial nerves, achieving nothing more than a blast of neural activity to disrupt a seizure, and the majority are not even implanted in the brain. Meaningfully interacting, such that we can produce an artificial sensory experience that would overlay our actual sensory experience, requires such technological advances that it is difficult to even come up with a hard scifi style technobabble explanation with any basis in existing tech. Ya but it's on wifi with my telephone and vibrates during aura patterns and undergrads made this in Australia, the medication regime is not as intensive as it was before and only needs to be done as an immediate prophylaxis .
|
# ? Sep 11, 2016 07:44 |
|
Moon Atari posted:Mechanical interaction with the brain is very difficult and we are currently at an extremely primitive stage of technology. Most implants for epilepsy actually work via electrical stimulation of cranial nerves, achieving nothing more than a blast of neural activity to disrupt a seizure, and the majority are not even implanted in the brain. Meaningfully interacting, such that we can produce an artificial sensory experience that would overlay our actual sensory experience, requires such technological advances that it is difficult to even come up with a hard scifi style technobabble explanation with any basis in existing tech.
|
# ? Sep 11, 2016 07:46 |
|
So that kook that google employs called Ray Kurzweil sure played a lot of second life and internet foram... he also has a very accessible voice mail.
|
# ? Sep 11, 2016 07:47 |
|
Magnetic mind control works in live animals, makes mice happy
|
# ? Sep 11, 2016 07:55 |
|
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eJyMEkb_8to
|
# ? Sep 11, 2016 07:57 |
|
tDSC and TMS both have (at absolute best) about as much fidelity as poking a finger into a brain, with fantasies of improving the ability to target specific areas beyond slight increases cockblocked by physical laws of electromagnetism. The future will be mostly the same with slightly better gadgets, except for where it sucks in ways we didn't predict. Videogames might get better graphics, but at the cost of gameplay. You will die a few years before life extending technology becomes available. Your children, should you have them, will mostly view your death as an inconvenience.
|
# ? Sep 11, 2016 08:07 |
|
Cell phone wifi is bad. Information dissemination is bad. China and India do not exist. There is no such thing as angel investors and venture capitalists are all evil people because they ditched my mom.
|
# ? Sep 11, 2016 08:09 |
|
Actually there will be no phones in the future. Just as we're on the cusp of the ultimate phone, we'll run out of rare earth ores and the world will be plunged into chaos and barbarism.
|
# ? Sep 11, 2016 18:22 |
|
Elon's Musk got you hot and bothered or something AppleWhite?
|
# ? Sep 11, 2016 18:24 |
|
In the future we will never be bored, but neither will we ever be truly satisfied.
|
# ? Sep 11, 2016 18:59 |
|
Pawn 17 posted:I'm getting a memory chip implanted in my brain for my courier job. Please tell me you didn't erase your childhood for extra storage space?
|
# ? Sep 11, 2016 19:24 |
|
Will the phone in my brain remind me not to poo poo my pants?
|
# ? Sep 11, 2016 20:10 |
|
autoaim.cfg posted:Please tell me you didn't erase your childhood for extra storage space? Well yeah, but I was told I could get my memories back at any time. I mean, I can... can't I?
|
# ? Sep 11, 2016 20:14 |
|
Nooner posted:Will the phone in my brain remind me not to poo poo my pants? Yes, isn't the future amazing
|
# ? Sep 11, 2016 21:10 |
|
Nooner posted:Will the phone in my brain remind me not to poo poo my pants? no but your pager might
|
# ? Sep 11, 2016 23:35 |
|
So glad I'm going to be dead in around 60 years or sooner
|
# ? Sep 12, 2016 00:23 |
|
|
# ? Sep 12, 2016 00:31 |
|
|
# ? May 3, 2024 02:20 |
|
interwhat posted:So glad I'm going to be dead in around 60 years or sooner so is everybody else
|
# ? Sep 12, 2016 02:48 |