Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
 
  • Locked thread
kvx687
Dec 29, 2009

Soiled Meat
The identity of the killer is obvious now- multiple kills committed by a trusted aide? The culprit is Yasu! I think this might even be a timely reference, when was the Portopia Serial Murder Case released?

grandalt posted:

Battler, Battler, Battler. If there is no witch, than the people you thought you knew you don't. You have to be willing to say that either a family member or a servant is the killer or else you have lost before you have begun.

Actually Beatrice herself provided a workaround for that- human(?)Beatrice is a nineteenth guest this time around, so Battler's trying to pin this on her.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

kvx687
Dec 29, 2009

Soiled Meat

ProfessorProf posted:

Remember that there were three ingots of gold present at the First Twilight in EP2.

That doesn't necessarily mean anything; Beatrice could have provided it herself, or if it was valid then it could be all that remains of a once-great fortune. All the three bars prove is that three bars of gold exists- and that Beatrice wants us to think there are more. It would be pretty crushingly ironic to go through all that and discover that nothing was left of the fortune that prompted so much intrigue in the first place.

  • Locked thread