Which was more embarrassing? This poll is closed. |
|||
---|---|---|---|
The Debate | 32 | 14.81% | |
MNF | 8 | 3.70% | |
Donald's Hair | 12 | 5.56% | |
Six Pickspatrick | 48 | 22.22% | |
The Texans | 50 | 23.15% | |
Whatever's about to happen to the Bills. | 37 | 17.13% | |
Print the Shirts | 29 | 13.43% | |
Total: | 216 votes |
|
Kalli posted:Wentz is good until he isn't. Wentz looks like a much more polished product than RG3 ever was. Wentz is playing like a pro out of the pocket, RG3's rookie season was made up of unicorns, rainbows and fantastic feats of athleticism.
|
# ¿ Sep 27, 2016 16:30 |
|
|
# ¿ May 12, 2024 03:24 |
|
CANNIBAL GIRLS posted:Have there been any cases of an otherwise HOF bound QB having several great seasons and then suddenly, without an injury, turning to poo poo? He wasn't HOF bound, but McNair fell off a cliff pretty quickly... and then uh, well fell on a bullet I guess.
|
# ¿ Sep 27, 2016 16:35 |
|
You can't rush back back problems, err wait you can't rush back with back problems. Hmm that's not it. You can't come back to back problems when... damnit no. back
|
# ¿ Sep 28, 2016 14:33 |
|
I feel pretty strongly that the Bills will win this.
|
# ¿ Sep 28, 2016 14:42 |
|
fsif posted:I hate the biannual ritual of Bill Belichick heaping effusive praise on my trash rear end team. Meanwhile, upstate... http://abcnews.go.com/Sports/rex-ryan-pokes-fun-patriots-bill-belichick-impression/story?id=42397336&yptr=yahoo
|
# ¿ Sep 28, 2016 14:43 |
|
With that name? No thanks.
|
# ¿ Sep 28, 2016 14:45 |
|
commy gun posted:Mass name changes are fun. New feature: Now pay $50 to change your awful new name!
|
# ¿ Sep 28, 2016 15:58 |
|
fsif posted:I get that this would be a very Rex game to win, but I can't really picture a scenario for Bills victory. Maybe Rex is able to flummox Garappolo with some weird coverages, but based on the Bills past history with him, Blount is drat near guaranteed two touchdowns and 7 YPC. I think Garappolo is going to play, but he's going to be very limited and they'll try to lean on the run game. The Bills are giving up around 98/ypg on the ground, which isn't particular good or bad. They should do better if New England is somewhat one dimensional, which I expect them to be. The struggle for the Bills will be to score, as you said with Watkins out New England will be able to focus all their effort on shutting down McCoy. That being said, this is the fourth game without Brady and it just feels like it's time for the "magic Belichick makes backup QBs great" trope to die an ugly death. And the Ryans would be the perfect dudes for it to happen against.
|
# ¿ Sep 28, 2016 16:25 |
|
Ehud posted:We already had an awful offensive line and LB corps before this game and now we are going to be down 2 more linemen and 2 more LB's in this game After MNF the Saints now hold that honor. By 2 yards per game more.
|
# ¿ Sep 28, 2016 16:29 |
|
GaussianCopula posted:I'd rather have some idiot from sports radio (or Bill Simms) take care of the jokes while our head coach is busy preparing the team to go 4-0. But that's just me. dude
|
# ¿ Sep 28, 2016 22:19 |
|
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JFfmR7q77Mg
|
# ¿ Sep 28, 2016 22:21 |
|
sharknado slashfic posted:Wait this is ok to say now? Christ probably wasn't gay.
|
# ¿ Sep 29, 2016 12:58 |
|
CyberPingu posted:Or Bon Jovi... Bon Jovi is more of a Jersey guy. I mean, he had that whole album and everything.
|
# ¿ Sep 29, 2016 15:56 |
|
Kalli posted:Seriously, how hard would it be to roll up on the NBA and poach away some of their fan engagement people? They have bigger problems now. http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2016/09/29/why-is-tv-viewership-down/ Perhaps we've finally found the issue that could remove the golden commissioner.
|
# ¿ Sep 29, 2016 19:36 |
|
The Browns.
|
# ¿ Sep 29, 2016 22:47 |
|
Kalli posted:Huh, you know, usually NFL contract TRADE ideas have no prayer of working due to cap space and accelerated dead money and the age of the players involved. A 1st still seems high for a non-QB on the wrong side of 30.
|
# ¿ Sep 30, 2016 21:47 |
|
Unless they plan on drafting a franchise quarterback next season, keeping Thomas on the roster is really, really dumb. He is not going to be in this team's long term future, so trade him while he's still near peak value. If they keep him for next two years they will have squandered his trade value for what? To protect a few garbo quarterbacks during more rebuilding/losing seasons?Nissin Cup Nudist posted:Only a contender would pay a premium for Thomas but what contender has a massive whole at LT in the first place? Seahawks, Vikings, Panthers.
|
# ¿ Sep 30, 2016 22:00 |
|
Kalli posted:That said, one has to presume that with the failed RG3 experiment, the nothings they have behind him and the utter despair that is the rest of their roster, that they will be drafting a quarterback next year. So in that sense, it makes sense to keep JT around, because, if he's happy with losing, having your rookie QB be able to stand in a nice pocket makes development a hell of a lot easier, just ask the Cowboys or Broncos this year. I mostly agree if they are going to go hard after a real franchise QB. But the thing is what is more valuable to a team attempting to rebuild: Two years of good left tackle play under a veteran contract? -OR- A first round pick?
|
# ¿ Sep 30, 2016 22:07 |
|
Kalli posted:I agree they should stockpile picks, but at the same time, if Joe Thomas is really the mythological story we've been told who is happy in Cleveland and just wants to build a winner, then trading him could actually be significantly damaging to the locker room culture there, and that's gotta be a fragile loving place as is. Locker room culture is the least of the Browns' problems. Lack of talent and depth is a bigger problem. More picks solve that problem. Smart teams get rid of players while they're still valuable assets. The Browns should make the smart - if unpopular - move here.
|
# ¿ Sep 30, 2016 22:12 |
|
I think Gronk's drug of choice is flavored vodka.
|
# ¿ Sep 30, 2016 23:45 |
|
https://twitter.com/nyjets/status/781900654591827969
|
# ¿ Oct 1, 2016 00:38 |
|
For real AFCE Incest https://twitter.com/ProFootballTalk/status/782316235732029440
|
# ¿ Oct 2, 2016 00:30 |
|
I think he was actually the smart one.
|
# ¿ Oct 2, 2016 00:40 |
|
So drawing from the transitive nature of football obviously the Eagles would drop 70+ points if they played the Chiefs.
|
# ¿ Oct 3, 2016 16:49 |
|
My understanding is that Ryan and Roman disagreed over how to use Tyrod - Ryan wanted to feature his athleticism more. Also Roman reportedly said Rex was a buffoon who was going to ruin Roman's career.
|
# ¿ Oct 3, 2016 20:18 |
|
go go go go ROSCOE! posted:Quinn would be a huge idiot to let Coleman play considering there's precedence with Clark Dan Quinn looks like the kind of guy who doesn't listen to a bunch of pinheads about "medical science" and "risk management".
|
# ¿ Oct 3, 2016 20:38 |
|
Dan Quinn looks like the villain of the week in a Walker Texas Ranger episode.
|
# ¿ Oct 3, 2016 21:24 |
|
|
# ¿ May 12, 2024 03:24 |
|
I was kind of surprised the Onion didn't do an article about Brady getting fat and out of shape from watching football for a month. There was a legit article where he exclaimed how amazing the Redzone channel is - he had never seen it before.
|
# ¿ Oct 3, 2016 21:32 |