|
Cardinals look bad and Palmer is dead and or washed up Panthers look bad and Cam Newton is dead Vikings are good! 49ers are bad Seahawks are good! Saints are bad. Jets are goo---intercepted Bengals are mediocre as gently caress Browns are cursed Redskins are mediocre as gently caress Steelers are good! Broncos are good! Chargers are goo - actually last second change, Chargers bad Cowboys are mediocre as gently caress Giants are bad Falcons are...good? Rams are...good? Titans are bad, but they fired the ST coordinator, so clearly they are about to turn it around Ravens are mediocre as gently caress no matter what Ravens posters say Dolphins are bad Colts are bad Chiefs are mediocre as gently caress Raiders are good, but not as good as everyone wants them to be Bills are...mediocre as gently caress I guess Texans are mediocre as gently caress and JJ Watt is dead Jaguars are bad Eagles are good! Packers are good! Probably. Bears are still bad Lions are still bad Bucs are still bad The Patriots have Tom Brady back, loving hell This week, more football, including a cripple fight between Blaine Gabbert and Drew Stanton in COLORS  Edit: Intruder could you add a thread tag I'm an idiot Edit 2: 
Febreeze fucked around with this message at 05:32 on Oct 4, 2016 |
#
?
Oct 4, 2016 04:46
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 7, 2024 15:03 |
|
|
the thread tag is fine. the cards aren't color rushing because the 49ers are also wearing black, i think
|
|
#
?
Oct 4, 2016 04:48
|
|
|
Vikings are good!
|
|
#
?
Oct 4, 2016 04:48
|
|
|
there is, literally, not a single good game this week
|
|
#
?
Oct 4, 2016 04:49
|
|
|
not a single one
|
|
#
?
Oct 4, 2016 04:49
|
|
|
OSheaman posted:there is, literally, not a single good game this week Falcons/Broncos has potential Uh maybe Bengals/Cowboys too
|
|
#
?
Oct 4, 2016 04:50
|
|
|
The rams are not good, they are an illusion built on jeff fisher's ability to only coach well against the NFC West and lovely bad teams. Falcons might have a historically great offense to pair with a truly terrible defense, so basically greatest show on turf part duex 
|
|
#
?
Oct 4, 2016 04:50
|
|
|
OSheaman posted:there is, literally, not a single good game this week I think you'll find Tom Brady is playing
|
|
#
?
Oct 4, 2016 04:50
|
|
|
GABBERT STANTON THURSDAY NIGHT FOOTBALL YOU'LL STILL WATCH ANYWAY BECAUSE YOU'RE AN ADDICT
|
|
#
?
Oct 4, 2016 04:50
|
|
|
I remembered to leave ESPN on and watch Bad Beats this week. I encourage everyone to make this a Monday Night tradition.
|
|
#
?
Oct 4, 2016 04:51
|
|
|
OSheaman posted:there is, literally, not a single good game this week Falcons @ Broncos. Great offense, great defense. Love that game.
|
|
#
?
Oct 4, 2016 04:51
|
|
|
the op relies too heavily on wins and losses without taking quality of opponent and scores into account, and in my opinion it's due to odell beckham being slightly worse than michael crabtree in real life.
|
|
#
?
Oct 4, 2016 04:51
|
|
|
Brockenstein posted:Falcons/Broncos has potential The Falcons are going to get dismantled and neither the Bengals nor the Cowboys are good everyone, this is your week off from football
|
|
#
?
Oct 4, 2016 04:51
|
|
|
Febreeze posted:Titans loving suck
|
|
#
?
Oct 4, 2016 04:51
|
|
|
Teams are double teaming Nuk like every play and a lot of times also bracketing Fuller which should give some passes over the middle but Brock is terrible at intermediate passes so welp Hoyer is literally a better fit for this team than Brock (although having him at QB would negate the Fuller deep threat)
|
|
#
?
Oct 4, 2016 04:54
|
|
|
Cavauro posted:the op relies too heavily on wins and losses without taking quality of opponent and scores into account, and in my opinion it's due to odell beckham being slightly worse than michael crabtree in real life. Actually you'll find my formula is extremely detailed and my analysis expert level here is my formula I call it POOPNPEEVOA it works by taking the team you like and reminding you they are poo poo poo poo unless they are not in which case it doesn't.
|
|
#
?
Oct 4, 2016 04:56
|
|
|
Oh also it turns out Will Fuller was the best WR in this draft, who knew?Febreeze posted:Actually you'll find my formula is extremely detailed and my analysis expert level here is my formula I call it POOPNPEEVOA it works by taking the team you like and reminding you they are poo poo poo poo unless they are not in which case it doesn't. I don't respect any power rankings that don't put the Jags at #1
|
|
#
?
Oct 4, 2016 04:56
|
|
|
Intruder you made a good thread tag choiceBrockenstein posted:I don't respect any power rankings that don't put the Jags at #1 Well then check out my supplement ratings called "London Winners Power Rankings" they are #1
|
|
#
?
Oct 4, 2016 04:57
|
|
|
 at the bottom you can kind of see the inside of the boobies where it meets the non boobie part of the body
|
|
#
?
Oct 4, 2016 04:58
|
|
|
gently caress the Ravens QTIYD
|
|
#
?
Oct 4, 2016 05:01
|
|
|
wheres that graph thats titled : The Eagles Are Really Good
|
|
#
?
Oct 4, 2016 05:02
|
|
|
Febreeze posted:Well then check out my supplement ratings called "London Winners Power Rankings" they are #1 When I saw it as something I could pick I knew what I had to do
|
|
#
?
Oct 4, 2016 05:02
|
|
|
Tom Brady's got one more thing to deflate: the hopes and dreams of the people of Cleveland moreso
|
|
#
?
Oct 4, 2016 05:04
|
|
|
Eagles/Lions feels like a trap game
|
|
#
?
Oct 4, 2016 05:04
|
|
|
I'm going to the Bengals/Cowboys game. Not knowing a drat thing about the Bengals this season (aside from the NFL constant of "AJ Green is loving good"), I expect the Cowboys to put themselves in a position to barely beat Cincinnati before showing off their impression of the San Diego Chargers.
|
|
#
?
Oct 4, 2016 05:06
|
|
|
Giants are so loving TRASH.
|
|
#
?
Oct 4, 2016 05:08
|
|
|
Febreeze posted:Titans are bad, but they fired the ST coordinator, so clearly they are about to turn it around I'm glad you understand
|
|
#
?
Oct 4, 2016 05:08
|
|
|
Madcosby posted:wheres that graph thats titled : The Eagles Are Really Good 
|
|
#
?
Oct 4, 2016 05:09
|
|
|
that's a scatterplot not a graph
|
|
#
?
Oct 4, 2016 05:10
|
|
|
It is week 5 in the NFL and only the Browns and the J*g**rs haven't won a game in the Western hemisphere.OSheaman posted:there is, literally, not a single good game this week Giants and Packers will be entertaining, but probably not good or relevant to playoff standings.
|
|
#
?
Oct 4, 2016 05:10
|
|
|
OSheaman posted:that's a scatterplot not a graph
|
|
#
?
Oct 4, 2016 05:12
|
|
|
The Philadelphia Urethras
|
|
#
?
Oct 4, 2016 05:13
|
|
|
I'm glad the Packers are off bye week so I can actually watch football again This weekend was dreadful
|
|
#
?
Oct 4, 2016 05:16
|
|
|
aw, its a wing
|
|
#
?
Oct 4, 2016 05:16
|
|
|
|
|
#
?
Oct 4, 2016 05:17
|
|
|
OSheaman posted:there is, literally, not a single good game this week Eagles-Lions will be extremely entertaining offensive shootout. Book it Bengals-Boys will be entertaining. Who can gently caress up more? Bills-Rams I think is interesting, because whoever loses this game is liable to go on a long losing streak.
|
|
#
?
Oct 4, 2016 05:18
|
|
|
davecrazy posted:Giants are so loving TRASH. I had to check the thread this was in because we were about to have words
|
|
#
?
Oct 4, 2016 05:21
|
|
|
Brannock posted:Eagles-Lions will be extremely entertaining offensive shootout. Book it Lions gonna get hosed. One step closer to Caldwell getting fired, so i guess it isn't all bad
|
|
#
?
Oct 4, 2016 05:22
|
|
|
I mean I never really wanted to know what your genitals look like but now I REALLY don't want to know
|
|
#
?
Oct 4, 2016 05:24
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 7, 2024 15:03 |
|
|
Brockenstein posted:I mean I never really wanted to know what your genitals look like but now I REALLY don't want to know whose genitals would you be most interested to see
|
|
#
?
Oct 4, 2016 05:28
|
|