reallivedinosaur posted:

way easier and much more common to just put people on busses

Decebal posted:

Just an example I found on google. How can this be defended ? Nobody talks about it and no accountability is required. Move the borders until you win ! Sounds great !

reallivedinosaur posted:

easier to bus people in and not require ID to vote if you just want to commit fraud

Moridin920 posted:

you're just being willfully dense now lol

reallivedinosaur posted:

you put people on buses and drive them to the district you need their votes in, rather than go to the hassle of redrawing the electoral map and hoping everyone goes along with you

The Landstander posted:

Obama was good at glossing over the splits in the Democratic Party between (for lack of better terms) leftists and liberals.

quote:

Are there restrictions on who the Electors can vote for?

There is no Constitutional provision or Federal law that requires Electors to vote according to the results of the popular vote in their states. Some states, however, require Electors to cast their votes according to the popular vote. These pledges fall into two categories—Electors bound by state law and those bound by pledges to political parties.

The U.S. Supreme Court has held that the Constitution does not require that Electors be completely free to act as they choose and therefore, political parties may extract pledges from electors to vote for the parties' nominees. Some state laws provide that so-called "faithless Electors" may be subject to fines or may be disqualified for casting an invalid vote and be replaced by a substitute elector. The Supreme Court has not specifically ruled on the question of whether pledges and penalties for failure to vote as pledged may be enforced under the Constitution. No Elector has ever been prosecuted for failing to vote as pledged.

Today, it is rare for Electors to disregard the popular vote by casting their electoral vote for someone other than their party's candidate. Electors generally hold a leadership position in their party or were chosen to recognize years of loyal service to the party. Throughout our history as a nation, more than 99 percent of Electors have voted as pledged.

That Robot posted:

op this is a bad idea

and I'm saying this as a socialist who voted for bernie in the primaries and then hillary for early voting

what you're proposing will help trump, who is dumb and bad and also a fuckin retardo

That Robot posted:

op this is a bad idea

and I'm saying this as a socialist who voted for bernie in the primaries and then hillary for early voting

what you're proposing will help trump, who is dumb and bad and also a fuckin retardo

ArbitraryC posted:

This is a terrible way of viewing things and largely why we have two candidates no one likes in the first place.

interwhat posted:

We literally have no options here. The terrifying part is, it really isn't clear that Hillary will make a better president

That Robot posted:

op this is a bad idea

and I'm saying this as a socialist who voted for bernie in the primaries and then hillary for early voting

what you're proposing will help trump, who is dumb and bad and also a fuckin retardo

Sethex posted:

https://mobile.twitter.com/Channel4News/status/794232437337247744

Your view isn't shared by people smarter than you.

my bat mitzvah ROCKED posted:

I refuse to watch any video of that fat slob sylvester the cat sounding guy

Kuato posted:

I don't get why people were so into Bernie. He was OK, but it seems obvious the dearth of people running for the nomination inflated his appeal to most. I compare him to Mike Gravel all the time because I'm assuming if the 08 field were as weak as 16 Gravel would've been more competitive.

My FB wall reads like baby's first election with the kind of people who support him.

Sethex posted:

https://mobile.twitter.com/Channel4News/status/794232437337247744

Your view isn't shared by people smarter than you.

poorlifedecision posted:

You seem like a smart chap, advise me on who to vote for pls.

Moridin920 posted:

you're just being willfully dense now lol

Ork of Fiction posted:

It is his personality to be willfully dense. It's part of his charm.

Sethex posted:

https://mobile.twitter.com/Channel4News/status/794232437337247744

Your view isn't shared by people smarter than you.

interwhat posted:

Here's my biggest problems with the candidates: Hillary has flip flopped on nearly all the issues in favor of who tosses the most cash her way, so what's to keep her from buying into another loving war. Trump has the vocabulary of a fifth grader, and has yet to complete one single sentence, something I think should be a minimum requirement for gaining keys to the nukes.

If this is all America could loving come up with, then I mean god drat

Pity Party Animal posted:

How is Bernie formed?
How is Bernie formed? How president get elacted?

They need to do way inprison Hillary> who steal from our Bernies. becuse my Bernie cant fright back?
It was on the reddit this mrach a Hillary in nv who had steal her election. they are taking the nasty woman back to new york too lady to prison my pary are with Bernie who lost his nomination; i am truely sorry for your lots.

reallivedinosaur posted:

the left is fine with redistricting when it comes to "muh integrated schools" or whatever

easier to bus people in and not require ID to vote if you just want to commit fraud

Sethex posted:

Your view isn't shared by people smarter than you.

Decebal posted:

Just an example I found on google. How can this be defended ? Nobody talks about it and no accountability is required. Move the borders until you win ! Sounds great !

logikv9 posted: