|
It seems like we don't know
|
# ? Nov 6, 2016 21:18 |
|
|
# ? May 21, 2024 06:05 |
|
the ruling class of vampires and the undead circulation of Capital
|
# ? Nov 6, 2016 21:18 |
|
OP DID YOU KNOW THAT IF EVERYONE WROTE IN BERNIE SANDERS HE WOULD BECOME TO PRESIDENT?? HE COULD STILL DO IT
|
# ? Nov 6, 2016 21:20 |
|
Bruce Campbell.
|
# ? Nov 6, 2016 21:23 |
|
one candidate has had a steady solid lead in the polls and the EV since the spring but the media insists its a horserace (please click, watch, like and subscribe!) so it could be anyone really
|
# ? Nov 6, 2016 21:23 |
|
Rhix posted:one candidate has had a steady solid lead in the polls and the EV since the spring but the media insists its a horserace (please click, watch, like and subscribe!) so it could be anyone really Hm this seems fake
|
# ? Nov 6, 2016 21:24 |
|
the people of the united states of america will be the real winners, op
|
# ? Nov 6, 2016 21:25 |
|
I'm nervous about a Clinton victory because I live in the south and plenty of people know I'm not a Trump supporter. The rebels will kill me.
|
# ? Nov 6, 2016 21:26 |
|
This is generally the most pro-Trump prediction from sites considered reliable.
|
# ? Nov 6, 2016 21:27 |
|
Gobblecoque posted:Bruce Campbell.
|
# ? Nov 6, 2016 21:28 |
|
I hope it's Hillary for the sake of my mum. She's not American but she'd be sad if that horrible man won. She's becoming very nihilistic this year, and that's no fun, only I'm allowed to be moody.
|
# ? Nov 6, 2016 22:13 |
|
My vote for Gilbert Gottfried WILL be counted!
|
# ? Nov 6, 2016 22:16 |
|
canpakes posted:It seems like we don't know It's more like YOU don't know. WE are 100% certain who is going to win.
|
# ? Nov 6, 2016 22:19 |
|
also i'm hillary ama
|
# ? Nov 6, 2016 22:20 |
|
I'm voting for Greg Johnson. You should too, op.
|
# ? Nov 6, 2016 22:21 |
|
Sheep-Goats posted:
I do wonder what Nate Silver is up to. I can see what his point is, that historically speaking, a 3 point lead in the polls doesn't mean much, but the thing about the race is, Hillary Clinton has led by much more, while the best Donald Trump has managed to do is pull almost even. Given the historical voting patterns of the states involved, and Trump's historically high unfavorable numbers, its odd that Silver continues to call this like any other race. I guess his logic is to only pay attention to the numbers: if we had a charismatic and conventional Republican politician who had been, like, the governor of a state, would we say that this polling gap was still a close race? Maybe. But it seems ridiculous to ignore that Clinton has demonstrated more upside than Trump.
|
# ? Nov 6, 2016 22:23 |
|
I hope it's Joe Exotic
|
# ? Nov 6, 2016 22:26 |
|
We should take a nation wide poll to see who will win
|
# ? Nov 6, 2016 22:26 |
|
The Walton Family will win.
|
# ? Nov 6, 2016 22:27 |
|
Seriously all I can say is that either way this election goes, we Americans are going to lose....
|
# ? Nov 6, 2016 22:28 |
|
Arrhythmia posted:OP DID YOU KNOW THAT IF EVERYONE WROTE IN BERNIE SANDERS HE WOULD BECOME TO PRESIDENT?? DONALD TRUMP there i did it
|
# ? Nov 6, 2016 22:29 |
|
Trump is going to win and it's going to be the funniest thing to ever happen to this country. Alternatively, Hillary is going to win and she's going to have a massive stroke within her first six months in office and Trump is going to be all like
|
# ? Nov 6, 2016 22:30 |
|
Schwarzenegger 2020
|
# ? Nov 6, 2016 22:30 |
|
glowing-fish posted:I do wonder what Nate Silver is up to. I can see what his point is, that historically speaking, a 3 point lead in the polls doesn't mean much, but the thing about the race is, Hillary Clinton has led by much more, while the best Donald Trump has managed to do is pull almost even. Given the historical voting patterns of the states involved, and Trump's historically high unfavorable numbers, its odd that Silver continues to call this like any other race.
|
# ? Nov 6, 2016 22:30 |
|
grymwulf posted:Seriously all I can say is that either way this election goes, we Americans are going to lose.... Actually it seems like hillary is super qualified and will do a good job???
|
# ? Nov 6, 2016 22:33 |
|
tsa posted:Actually it seems like hillary is super qualified and will do a good job??? needs a lot more question marks
|
# ? Nov 6, 2016 22:34 |
|
I remember when Bill Richardson ran and one of his ads was him saying he's overqualified. Suffice to say he gained zero traction and his candidacy went over about as well as a wet fart.
|
# ? Nov 6, 2016 22:37 |
|
.
|
# ? Nov 6, 2016 22:39 |
|
RIP dumb dogs lol
|
# ? Nov 6, 2016 22:42 |
|
Kuato posted:I remember when Bill Richardson ran and one of his ads was him saying he's overqualified. Suffice to say he gained zero traction and his candidacy went over about as well as a wet fart. How can you get to that level and not know that the word "overqualified" is never a good way to describe yourself?
|
# ? Nov 6, 2016 22:42 |
|
Hillary is going to win but the republicans and trump will file lawsuit after lawsuit to stall the process. During this time they will refuse to appoint a supreme court judge claiming they need to make sure her presidency is legit. Once she wins the law suits the republicans will file for impeachment. During this time they will refuse to appoint a supreme court judge citing the impeachment. Once Hillary wins that it's 2020 and kayne will run and save us from this mess
|
# ? Nov 6, 2016 22:51 |
|
glowing-fish posted:I do wonder what Nate Silver is up to. I can see what his point is, that historically speaking, a 3 point lead in the polls doesn't mean much, but the thing about the race is, Hillary Clinton has led by much more, while the best Donald Trump has managed to do is pull almost even. Given the historical voting patterns of the states involved, and Trump's historically high unfavorable numbers, its odd that Silver continues to call this like any other race. His background was in sports statistics and especially in that field it's seen as important to kind of make your prediction model "dumb" in that it just looks at numbers and goes by that. It's hard to explain what I mean exactly but sports guys had for a long time relied on this kind of human generated decision processes and humans always find too much "pattern" when they look at something, which meant when Moneyball type stuff started being done broadly and in earnest the biggest advancements were made in areas that this caused errors in, eg, where being smart lead to being wrong. Silver in general makes a huge effort to audit his own methods and intake so that would lead to him being stubborn about "dumbness" I think. It's a complicated field and there are reasons to approach things from both ways.
|
# ? Nov 6, 2016 22:55 |
|
Kanye 2020
|
# ? Nov 6, 2016 22:57 |
|
Certainly not the American people.
|
# ? Nov 6, 2016 22:59 |
|
People who rub their hands together waiting on any word from the Prophet Nate Silver are idiots. It's statistics he's not like Harry Potter, it'd be better to just cram your rear end with Captain Crunch put on a eye patch then raid a English Galleon than fret about what the gently caress Nate Silver says. Statistics is not a complicated science and if you can pass basic high school level math you can understand what the hell he's talking about and the methods he uses. Guesss what he just makes up poo poo.
|
# ? Nov 6, 2016 23:05 |
|
Vastarien posted:Alternatively, Hillary is going to win and she's going to have a massive stroke within her first six months in office and Trump is going to be all like Best case scenario.
|
# ? Nov 6, 2016 23:06 |
|
If you asked me a week or so ago I would've said Hillary but man oh man I just don't know anymore(!)
|
# ? Nov 6, 2016 23:10 |
|
In the grim future of 11/09/16 there are only walls.
|
# ? Nov 6, 2016 23:14 |
|
I am hedging my bets on "Cucky Pizzone".
|
# ? Nov 6, 2016 23:14 |
|
|
# ? May 21, 2024 06:05 |
hillary will win, ushering in 4 more years of corporate kleptocracy
|
|
# ? Nov 6, 2016 23:14 |