|
.
|
#
¿
Nov 10, 2016 16:13
|
|
|
|
| # ¿ May 16, 2024 06:05 |
|
|
"The true believers of Trump dont actually control the machinery" Yeah just two of 3 branches of government and a soon to be SCOTUS majority  Anyone who doesnt take anything Trump says deadly seriously at this point is a loving idiot. Trump can do anything he wants to do with a united government and you dumb fucks saying he is going to get stabbed in the back are going to keep saying that poo poo as he starts deportations and clamping down press freedoms, nodding to yourselves, as you hear the Goldshirts knocking at your doors. ex post facho fucked around with this message at 09:36 on Nov 14, 2016 |
|
#
¿
Nov 14, 2016 09:33
|
|
|
QuarkJets posted:yeah seriously we're talking about maybe the loss of gay marriage, and that's only if another justice dies. poo poo's going to be hosed on the economic front but no one is getting purged by browncoats lol @ this post
|
|
#
¿
Nov 14, 2016 09:42
|
|
|
Bip Roberts posted:There's a difference between people who think Trump is useful and a true believer. Who gives a gently caress about those people or what they think? Not Donald Trump - Donald Trump Donald Trump is the loving Commander in Chief, and every Republican not named Lindsay Graham is ready to gargle Trump's balls on every policy whim that pops into his head. I can't wait to see how quickly the first Republican who opposes him publicly post-inauguration gets destroyed. I really cannot believe the complacency of anyone about Trump, not least anyone who supported Hillary.
|
|
#
¿
Nov 14, 2016 09:48
|
|
|
sd6 posted:Bannon is an rear end in a top hat for sure but you might want to calm down a bit man. This sounds like Obama marching white people into FEMA camps level of crazy paranoia If you calm down over Bannon's appointment or anything about a Trump presidency, you are objectively a loving idiot. Nobody is being a pollyanna for rightly pointing out that the appointment of white nationalist racists to the highest offices in the country is frightening and raises serious questions about the future of America.
|
|
#
¿
Nov 18, 2016 22:47
|
|
|
Boon posted:Oh my god I can almost feel the smug oozing out of this post i think bernie supporters have earned a right to be smug at this point all things considered lol
|
|
#
¿
Nov 29, 2016 22:14
|
|
|
zegermans posted:Why, they lost to a loser, making them double losers. Nah, "they" had the better candidate lose to internal party collusion which, later exposed, also helped to seal the Democrats defeat in the general, so yes, some smug is warranted. The irony of the DNC colluding in Hillary's nomination only for her to lose to the least qualified candidate in American history is pretty loving rich, imo
|
|
#
¿
Nov 29, 2016 22:39
|
|
|
^^ Yes, Donna Brazile leaked her debate questions, which is loving ludicrous for a candidate as prepared as HillaryBip Roberts posted:No one colluded against Bernie you dope. i mean do you want me to quote WaPo, the NYT, Rolling Stone, the Guardian, or
|
|
#
¿
Nov 29, 2016 22:45
|
|
|
Oh, sorry, I forgot the definition of collusion is an email literally stating "we're literally colluding against Bernie Sanders to give the nomination to Hillary", instead of the extensive evidence of the party's officials working to undermine his campaign and highlight his faith as a negative point lmao
|
|
#
¿
Nov 29, 2016 22:49
|
|
|
Anyway it's water under a bridge in New Jersey at this point. How about that latest Trump tweet and the upcoming devastation of our healthcare system and regulatory environment? Lookin' good! I read something yesterday that we're now basically locked into 10+ feet of sea level rise, possibly more, depending on how quickly the Antarctic/Greenland ice sheets melt. It's gonna be a terrifying next 50 years.
|
|
#
¿
Nov 29, 2016 22:53
|
|
|
HannibalBarca posted:https://twitter.com/OsitaNwanevu/status/803688010327867392 Everything about the Clinton campaign is terrible, 2008-2016. Trump is going to loving suck, but now more than ever it underscores how badly Democrats need to get away from party holdovers of the 90s and early 2000s.
|
|
#
¿
Nov 29, 2016 23:26
|
|
|
Angry_Ed posted:Yeah like i'm going to look at a campaign of a man that couldn't beat Hilary Clinton in the primary and immediately bent the knee to Donald Trump after the election ended. The fact that he would have beaten Donald Trump in the general election? Or, more realistically: not saddled with the Mount Everest-sized hubris of the Clinton campaign still working off lovely focus group lines and dealing with the litany of scandals (both real and fabricated by Republicans), Bernie would have at least won loving Michigan and Wisconsin, if not PA, OH and FL. ex post facho fucked around with this message at 22:55 on Nov 30, 2016 |
|
#
¿
Nov 30, 2016 22:53
|
|
|
Angry_Ed posted:Nice of you to grace us with a visit from the Mirror Universe. Tell me, does Donald Trump have a goatee? You asked for a roadmap, Bernie's campaign epitomized how the Democrats need to run future campaigns to win. They need to focus more on tackling economic disparity (which will be even worse in 2018 and 2020), true healthcare reform (single payer), reducing the cost of higher education, hammering Republicans on voter suppression, expanding earned benefit programs and promotion of long-term national investment in the sciences and infrastructure. shrike82 posted:I'm late to the party but the fact that we have to relitigate the fact that Obama is a lovely rear end neoliberal president with people like Angry Ed every 20 pages is a sign that the DNC wing hasn't learnt anything. Also this.
|
|
#
¿
Nov 30, 2016 23:02
|
|
|
If this thread is anything to go by, that will only be true because Democrats refuse to embrace and offer a true alternative to Republicans.
|
|
#
¿
Nov 30, 2016 23:12
|
|
|
Tell me, what is the "moderate part" of the Democratic party? If you're referring to dumping the parts that continue to roll over on things like a living wage, single payer, sane immigration policy, and climate change policy then yeah, sorry, moderates raus
|
|
#
¿
Nov 30, 2016 23:17
|
|
|
Khisanth Magus posted:People like you want to completely alienate 1/4-1/3 of the democrat voters who are moderates and don't want FULL COMMUNISM NOW, but who also don't agree with the GOP. The Democrats aren't winning elections now  Obama was a backlash against the incompetence of W., Democrats have been losing where it counts (local and state elections) for the last 25 years.
|
|
#
¿
Nov 30, 2016 23:19
|
|
|
shrike82 posted:I'd like to ask these so-called "moderates" to explain the Grand Bargain something something have to raise the debt ceiling something something compromise something reaching across the aisle
|
|
#
¿
Nov 30, 2016 23:26
|
|
|
Doccers posted:Just to test the waters here, what are the thoughts on John Hickenlooper running for 2020? Jesus christ no. Hick was a decent mayor and has been an ok governor but he's definitely not someone I want on a national level
|
|
#
¿
Nov 30, 2016 23:42
|
|
|
Shimrra Jamaane posted:I wonder if Hillary will reach a 3 million vote lead in the popular vote. Jesus Christ that's nuts. Why, that's more than 5 Wyomings!
|
|
#
¿
Nov 30, 2016 23:54
|
|
|
I complained about her but still voted for her. Trump won because Hillary was a garbage candidate under FBI investigation who ran a lovely campaign full of hubris and complacency.
|
|
#
¿
Nov 30, 2016 23:57
|
|
|
“For every blue-collar Democrat we lose in western Pennsylvania, we will pick up two moderate Republicans in the suburbs in Philadelphia, and you can repeat that in Ohio and Illinois and Wisconsin.” larf
|
|
#
¿
Nov 30, 2016 23:59
|
|
|
Spacebump posted:That was kneecapped at the very end by the FBI releasing a letter. Both campaign data teams have cited the last Comey letter as when their numbers started changing in favor of Trump. Oh, James Comey's letter absolutely hosed her and probably accounted for as much as a 0.5%-1.0% difference in voter participation/totals in a lot of states. My point is that against someone like Donald Trump it shouldn't even have been that loving close. But it was, even though Clinton and co. just blithely assumed their invulnerability in WI/MI/PA. WHOOPS
|
|
#
¿
Dec 1, 2016 00:02
|
|
|
|
| # ¿ May 16, 2024 06:05 |
|
|
SaTaMaS posted:It's getting really hard to tell who is being super ironic and who is just completely insane Uh, what's wrong with that post, other than hoping Obama will be poo poo on harder than Carter (he will be)?
|
|
#
¿
Dec 1, 2016 05:02
|
|