Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
 
  • Locked thread
punk rebel ecks
Dec 11, 2010

A shitty post? This calls for a dance of deduction.
I'm going to quote myself again because it's just so loving ridiuclous.

punk rebel ecks posted:

How did the Democrats gently caress up THIS BAD!?

Not just this year, but pretty much how it snowballed into this.

Why didn't the alarms ring after 2010?

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

A GIANT PARSNIP
Apr 13, 2010

Too much fuckin' eggnog


punk rebel ecks posted:

I'm going to quote myself again because it's just so loving ridiuclous.

They did, the real problem is that a huge chunk of the electorate is in massive decline and neither party has a solution for them, so they swing against whoever appears to be in power. That's been the Democrats in 2010, 2014, and 2016, but it was the GOP in 2006 and 2008.

The only reason 2012 wasn't a GOP wave was the raw political talent of Obama.

This isn't to say a 2018 Dem wave is assured, but it's a real goal to work towards.

Typo
Aug 19, 2009

Chernigov Military Aviation Lyceum
The Fighting Slowpokes
The democrats are losing more elections aren't they

Sheng-Ji Yang
Mar 5, 2014



remember when donald trump proposed a massive one time wealth tax on all individual net worth to pay off the entire national debt at once? good times

The Ol Spicy Keychain
Jan 17, 2013

I MEPHISTO MY OWN ASSHOLE

Obama and Hillary need to get the gently caress out forever.

Well What Now
Nov 10, 2016

by Fluffdaddy
Shredded Hen

Typo posted:

The democrats are losing more elections aren't they



literally never heard of that site before and a quick google of that author's name turns up a dozen people's LinkedIns

Larry Parrish
Jul 9, 2012

by Jeffrey of YOSPOS
We must purge the centrists, but especially the third way or conservative except we sit on the left kind of centrist

Automata 10 Pack
Jun 21, 2007

Ten games published by Automata, on one cassette

Mutant Standard posted:

is there some some web 3.0 bullshit website for finding... I dunno... political campaigns to participate in? advocacy groups to help out? hope? any way to channel this anxiety and anger into something productive?

i guess not then huh

Probably Magic
Oct 9, 2012

Looking cute, feeling cute.

LinYutang posted:

bernie openly firing broadsides at the Dem establishment :berned:



I like to think this was specifically aimed at Barney Frank and poo poo like this - http://www.politico.com/magazine/story/2015/12/bank-reform-barney-frank-wall-street-213412.

anime was right
Jun 27, 2008

death is certain
keep yr cool

Sheng-ji Yang posted:

remember when donald trump proposed a massive one time wealth tax on all individual net worth to pay off the entire national debt at once? good times

gently caress it, why not

the bitcoin of weed
Nov 1, 2014

Mutant Standard posted:

i guess not then huh

call ur state DNC person and yell at them https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1S7w8tvS0NWA3AX8JdFjZLLAW7f_S4hp2T3416ttjBtg/edit

otherwise there's an activism thread for like nonprofits and such if you wanna get into that

Atrocious Joe
Sep 2, 2011

Mutant Standard posted:

is there some some web 3.0 bullshit website for finding... I dunno... political campaigns to participate in? advocacy groups to help out? hope? any way to channel this anxiety and anger into something productive?

You can help us struggle for socialism against this barbarism comrade*

*in 3 to 4 weeks as everyone takes a while to process the surge in new applicants
https://forums.somethingawful.com/showthread.php?threadid=3760900

Lastgirl
Sep 7, 1997


Good Morning!
Sunday Morning!

Mutant Standard posted:

from a new york times article i googled:

alright, does anybody remember this or am I going to have to find it myself?
edit:

i dunno guys dean sounds kinda cool

jesus christ

gently caress the establishment and their myopia, this is just one of the biggest and longest elaborate ritual of seppuku ive ever seen from them

reignonyourparade
Nov 15, 2012
poo poo a balanced budget amendment would be good for Republicans long term cause it'd make it harder for democrats to fund Fixing Things if/when they take back over.

Gringostar
Nov 12, 2016
Morbid Hound

Larry Parrish posted:

We must purge the centrists, but especially the third way or conservative except we sit on the left kind of centrist

im in favor of giving centrists and third wayers a choice between joining the new democrats, or the guillotine

Atrocious Joe
Sep 2, 2011

The GOP is going to pass as many constitutional amendments as possible to cement power.

They're not going to avoid doing that for some good of the nation bullshit. How many times over the past 8 years did we have debt ceiling and shutdown fights? Previously rare political crises became the norm because of GOP political strategy.

Raskolnikov38
Mar 3, 2007

We were somewhere around Manila when the drugs began to take hold

Atrocious Joe posted:

You can help us struggle for socialism against this barbarism comrade*

*in 3 to 4 weeks as everyone takes a while to process the surge in new applicants
https://forums.somethingawful.com/showthread.php?threadid=3760900

this is the democrats rebuilding thread not the convert people to hopeless causes thread
















or is it??????? :spooky:

Larry Parrish
Jul 9, 2012

by Jeffrey of YOSPOS
The new deal would never have happened without the imminent threat of the Progressive movement threatening to explode into rebellion


I don't think things are that bad but it's worth mentioning I guess

Majorian
Jul 1, 2009

Inverted Offensive Battle: Acupuncture Attacks Convert To 3D Penetration Tactics Taking Advantage of Deep Battle Opportunities

A GIANT PARSNIP posted:

They did, the real problem is that a huge chunk of the electorate is in massive decline and neither party has a solution for them, so they swing against whoever appears to be in power. That's been the Democrats in 2010, 2014, and 2016, but it was the GOP in 2006 and 2008.

The only reason 2012 wasn't a GOP wave was the raw political talent of Obama.

This isn't to say a 2018 Dem wave is assured, but it's a real goal to work towards.

Adding to that, it helped that a lot of the Democratic figures who did the worst in '10 and '14 were just terrible candidates on their own merits.

Atrocious Joe
Sep 2, 2011

The Dems only control a couple more state governments than any US socialist party. The gap in number of elected officials between Dems and socialists is increasingly narrow.

Atrocious Joe
Sep 2, 2011

Larry Parrish posted:

The new deal would never have happened without the imminent threat of the Progressive movement threatening to explode into rebellion


I don't think things are that bad but it's worth mentioning I guess

Fishmech level post here but in the early 20th century progressives were pretty distinct from socialists, communists, and labor radicals. I think a lot of progressive did became part of New Deal coalitions, but in the preceding decades they favored "good governance" over popular participation in government or equal rights for many groups.

You are right though that the New Deal was only possible because capital was legitimately concerned about revolution.

Sheng-Ji Yang
Mar 5, 2014


and the second new deal only happened because FDR was terrified of Huey Long running third party and splitting his vote

exmarx
Feb 18, 2012


The experience over the years
of nothing getting better
only worse.

logikv9 posted:

only after they repeal the 17th

the thirteenth

Hamelekim
Feb 25, 2006

And another thing... if global warming is real. How come it's so damn cold?
Ramrod XTreme

Atrocious Joe posted:

The Dems only control a couple more state governments than any US socialist party. The gap in number of elected officials between Dems and socialists is increasingly narrow.

The wealth gap is near or surpassing what it was leading up to the New Deal. Things are going to get far worse and education costs increase and competition increases for those spots in university. The future is a big mess under the current capitalist system. We are going to need a new New Deal in the relatively near future out of necessity. Automation of vehicles along with production of goods and services is going to wipe out so many jobs, and there won't be enough jobs, or educated people to take new jobs.

We are seriously in a bad spot, and anyone who says otherwise isn't looking at the technological and economic trends. I don't know what the future holds, but I do know that we are headed towards a brick wall at 100mph and I don't want to find out what the result of that is.

punk rebel ecks
Dec 11, 2010

A shitty post? This calls for a dance of deduction.

big juicy nectarine posted:

I like to think this was specifically aimed at Barney Frank and poo poo like this - http://www.politico.com/magazine/story/2015/12/bank-reform-barney-frank-wall-street-213412.

There used to be a time when I really respected Barney Frank. But due to his idiotic "incrementalism" strategies, being dismissive and condescending as gently caress to left wing activists, and his strong stance against against transparency.

anime was right
Jun 27, 2008

death is certain
keep yr cool
my fb is real bad right now. real real real bad. i hate fb so much.

so many fingers in the ears.

Top City Homo
Oct 15, 2014


Ramrod XTreme

Atrocious Joe posted:

You can help us struggle for socialism against this barbarism comrade*

*in 3 to 4 weeks as everyone takes a while to process the surge in new applicants
https://forums.somethingawful.com/showthread.php?threadid=3760900

with chuck schumer and nancy pelosi leading the senate and the house as minority leaders, two old moneyed assholes from tech and wallstreet

the democrats are sure to retake congress in 2018 :downs:

iospace
Jan 19, 2038


reignonyourparade posted:

poo poo a balanced budget amendment would be good for Republicans long term cause it'd make it harder for democrats to fund Fixing Things if/when they take back over.

It would, buuuuuuuuuut they'll never pass it. It's one of those carrots they dangle but they know it's a bad idea. Why?

1. Their own personal pet projects. Or, in a simpler term: the military. Or to expand: the military buys equipment from companies that just happen to also fund campaigns for that district's republican representative.
2. HEY GUYS, WE JUST GOT ATTACKED. DO WE A. CUT ALL FUNDING FOR EVERYTHING BUT THE MILITARY OR B. RAISE TAXES.

See also: term limits, lobbying reform

punk rebel ecks
Dec 11, 2010

A shitty post? This calls for a dance of deduction.
Is this real?

iospace
Jan 19, 2038


anime was right posted:

my fb is real bad right now. real real real bad. i hate fb so much.

so many fingers in the ears.

Ask them how they intend to fix it, then report back!

punk rebel ecks
Dec 11, 2010

A shitty post? This calls for a dance of deduction.
I keep hearing bad things about this guy from a fair bit amount of establishment Dems.

Was he very authoritarian?

Sheng-Ji Yang
Mar 5, 2014


punk rebel ecks posted:

I keep hearing bad things about this guy from a fair bit amount of establishment Dems.

Was he very authoritarian?

They say they don't like my methods. Well, I don't like them either. I really don't like to have to do things the way I do. I'd much rather get up before the legislature and say, 'Now this is a good law and it's for the benefit of the people, and I'd like you to vote for it in the interest of the public welfare.' Only I know that laws ain't made that way. You've got to fight fire with fire.

Larry Parrish
Jul 9, 2012

by Jeffrey of YOSPOS

punk rebel ecks posted:

I keep hearing bad things about this guy from a fair bit amount of establishment Dems.

Was he very authoritarian?

I've heard so many versions of who Huey Long was lol.Someone people say he was just a power hungry guy who wanted to ride populism to the White House, others say he was the public and legitimate face of a communist movement.



None of them were ever positive though

Segmentation Fault
Jun 7, 2012

Mutant Standard posted:

Oh, Dean was a lobbyist for Dentons.

They're the ones now picking the Trump's cabinet.

oh :smith:

Jesus Christ, Denton.

Top City Homo
Oct 15, 2014


Ramrod XTreme

Larry Parrish posted:

I've heard so many versions of who Huey Long was lol.Someone people say he was just a power hungry guy who wanted to ride populism to the White House, others say he was the public and legitimate face of a communist movement.



None of them were ever positive though

he was good

Sheng-Ji Yang
Mar 5, 2014


huey long was the greatest american leftwing populist ever, more so than even la follette, and if he hadnt been shot would have been president.

that said, despite being relatively tolerant for a southerner at the time on race issues, he was still pretty drat racist.

i strongly recommend T. Harry Williams' bio, it dispels all the bs about him being The Next Hitler and whatever but calls him out where he was poo poo

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UEUHEX4g4Cc

BrutalistMcDonalds
Oct 4, 2012


Lipstick Apathy
Yeah I wouldn't call Long a communist, as communists at the time considered him to be a fascist. (Look up CPUSA literature on him -- back when the CPUSA was an extension of the Comintern.)

But I don't think that was accurate, and he was maybe more of a Peronist? He attracted support from fascists like Charles Coughlin, but the extent of their relationship is unclear to me.

Edit: OK this is Wikipedia but: Peronism is widely regarded as a form of corporate socialism, or "right-wing socialism".[2] Perón's public speeches were consistently nationalist and populist. It would be difficult to separate Peronism from corporate nationalism, for Perón nationalized Argentina's large corporations, blurring distinctions between corporations and government. At the same time, the labor unions became corporate, ceding the right to strike in agreements with Perón as Secretary of Welfare in the military government from 1943–45. In exchange, the state was to assume the role of negotiator between conflicting interests.

That ... sounds like how Long governed Louisiana.

BrutalistMcDonalds has issued a correction as of 07:57 on Nov 14, 2016

The Vinja Ninja
Mar 16, 2006

Sometimes, time beats you.

Gringostar posted:

im in favor of giving centrists and third wayers a choice between joining the new democrats, or the guillotine

Wow, the Zero Tolerance Schools are really taking being intolerant to the next level. Its almost like we have warring factions of racially intolerant people vs the gluten intolerant masses. Both sides problem is being intolerant.

punk rebel ecks
Dec 11, 2010

A shitty post? This calls for a dance of deduction.
What made Huey Long "fascist"? Or "authoritarian"? What did he do that was so shocking?

punk rebel ecks has issued a correction as of 08:04 on Nov 14, 2016

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Sheng-Ji Yang
Mar 5, 2014


Wikkheiser posted:

Yeah I wouldn't call Long a communist, as communists at the time considered him to be a fascist. (Look up CPUSA literature on him -- back when the CPUSA was an extension of the Comintern.)

But I don't think that was accurate, and he was maybe more of a Peronist? He attracted support from fascists like Charles Coughlin, but the extent of their relationship is unclear to me.

coughlin didnt really become an antisemite fascist until after Long died. he basically hijacked the organization Long built and turned into a fascist thing

Wikkheiser posted:


Edit: OK this is Wikipedia but: Peronism is widely regarded as a form of corporate socialism, or "right-wing socialism".[2] Perón's public speeches were consistently nationalist and populist. It would be difficult to separate Peronism from corporate nationalism, for Perón nationalized Argentina's large corporations, blurring distinctions between corporations and government. At the same time, the labor unions became corporate, ceding the right to strike in agreements with Perón as Secretary of Welfare in the military government from 1943–45. In exchange, the state was to assume the role of negotiator between conflicting interests.

That ... sounds like how Long governed Louisiana.

Peronism benefited a certain sect of elite, whereas Long was an out and out populist whose base of support were poor white farmers in the north of LA. he was at war with the wealthy of the entire state the entire time he was governor and senator, which eventually got him killed.

honestly id compare him to a Hugo Chavez without the leftist trappings

  • Locked thread