|
I would further say that JJ Abrams has no soul.
|
#
¿
Dec 1, 2016 22:09
|
|
|
|
| # ¿ May 10, 2024 03:38 |
|
|
JJ Abrams is really Clifford the Dog in a almost convincing man suit.
|
|
#
¿
Dec 1, 2016 22:16
|
|
|
GonSmithe posted:The first JJTrek movie is probably the best Star Trek movie besides Wrath of Khan I won't lie, 2009 Trek was a good movie.. then Into Darkness came out.
|
|
#
¿
Dec 1, 2016 23:20
|
|
|
It doesn't, but Into Darkness will mire the entire JJ Trekverse for me even though 2009 and Beyond were good movies.
|
|
#
¿
Dec 1, 2016 23:35
|
|
|
The problem with TFA, besides JJ Abrams involvement, is it tried too hard to be A New Hope... Which given JJ Abrams involvement I guess was to be expected. He made a lovely low effort unfun rip off of Wrath of Khan so I guess Star Wars needed its turn. At least he didn't go for the Empire Strikes Back rehash.
|
|
#
¿
Dec 2, 2016 07:24
|
|
|
Just because he didn't write them doesn't mean he had no influence over them. What are the odds that he directs two films that are complete rehashes of prior successful films in two different franchises, only a few years apart?
|
|
#
¿
Dec 2, 2016 07:33
|
|
|
The only movie I enjoyed that Abrams had any involvement with was Armageddon. Everything else he has done movie wise has been a dud for me. I will admit I've not seen any of his television work but I also don't really watch T.V.
|
|
#
¿
Dec 2, 2016 09:21
|
|
|
Lurdiak posted:It's really weird how dedicated some of you are to saying the new Star Wars is bad even though everyone loves it. Sorry that I am capable of forming my own opinions and stuff.
|
|
#
¿
Dec 2, 2016 14:38
|
|
|
|
| # ¿ May 10, 2024 03:38 |
|
|
wizard on a water slide posted:Dude hell yeah he is. I was like "wuh" when I heard the announcement and then thought about Looper again and it made perfect sense. He's a very good choice to make a new Star Wars picture. Not to go off topic, but Looper loving owned hardcore.
|
|
#
¿
Dec 3, 2016 05:00
|
|