Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
 
  • Locked thread
Small Strange Bird
Sep 22, 2006

Merci, chaton!
Spectre keeps breaking the cardinal rule of action movies by having action sequences where nothing of interest or consequence happens. The entire car chase through a bizarrely empty Rome is a case in point: Bond is in exactly the same position at the end as at the beginning in story terms (he got away from the Spectre meeting), except that he's now destroyed an incredibly expensive spy car for no reason. So why did we need that scene again? There's no sense of threat or tension, nothing at stake; Bond couldn't give a poo poo that someone's trying to kill him. Same with the sequence where he ambles through Blofeld's secret base disinterestedly one-shotting goons as if he's used an invincibility cheat. It's not cool, it's just dull.

As for the contortions the writers have to go through to justify the whole "Bond's previously-unmentioned foster brother was actually the mastermind behind everything that happened in the previous three movies and did it all to gently caress with him personally!" revelation... it's utter horseshit. The whole thing is a joyless, boring pile of shite where everyone involved is half-assedly going through the motions for the money.

In some ways it's actually worse than Diamonds Are Forever in that respect because at least DAF didn't vanish up its own arse into a black hole of pretension.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Small Strange Bird
Sep 22, 2006

Merci, chaton!

Andorra posted:

I think it's weird how they turned a one-movie origin story into a tetralogy origin story.
An origin story that's also an ending story, at that. We go from Bond-as-rookie through Bond-as-burned-out-washed-up-cynic to Bond-has-had-enough-of-this-poo poo-and-is-walking-away, and there's really nothing more that can be done with the Craig version of 007 other than have another reboot and start over.

Preferably with new writers.

Small Strange Bird
Sep 22, 2006

Merci, chaton!
I didn't particularly like Skyfall, but I thought it was interesting in that it portrayed Bond as a man who utterly failed at every task he was assigned and was reduced to an emotionally broken husk, yet still 'won' by being alive when the series reset button got hit at the end.

It's a complete inversion of the "men want to be him" ideal of 007 - who would want to be this hosed-up loser? Yet it was the most financially successful Bond film to date. Go figure.

Small Strange Bird
Sep 22, 2006

Merci, chaton!

Ali Alkali posted:

Thunderball is still fine compared to most films that came after it
If Kevin McClory had had his way, there would have been a Thunderball remake every year. Bond would have been trapped in an endless cycle of repeating the same plot over and over... wait.

  • Locked thread