Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
 
  • Locked thread
Main Paineframe
Oct 27, 2010

Scionix posted:

crazy idea here but how about we educate our citizens so they can distinguish "fake" news instead of attempting to censor news

The problem is that people don't want to distinguish fake news. No amount of education can get in the way of someone who desperately wants to believe. It's pretty easy for a fake story to be more attractive than reality could possibly be; even here, an Onion story posted without attribution or links usually tricks a few people before someone gets suspicious and punches the first few lines into Google.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Main Paineframe
Oct 27, 2010

Tunicate posted:

CNN employees were deep enough in bed with Hillary's campaign to slip her debate questions, and they literally interviewed their own cameraman when covering the anti-Trump protests.

Both of those are more 'garbage news' aligned than 'left aligned', but definitely slanted.

On the other hand, they hired Ledanowski while he was still on the campaign's payroll, specifically so they could have a Trump mouthpiece.

Main Paineframe
Oct 27, 2010

SMILLENNIALSMILLEN posted:

The debate question was an audience member telling a paid Clinton surrogate that they were going to ask a question and them passing it onto the clinton campaign, wasn't it?

It was a CNN employee who was on a leave of absence from CNN because she was working for Hillary's campaign

how she got the question is still unknown. CNN insists they had nothing to do with it and that she must have gotten the question directly from the folks running the debate. some reporters said they saw her talking with people in the crowds and suggested that maybe she got it directly from the audience member who submitted it; that one is probably horseshit. afaik no one's ever managed to scrape together evidence or confirmation for any of those theories, and everyone implicated has denied any involvement or wrongdoing, including Brazile herself. she didn't even give a decent excuse, i think she was hoping the "maybe the Russians put some fake emails in with the real ones" talking point would catch on so she wouldn't have to

Main Paineframe
Oct 27, 2010

Sebadoh Gigante posted:

Saw this list and it calls New Republic, National Review, and Jacobin click bait.

https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1xDDmbr54qzzG8wUrRdxQl_C1dixJSIYqQUaXVZBqsJs/htmlview

Also Fox News, but calling it click bait isn't really accurate either.

sounds accurate to me

Main Paineframe
Oct 27, 2010

Potato Salad posted:

Then re-hire the human team :colbert: Or have FB buy / contract Snopes.

(I'm aware that's probably not going to happen)

FB don't give a gently caress, they just want to minimize the amount of complaining while driving traffic by showing people what they want to see

  • Locked thread