|
The far-right's underlying message is that everybody secretly believes all their stuff anyway but only the enlightened few are brave enough to talk openly about how Jews are parasites (but when they do most people actually agree with them even if they pretend not to). The left's underlying message these days seems to be that they are a tiny, ineffectual minority betrayed at every turn by untrustworthy liberals and scheming conservatives. Funnily enough this narrative does not resonate with people.
|
# ¿ Dec 30, 2016 23:33 |
|
|
# ¿ May 15, 2024 17:21 |
|
It's possible that the concept privilege is a useful tool to understand society but not, actually, a particularly useful way to persuade people that you are right.
|
# ¿ Jan 2, 2017 02:36 |
|
OwlFancier posted:Yes because my big complaint with the alt right is that they're too harsh in their wording, not that they're nazi apologists. The irony is that the alt-right moderate their language instead of saying what they really think all the loving time.
|
# ¿ Jan 2, 2017 04:33 |
|
OwlFancier posted:You've had this explained to you many times and you aren't getting it. So when you tell somebody to "check their privilege" in response to a statement they make, there's no element of judgement there? You do not actually believe this.
|
# ¿ Jan 2, 2017 04:49 |
|
OwlFancier posted:I haven't ever done that so I wouldn't know. Okay, but now imagine that you're speaking to actual human beings.
|
# ¿ Jan 2, 2017 04:59 |
|
|
# ¿ May 15, 2024 17:21 |
|
Dr. Fishopolis posted:Let's stop pretending for a moment that you're the spokesman for hard luck white america. You're clearly personally offended by the idea of privilege, and by others asking you to consider your own. Why is that? Why does it matter? As we've established above, there's no moral stigma associated with the injunction to check privilege, so it presumably comes down to a matter of personal preference among rational actors or something.
|
# ¿ Jan 2, 2017 05:07 |