|
Good to see Eli Valley around here again, shame it has to be in the context of Steve Bannon.
|
# ¿ Feb 11, 2017 04:00 |
|
|
# ¿ May 15, 2024 23:27 |
|
If that executive order (it wasn't a law you nitwit, laws are passed by the legislation) is unconstitutional, then yes, acting in violation of a court order is in fact illegal. It's called "contempt of court," and I'd expect you of all people to be familiar with contempt.
|
# ¿ Feb 11, 2017 21:06 |
|
Apple Pie Hubbub posted:1 Also please stop being willfully dense, people. We know what the Republican talking points are so we know what Lester was trying to illustrate, even if he's such a poo poo cartoonist that he failed. Goo day,
|
# ¿ Feb 12, 2017 00:51 |
|
Xander77 posted:Personally, I only find out about Republican talking points in this thread, so... Fair enough I'll work through it step by step: Antonin Scalia was famous for his doctrine of Constitutional Originalism, aka Original Intent. This doctrine only exists in contrast with common law interpretations of the Constitution, which admit that society is not static, or at the very least is so complex that no legal document can be written to account for every possible interaction. When ambiguities crop up, judges interpret the letter of the law in such a way that you get a sane outcome, at least until the law is amended to clear up that ambiguity. Originalism is basically the same thing, but with a different idea of what outcomes are sane (Decriminalizing sodomy? Why not decriminalize murder while you're at it!) and a spurious claim to being Actually Objective. It's this claim to being Actually Objective that Republicans love, because without an objective principle firmly rooted in the past, you're just being arbitrary! Never mind that Originalism, if it were sincere, would be utterly silent on ambiguities stemming from technological changes, or worse demand completely insane results. The GOP talks a lot about the Constitution being bedrock and rock-solid and immovable as a mountain and the like, in this case playing on: quote:The saying "solid as the Rock of Gibraltar" is used to describe an entity that is very safe or firm.[9] Considering that rhetoric, there's no way that wasn't supposed to be the Rock of Gibraltar, especially since insisting that it's an iceberg results in a nonsensical cartoon. It's still a BAD cartoon, since it's just illustrating a talking point without adding anything, it relies on you already being familiar with the talking point, and Lester committed the Art Crime of drawing something with neither a reference nor practice. Hope this helps someone appreciate this mediocre politoon.
|
# ¿ Feb 12, 2017 03:57 |
|
euphronius posted:Lol wow are you wrong The post doesn't say that it's RIGHT, just that that's the point the cartoon is arguing.
|
# ¿ Feb 12, 2017 16:29 |
|
SwitchbladeKult posted:Dude it is blue and surrounded by comic short hand sea symbols like little wavy line waves and wavy line seagulls. There is absolutely no way Lester meant it as the Rock of Gibraltar unless he thinks the Rock of Gibraltar is an iceberg (which is totally within the realm of possibilities for this wife beating hack). I've shown the cartoon to several people without context, one said "Is that supposed to be the Rock of Gibraltar or an iceberg?" Another said "Conservatives think the Constitution is carved in stone" and when I asked him what the specific object in the thought bubble was he said "Rock of Gibraltar, if the Rock of Gibraltar was blue and in the ocean." It's a poo poo illustration for a poo poo cartoon, but it doesn't help anybody to insist that the opposition is mush for brains and are completely unintelligible. Lester isn't terribly bright in justifying his villainy, but his motivation and reasoning are usually pretty clear.
|
# ¿ Feb 12, 2017 17:23 |
|
SwitchbladeKult posted:So your friend basically just said "The Rock of Gibraltar if the Rock of Gibraltar was an iceberg". I'm not sure how that helps your case. Okay I'm going to back up, I'm not 100% sure where we're disagreeing. Is your point that the illustration looks more like an iceberg than the Rock of Gibraltar? Because I agree with that. I'm saying that Lester's intention was so clearly the Rock of Gibraltar that multiple people have specifically said that, in spite of the fact that the drawing looks more like an iceberg. It's like Ramirez's "let's raise this" cartoon. The metaphor fails on half a dozen levels, but we say it's a failure precisely because we can tell what Ramirez intended. Otherwise we wouldn't still be talking about it.
|
# ¿ Feb 12, 2017 17:58 |
|
Farecoal posted:So is coal, technically! Apparently not so much!
|
# ¿ Feb 12, 2017 19:27 |
|
Sandpuppy posted:Is that Lester? Looks like his lettering style on that sign. And this seems like the kind of topic that would rustle his scales. I almost didn't recognize him without the Gulf shirt and chicken sandwich, but yes: https://twitter.com/exg001/status/829432795416166400
|
# ¿ Feb 13, 2017 03:52 |
|
Samurai Sanders posted:There are a million cartoons like this and I am sure there will be a million more, but I am still really not clear on what happens if Trump is raving nuts, everyone around him knows it, and he demands to access the nukes. He gets access to the nukes. The checks and balances are literally "don't elect a loving lunatic, like, make really sure you don't." Enjoy!
|
# ¿ Feb 13, 2017 23:55 |
|
Let's be fair, the US has had its fair share of false alarms too. Like the time they left a training program in the NORAD computers. Or that one time the moon rose.
|
# ¿ Feb 14, 2017 00:16 |
|
Gay Abortions gonna need a Densest Motherfucker category for 2017.
|
# ¿ Feb 14, 2017 17:22 |
|
NoEyedSquareGuy posted:"So, where is all your people?" Putting food on your family, duh.
|
# ¿ Feb 15, 2017 21:05 |
|
.Edward Penischin posted:LOL. Glenn McCoy deleted his Facebook account. Delete your Cagle account next, McCoy.
|
# ¿ Feb 16, 2017 19:37 |
|
This is so bad on so many levels. e: lmao that's supposed to be Putin on the horse it's a pro-Russian cartoon e2: I think? Maybe Zudin is just a really bad cartoonist: Abyssal Squid fucked around with this message at 22:48 on Feb 16, 2017 |
# ¿ Feb 16, 2017 22:40 |
|
Cloud Potato posted:Just came across this on my Twitter: I love it, though a nice dash of salt in the wound would've been to point out that India has had more successful Mars missions than Russia.
|
# ¿ Feb 16, 2017 23:44 |
|
Platystemon posted:I think the original was intended to be sincere congratulations. Probably, but I'm still enjoying India being sassy about ISRO's successes.
|
# ¿ Feb 17, 2017 02:00 |
|
"lol Trump is so easy to make fun of think how hilarious the politoons will be" *uninterrupted wall of YUGE FAKE NEWS! SAD!*
|
# ¿ Feb 20, 2017 13:33 |
|
Teketeketeketeke posted:"bras" They're not teaching cursive in school these days apparently, this generation smh
|
# ¿ Feb 22, 2017 16:50 |
|
FishBulb posted:Yes they are I'm just teasing because it's an absolutely useless skill that I clung to well into middle school . But also because cursive "b" has the same weird high-connect line that v and w have, which turns an i into an r.
|
# ¿ Feb 22, 2017 17:34 |
|
FaradayCage posted:Please elaborate because what the gently caress.
|
# ¿ Feb 24, 2017 01:18 |
|
Okay in Glenn Mccoy's defense, I had to go back to 2009 to find a straightforward "why cold" cartoon: Though the last update was in 2015 (lazy lazy Saint Sputnik) and also this came up:
|
# ¿ Feb 24, 2017 04:40 |
|
Angepain posted:Now this could just be 'let's draw all them asians with slitty eyes' but I'm just going to tell myself it's Undertale fanart and be done with it. Korean assassins coming for your husband are probably harder than comedy skeletons to defeat with the power of Love, though. KJU is just doing his best to increase his LOVE. https://twitter.com/undertale/status/367261618700161025?lang=en
|
# ¿ Feb 24, 2017 15:49 |
|
It's been a while but there's a new Gatis Sluka!quote:Multi-Speed Europe e: I love so much how the villain here is an otter, especially because otters are predators of echinoderms. Abyssal Squid fucked around with this message at 16:10 on Feb 24, 2017 |
# ¿ Feb 24, 2017 16:05 |
|
"Everyone's trying to get out of Washington, and we're the only schmucks trying to get in." "Imagine being this distraught over traffic being light" - Matt Walsh, apparently
|
# ¿ Feb 24, 2017 19:14 |
|
Xander77 posted:I said this about twitter in the past, but how the gently caress is that site a thing. A seemingly popular thing. I tried finding a less lovely version of that scene but that was the only site that came up. It's probably some SEO trash like iFunny, but I'm too lazy to keep digging around for the sake of a one-liner.
|
# ¿ Feb 24, 2017 22:00 |
|
Brexit is being negotiated by NYT ghosts?????????????
|
# ¿ Feb 25, 2017 11:25 |
|
Vib Rib posted:Oh my god I wish I'd never posted that comic. You didn't even post a Penny Arcade, I'm sorry you don't deserve this.
|
# ¿ Feb 26, 2017 01:26 |
|
Saint Sputnik posted:Be prepared for at least one "Game over man, game over!" cartoon in the next few days You can take people off your ignore list, you know. Unless you're a cool kid like me and afflicted by a bug that prevents that.
|
# ¿ Feb 26, 2017 19:10 |
|
mandatory lesbian posted:but it can decrease? where does the heat go tho... If you have a red hot nickel ball and a tub of ice, the heat from the ball will go into the ice and turn it into a tub of lukewarm water. Total energy is the same, but the nickel ball isn't red hot anymore so it can't melt anything else. You can't cool a drink with the ice that is now water. I never took physics so I might be explaining it all wrong or missing something important, I just like Maxwell's demon over the messy desk analogy.
|
# ¿ Mar 4, 2017 19:23 |
|
Hey. Imagine Lisa Benson drawing pinups. Imagine Bob Gorrell drawing pinups. Imagine Bob Gorrell's B^U lying seductively, giving you what he imagines to be bedroom eyes.
|
# ¿ Mar 5, 2017 01:31 |
|
SSNeoman posted:...Soda tax is bad? Why? Liberals like it therefore it's The Worst (for once leftists and the GOP agree).
|
# ¿ Mar 5, 2017 19:06 |
|
Fulchrum posted:For once? I knew that was the wrong wording, I should have said "on this" instead, but
|
# ¿ Mar 5, 2017 19:51 |
|
Manuel Calavera posted:"Life's hard for a Conservative Brony" World Famous W posted:Don't google Jay Naylor. Just don't. Erring on the side of linking this awful thing because it's pornographically violent. Yes, the unprovoked murderer (whose sine qua non is that he fucks his sister) is supposed to be the good guy.
|
# ¿ Mar 8, 2017 08:48 |
|
Gosh, those traps sure are obvious. You'd have to be some kind of idiot to fall for them. Some kind of idiot with an irrational, unquenchable loathing for Obama.
|
# ¿ Mar 9, 2017 20:49 |
|
Wouldn't have taken McKee for an OSINT advocate. (Yes I know he's Old Man Yells At Some Gizmo'ing here but it's a broken clock moment.)
|
# ¿ Mar 12, 2017 21:35 |
|
Donkey sees elephant traveling, says it's a foul, then ref calls the foul. This is supposed to be offensive somehow. McKee I don't know poo poo about balls but I can still tell you illustrated the elephant committing a foul.
|
# ¿ Mar 15, 2017 20:14 |
|
Ruzihm posted:Worker refuses to be alienated from the product of her labor? That's much closer to the idea than "sharing is bad." The lesson for kids is "sharing is good, also labor is a thing to share just as much as material goods." Avenging_Mikon posted:And that's fine, but don't ASK people if they want any if you're not going to actually share! Just go ahead and keep it to yourself! drat bird. It's a story for children! You need to spell out for them the connection between refusing to help someone and them refusing to share the fruits of their labor in return! Seriously people, we made fun of Ted Cruz for missing the point of Green Eggs and Ham but some of y'all...
|
# ¿ Mar 17, 2017 22:48 |
|
Lest we forget!
|
# ¿ Mar 18, 2017 17:45 |
|
|
# ¿ May 15, 2024 23:27 |
|
Yes Lester we know you're an exemplar of the Dunning-Kruger Effect, you can stop bragging about it.
|
# ¿ Mar 18, 2017 19:48 |