|
The commercial is so bad I can't help but suspect they knowingly made it the way they did to cause controversy.
|
# ¿ Apr 5, 2017 23:20 |
|
|
# ¿ May 16, 2024 02:56 |
|
Gee, Chip, it's almost like Obama never actually really declared "War on Coal" and it's just the way we loving make energy has changed.
|
# ¿ Apr 8, 2017 01:07 |
|
Jay Rust posted:(I do think his art is below average)
|
# ¿ Apr 10, 2017 21:27 |
|
As a cartoonist, wouldn't it make more sense to draw an elephant in the room to represent said elephant in the room? Also, an elephant wouldn't be in someone's lap. You know I just don't think this is a very good use of that metaphor.
|
# ¿ Apr 11, 2017 02:58 |
|
seiferguy posted:I'm not going to say that right wing cartoonists (mainly Lester, McCoy and Ramirez) are racist because they always want to poo poo on Obama's legacy. I'm sure there's a racial aspect, but I think it's more that their current president is realllly unpopular and even people in his party hate em (although they'll go along with him because he mostly gives what the party wants). So it's a lot easier to make fun of Obama's legacy being destroyed than to prop Trump up as an actual good human being like Branco and Garrison do. I think the Obama bashing comes from a lot of places, really, but I think that's one. Their elevation of Reagan to presidential sainthood has helped enable 30+ years of the Republican agenda.
|
# ¿ Apr 12, 2017 19:17 |
|
Captain_Maclaine posted:
|
# ¿ Apr 13, 2017 18:22 |
|
loquacius posted:I'm (pedantically) mad about the way everyone's talking about the United thing as an "overbooking" issue, because it's worse than that
|
# ¿ Apr 13, 2017 22:44 |
|
What America needs is an unrestrained military, free from civilian oversight to do what it wants.
|
# ¿ Apr 17, 2017 18:44 |
|
21 Muns posted:The cartoon literally doesn't depict it as bad, though? It completely downplays any nonconsensual aspect and doesn't even portray the woman Trump is groping as a person. We're supposed to think "gee, those reporters sure are backwards, thinking that Sex Is Bad and Violence Is Good". Here is my dog, who is a little chunky. Murdstone fucked around with this message at 18:21 on Apr 19, 2017 |
# ¿ Apr 19, 2017 18:12 |
|
whomupclicklike posted:It's by Lubchansky
|
# ¿ Apr 19, 2017 18:20 |
|
It seemed to me Horsey was taking swipes at the superficiality of a lot of the event-goers. I don't think he was being particularly critical of the event or of Millennials, though.
|
# ¿ Apr 20, 2017 21:34 |
|
AShamefulDisplay posted:Is there anyone who even holds up Bill Clinton as a moral paragon? The "best" I've ever seen was my dad whose whole thing was "he was better than the guy before him and he drat sure was better than the guy after him, who cares if he got blown in the Oval office?"
|
# ¿ Apr 22, 2017 18:18 |
|
D.N. Nation posted:So, yeah, it goes without saying: no jeans. Why it's almost like Mike Lester is a wife-beating jerk who can't bother to educate himself on anything and instead relies on blaring on the dogwhistle until his cheeks are as puffy as his fat loving gut!
|
# ¿ Apr 27, 2017 19:26 |
|
Ularg posted:But they can just use their smartphones to look up funny pictures online, though. I've just never seen a kid ever look at a paper for almost any reason, even back before smartphones were a thing.
|
# ¿ Apr 29, 2017 22:51 |
|
Hey guys before you judge remember that Garrison made a search on the Internet about this.
|
# ¿ Apr 30, 2017 18:25 |
|
I know there is a proud tradition of cartoonists not understanding the source material/messing up metaphors in this thread but wow.
|
# ¿ May 1, 2017 20:14 |
|
Internet Webguy posted:1
|
# ¿ May 2, 2017 18:52 |
|
I thought the recent discussion of "Deep State," with regard to the US and probably a lot of other Western countries at least, was more a reference to resistance to extreme and sudden change due to the large size of government agencies and the people with long-term career positions within them. Basically bureaucratic inertia. Also the sharing of information among those career-types on the Russia-Trump connections before the inauguration to ensure that stuff wouldn't just disappear. Obviously, people like Garrison have latched onto this and given it a different meaning.
|
# ¿ May 3, 2017 18:37 |
|
Jurgan posted:I assume what he meant, based on his comments about "location," was not "gently caress my constituents if they didn't vote for me," but rather "these are out-of-state protesters." Still a dumb argument. What I really think he meant is those were a bunch of liberals from the liberal side of the county that's in his district and they won't vote for him anyways so gently caress what they think. Maybe he meant a lot of them were college students and don't actually vote there, but the "gently caress what they and anyone who does not vote for me think" part still stands.
|
# ¿ May 5, 2017 18:30 |
|
Xenoveritas posted:It does, and apparently the Senate is planning on just scrapping the House version and writing their own, but it's still going to happen. It's a long way to go from this to a bill going to Trump's desk. Not impossible, but the fight isn't over.
|
# ¿ May 5, 2017 20:24 |
|
duz posted:No matter the outcome, it doesn't mean it never happened and that Obama should never talk about it. It's overall a really weird way to make a comic about the bill.
|
# ¿ May 5, 2017 21:09 |
|
Cat Mattress posted:This one in particular is especially loathsome, because the author goes to the trouble of telling they have a good reason for coming, that it's a life or death issue for them, and still draws that. Not so different from today, really.
|
# ¿ May 6, 2017 18:20 |
|
You know this makes me wonder, when was the last time a place like Liberty University or whatever has invited, say, Bill Maher or someone like that to speak?
|
# ¿ May 10, 2017 07:03 |
|
Zombie Dachshund posted:Liberty U. invited Bernie Sanders to speak in September 2015, gotta give credit it's due
|
# ¿ May 11, 2017 02:10 |
|
Orabilis posted:It's the Eiffel Tower in a burqa.
|
# ¿ May 11, 2017 07:19 |
|
Bicyclops posted:He's a smarmy rear end in a top hat, but that doesn't indicate which side of the establishment Republican/Trump divide he falls on.
|
# ¿ May 12, 2017 04:15 |
|
Ziv Zulander posted:Is drinking vanilla extract a step above or below drinking mouthwash?
|
# ¿ May 14, 2017 04:33 |
|
Branco will have an ugly Hillary saying "How dare he be so careless with classified information!" while behind her is a box marked "Private Server with Classified Information."
|
# ¿ May 16, 2017 00:44 |
|
Remember when Obama had a meeting? That was crazy!
|
# ¿ May 18, 2017 21:32 |
|
Man, Kal is good.
|
# ¿ May 19, 2017 19:23 |
|
Jurgan posted:What has definitely changed is that people see the government having a responsibility to provide health care. PPACA has created an expectation that everyone have health care, and the free market "if you can't afford it, tough poo poo" philosophy is dead. Yes, there are still some people who believe that, but no one campaigns on it. Paul Ryan would love to scrap all government involvement in health care, but he knows that's incredibly unpopular today, so they claim their plan will cover more people than the ACA. Then they have to defend it on its merits rather than just say "it's not the government's business." The conversation has shifted from "should we ensure that everyone has coverage" to "what's the best way to cover everyone?" There's no going back from that. Single-payer has a chance today because it's no longer about "free market vs. government regulation" but about "efficient vs. inefficient government regulation." A large number of people (who vote) don't really care if everyone is covered. They care about how much they pay. A lot of them don't want to think that's the kind of person they are, but that's the truth. They will take the Republican spin that it will all work out somehow and "give it a chance" because it's what they want to believe. The Republicans do not and will not have to argue "What's the best way to cover everyone." They will instead argue "What's the best way to help your personal bottom line?"
|
# ¿ May 23, 2017 19:24 |
|
Sandpuppy posted:14
|
# ¿ May 26, 2017 20:06 |
|
KillerQueen posted:Did DDees do politoons before he went coocoo banaynays? I'd be interested in seeing that. He did Sesame Street books. Seriously.
|
# ¿ May 27, 2017 00:40 |
|
Shangri-Law School posted:One year after they inexplicably gave the prize to Michael Ramirez, the National Cartoonists Society has just given the Reuben Award to Ann Telnaes.
|
# ¿ May 28, 2017 19:57 |
|
There are many things I hate about Trump, but I will never forgive him for forcing me to support Kathy Griffin.
|
# ¿ May 31, 2017 18:24 |
|
Vib Rib posted:Not that this is in any way a new trend (or even a partisan one) but man with all this poo poo going on in the world, domestically and abroad, every single loving day, this many cartoonists think the most pressing commentary is on a comedian making a joke they got offended by? I won't say I've seen it here so far, but sometimes a few actually can come up with a clever one that's not just repeating the image of her holding the head but it's her head or showing Trump holding her head or whatever.
|
# ¿ Jun 1, 2017 01:04 |
|
Cloud Potato posted:Evening Standard:
|
# ¿ Jun 1, 2017 19:36 |
|
The really awful thing to think about to me is that he has never and will never experience any consequences for anything, ever. The worst thing that might happen is he might not get reelected, and then he goes home to his millions and makes even more money.
|
# ¿ Jun 3, 2017 18:58 |
|
Funny there are no big mining interests. Hm.
|
# ¿ Jun 6, 2017 04:47 |
|
|
# ¿ May 16, 2024 02:56 |
|
Ramos posted:Get hosed, Republicans and especially Trump's administration love wrecking and shutting things down, not Democrats.
|
# ¿ Jun 6, 2017 23:16 |