|
I, Lutfi al-Uthman, will remain with the Taifas! The Christians are puny before our might! France shall fall to the forces of Al-Andalus!
|
# ¿ May 19, 2017 09:53 |
|
|
# ¿ May 16, 2024 03:41 |
|
Frionnel posted:Either we give them rights or bring them to Islam, this status quo promoted by the merchants will lead us to disaster. Hmm, you're right. This has to end somewhere, and fast! I, Lutfi al-Uthman of the New Taifas, hereby propose that in order to stave off any further rebellion we are to acknowledge and formalise the Dhimmi's rights before the Sultan, as well as the rights of any Qarbiyan Dhimmi that may arise due to the Merchants' efforts in the west. The rights of worship and language of all Dhimmi are to be protected in return for loyalty and a standard Jizya tax. Let Humanism become the future for Al-Andalus!
|
# ¿ May 24, 2017 22:24 |
|
I, Lutfi al-Uthman, will remain with the New Taifas! We've already squandered the opportunity to invade France once, I will not allow us to squander it again!
|
# ¿ May 30, 2017 23:02 |
|
TildeATH posted:Proposing Olé -- Conquer Iberia first and foremost and then take back historically Muslim lands like Corsica I, Lutfi al-Uthman, of the New Taifas, endorse this proposition! With so few friends we really don't need to alienate the few friends that we have, even if the slights of the Almoravids are many.
|
# ¿ Jun 1, 2017 12:42 |
|
How about a proposal? When - not if, WHEN - the French-Almoravid Alliance kicks us in the nutsack, can we not just throw the "Let's attack our oldest ally in pure pettiness"-faction into the Oubliette? I can't in any way whatsoever see any gain from this decision, and I am the one raving on and on about establishing the Rhine as the new Islamic border into Europe which might just be the only thing the French-Almoravids stood in the way of.
|
# ¿ Jun 2, 2017 00:22 |
|
Mr_Autoshades posted:
I, Lutfi al-Uthman of the New Taifas, joyously endorse this proposal! It is good to see some common sense amongst my Taifa brethren for once.
|
# ¿ Jun 4, 2017 02:38 |
|
Hashim posted:Also, I didn't see this mentioned anywhere, but if the Majlis wants to get involved in the coming religious wars in Europe, we can join either the Evangelical Union (Protestants) or Bavaria's league (Catholics). Alternatively, we could just wait for it to break out then attack, but then without our own allies, essentially what the Coming Storm Act proposes. I, Lutfi al-Uthman of the New Taifas, say that we Aim Opportunistically rather than joining either side of the conflict. By allying with Bavaria we're merely limiting ourselves to not getting anything out of it, which is far beneath what Andalusia should strive for. Let them have their conflict! We'll merely mop up what remains when France already has bled themselves dry. Luhood fucked around with this message at 11:28 on Jun 4, 2017 |
# ¿ Jun 4, 2017 11:26 |
|
Hashim posted:There isn't a Muslim reformation, but there is the potential for the Sunni world to be divided into two big blocs - the Armenian and the Andalusi - later on down the road. Depends on a few things happening though, like us refusing to bend to the Vakhtani Caliphate. Incidentally, what would have been the effects of acknowledging his authority? I mean with the choice already made it shouldn't be any danger in revealing it to us, no?
|
# ¿ Jun 4, 2017 21:11 |
|
Lord Cyrahzax posted:
Agreed! This so called "Sultan" needs to be torn down from his throne, his mother thrown to the French, and the New Mubazirun castrated and sent to force-labour on the plantations in al-Qarbiya! ----- And with that roleplaying out of the way, what faction needs to be in power for us to select Humanist ideas? With all of this nonsense about heathens and heretics within our borders we really need some way to erect a proper Dhimmi system to ensure they won't try to stab us the moment we look the other way. Luhood fucked around with this message at 19:42 on Jun 8, 2017 |
# ¿ Jun 8, 2017 19:40 |
|
I dunno, as much as I want to make the reasonable choice I've been playing a raving, warmongering madman all this time. I can't really stop now with a good conscience.
|
# ¿ Jun 9, 2017 08:32 |
|
Frionnel posted:And yet you didn't support my war against Morocco! Not raving warmongering madman enough if you ask me I'm a raving, warmongering madman against the RIGHT people! Or do you think the Rhine sounds like a reasonable border of al-Andalus?
|
# ¿ Jun 9, 2017 10:21 |
|
I, Lutfi al-Uthman of the New Taifas, propose the Cutting the French act. We are to declare war upon France in a moment of their weakness, NOT to seize any lands but to free lands from French yoke.
|
# ¿ Jun 9, 2017 20:27 |
|
Captain Oblivious posted:And how useful would an alliance with them have been at that time, precisely? We still had a large amount of Iberia left to reconquer, allying Morocco at that time would have been at best useless (if we opted not to attack the powers in Iberia subordinate to France) by virtue of blunting our ability to act, and at worst actively counter productive when we did it anyway and they chose France over us! Except that's not how alliances work. Morocco was allied with France, not at the time still independent Castille/Leon/Whatever. So if we attacked them for our proper Iberian clay France would join them in the defence, and at worst Morocco wouldn't be callable to our war. In the meanwhile Morocco would actually be a strong defence against France, seeing how the AI tend to favour defensive wars over offensive and the AI wouldn't be interested in starting a war that could break their alliance. Like I've said previously, allying Morocco would be the worst offensive move we could've done if our goal is the Rhine - which for most of us it isn't. Defensively it could've been one of our best moves since it gave France much greater reason not to try anything untoward. That said the alliance wouldn't really be useful any longer considering Castille is a vassal and thus would drag them into our war with France, but still!
|
# ¿ Jun 11, 2017 20:17 |
|
Fellow Majils! I, Lutfi al-Uthman of the New Taifas, hear you all calling out for us to ally a strong Muslim power to strengthen our position. Now, I only ask of you one thing: Please point out the possible candidates for such a things! As you'll soon find, there are none. There are currently only three strong Muslim Powers in the Mediterranean that aren't us: Morocco, Tunisia, and the Armenians. Two of those three are our Rivals and Enemies, and the third already is our Ally. I suppose that lavender-coloured one north of Armenia is possible, but what good will they be when France and Morocco comes breathing down our necks? What we need to do is stop having our heads stuck so far up the Dar al-Islam and start realizing how desperate we are for help. How desperate we are for allies. Any allies. As such, I propose the simply named Bavarian Alliance Act. We need to ally with Bavaria as a means to protect ourselves from the French and our so called "Muslim Brothers" in Morocco. Only then, when we are safe from the overbearing sword of our rivalling neighbours, can we start even thinking about rebuilding.
|
# ¿ Jun 14, 2017 18:27 |
|
I, Lutfi al-Uthman of the New Taifas, propose the "Free our Dhimmi" Act! Should they be found in a precarious position we are to attack France with the goal of having them release Castille and if possible Corsica-Sardinia.
|
# ¿ Jul 7, 2017 16:21 |
|
Frionnel posted:
|
# ¿ Jul 11, 2017 20:01 |
|
Soup du Jour posted:
Scratch that, new post shows I have changed my mind! Luhood fucked around with this message at 17:13 on Jul 12, 2017 |
# ¿ Jul 11, 2017 21:21 |
|
Seeing how Soup du Jour's "Iberian Consolidation Act" was revoked in favour of Rodyle's proposition my vote is suddenly free again. Mountaineer posted:I propose we secure an alliance with Mali. They might be willing to help attack Morocco, so I think it's worth pursuing. While they are unlikely to be much help in any of our other wars, it can't hurt to broaden our alliance network. As such I, Lutfi al-Uthman of the New Taifas, will support seeking an alliance with the West Africans. We need every ally we can get if we are to ever resist the French menace, not to mention if we want to steal the Colonies from beneath the very noses of the Moroccans. If possible I will also support Rodyle's "The Sevilla Do Like It" Act, but my premier vote is with Mountaineer in case I don't get a second one.
|
# ¿ Jul 12, 2017 17:06 |
|
Frionnel posted:
I, Lutfi al-Uthman of the New Taifas, support this suggestion! I'd also like it if we were to add the Leonese and Catalans to our list of protected Dhimmi, but really I'll be supporting Humanism either way.
|
# ¿ Jul 14, 2017 21:59 |
|
Rodyle posted:
This sounds like a nice proposal!
|
# ¿ Jul 19, 2017 14:08 |
|
France is on its knees, and the Maghrebs are falling as their colonies one after another break free from their colonial masters at home. Only a firm militaristic hand can properly advise our sultan of sultans, and help him make use of the situation we now find ourselves in.
|
# ¿ Jul 24, 2017 21:10 |
|
Lord Cyrahzax posted:If Morocco isn't on the table here, there's nothing to discuss. Islam at home, empire abroad. Morocco is one of our Rivals unless I misremember, so they should be on the table as we want them to be. EDIT: In all my haste I forgot to vote... AJ_Impy posted:/ This looks like an intriguing proposal, and while I personally do think acknowledging them is more appropriate than force-converting them I also see the need of compromise if we want to get our stuff through.
|
# ¿ Jul 25, 2017 23:54 |
|
AJ_Impy posted:/ With these additions I don't really have anything to intervene with. Supported!
|
# ¿ Jul 26, 2017 22:27 |
|
I want to propose a simple act so that we the Taifas have something to fall back on should the coalition fail to bear fruit. But at the same time I know that if I propose a new act I will in fact withdraw my vote from the coalition and thus potentially ENSURE it will fail... Oh these dilemmas! Hashim, help me out here! Is my math correct or have I missed something? And if I have in fact missed something, and the coalition will succeed even without my vote, would it be rude of me to ask for 'bout an hour or so to write one up? Luhood fucked around with this message at 22:53 on Jul 26, 2017 |
# ¿ Jul 26, 2017 22:50 |
|
Hashim posted:As it stands, the Taifas will form most of the support in the 'Death to All Infidels' coalition with or without you, so it'll be fine for you to withdraw and propose your own policy so long as other Taifas don't start supporting the other coalition. The only problem currently facing the Death to Infidels coalition is that it has only two Ulema supporting it, so it needs at least one more Ulema vote for it to be tied with the current Ulema Madressa policy, and two more if it's to succeed without issue. So, as things currently stand, neither coalition will pass. Swell, thanks for the heads-up! I, Lutfi al-Uthman of the New Taifas, am proposing the Jizrunid Middle Sea Act. It consists of 1. We are to Vassalise Sardinia! If possible by Diplomacy (i.e. if we aren't at less than 50 Relationship already and if the button isn't X-d out with some massive amount against or something), and if not by Force! Thus we will secure our hold on the Middle Sea and secure the Jizrunid legacy by grabbing lands France stole from us ancient times ago. By doing this we secure large parts of the western Middle Sea under our rule by loyal subjects. Other proposals are already trying to deal with the Moroccan issue and with Oversea affairs, thus I feel it only proper that we too pull our weight. EDIT: Turns out converting the Shias is illegal under this administration. Luhood fucked around with this message at 23:44 on Jul 26, 2017 |
# ¿ Jul 26, 2017 23:18 |
|
Hashim posted:I pointed this out in a different policy, but this part of the proposal is illegal. Provinces can only be converted by policies when the Ulema are at least the second-largest faction, anything less than that and conversion is completely banned, except through coalitions. Oh! My mistake, I thought it meant that conversions are illegal If proposed by the Ulema! Never realized it meant "Completely", will change it at once!
|
# ¿ Jul 26, 2017 23:43 |
|
Before the great age of exploration we the Majils helped the sultan make and found our nation, and together we have ensured that Andalusia have thrived in both fortune and strife. Up until now! Now the sultan spits at our memory and curses our very establishment. Utman III has gone too far! I, Lutfi al-Uthman, sides with the Majils!
|
# ¿ Jul 31, 2017 15:32 |
|
As much as I'd like to blame everyone left, right and centre, I also know that right now we have other things to be worrying about. A vote for B is a vote for a stable Andalusia.
|
# ¿ Aug 4, 2017 02:12 |
|
Ralepozozaxe posted:Alright people, place your bets: Will Utman lose his member? I'm gonna go out on a wild-card and say he gains one!
|
# ¿ Aug 6, 2017 01:02 |
|
We're Taifas together, Taifas forever, we're nobles yet so much more!
|
# ¿ Aug 8, 2017 22:21 |
|
As much as I love both Innovative and Defensive ideas, we're in somewhat of a pickle with both Admin and Military right now. Ralepozozaxe posted:I propose The Devilishly good deal contract Thus I will endorse this proposal! Let's throw the Merchants a bone and have some money start flowing into our coffers!
|
# ¿ Aug 10, 2017 10:19 |
|
Ikasuhito posted:this raises a good point, why would anybody want to go to the colonies? it seems like that's a good way to get murdered and your home burned down every few years. each of our colonsy should consist of like 3 Guys. You kidding, right? I mean, have you seen our homeland recently? First the many wars under Utman III, then the greatest civil war in European history the Fitna during which we were invaded once again, and now finally the reign of Al-Mushin when we were once again invaded and had our asses collectively handed to us until our northern enemy got dogpiled by its many neighbours. Sure, the colonies get their fair share of warfare and invasions, but by large they're significantly better off there than in wartorn Iberia.
|
# ¿ Aug 12, 2017 16:35 |
|
Patter Song posted:If you're talking about how different they are, how about that they border a still large native empire holding half of Mexico in 1700? That sounds like something that could be very easily dealt with come Victoria, or even in EU4 if we stop trying to declare war on Moroccan colonies already.
|
# ¿ Aug 12, 2017 20:05 |
|
Hopefully not, it's a great thread!
|
# ¿ Sep 14, 2017 20:00 |
|
Woo, Al-Andalus is back! Glory to the Sultan and all that!
|
# ¿ Oct 14, 2017 09:03 |
|
Why can't Andalusia ever catch a break? Poor Jizrunids...
|
# ¿ Oct 15, 2017 19:19 |
|
Lord Cyrahzax posted:I propose the Andalusi Consolidation Act: I may be late to the party, but the Taifas have my vote and Cyrahzax has my vote!
|
# ¿ Oct 16, 2017 21:05 |
|
Y'know what, let's give as good as we get shall we? When we win over Morocco, force the Independence of some of her colonies! There is very little chance we actually manage to succeed in the war against the Gharbians, considering how difficult it will be to actually invade them without a navy. Let's deal with Morocco and then take on France, them we should manage to defeat without greater issue - specially when we're in a Golden Age.
|
# ¿ Oct 19, 2017 19:37 |
|
I propose the Andalusi Reconstruction Act! We are to, in no specific order:
|
# ¿ Oct 26, 2017 21:02 |
|
|
# ¿ May 16, 2024 03:41 |
|
We all did everything wrong... gently caress, I'm almost a bit sick to my stomach how many just want to see everything burn and seemingly take pleasure in it. I know it's all a game and all, but... gently caress.Hashim posted:If the sultan and Majlis wanted his head, they could come get it, That said, this man really deserves to be our Zuriman once this all finally breaks down. The sheer balls on this man.
|
# ¿ Nov 4, 2017 22:26 |