|
It would have been real cool to have pardoned Manning a few years ago when he was still going to be around to defend the decision and use the Office of the President to extend the protections that she will undoubtedly need. I mean, I applaud the decision, good job Obama, it was just done in the most spineless manner possible.
|
# ¿ Jan 17, 2017 23:51 |
|
|
# ¿ May 19, 2024 09:32 |
|
KaptainKrunk posted:She would have never been pardoned if Clinton won, at least under Obama. Eh. Theres no love lost between Hillary and Obama. He might have pardoned Chelsea anyways.
|
# ¿ Jan 18, 2017 02:32 |
|
eggyolk posted:Dude should've started some wars instead of trying to fix the economy and healthcare apparently. Fixing the economy and healthcare would have been pretty cool projects for him to work on. Shame.
|
# ¿ Jan 18, 2017 03:55 |
|
Endorph posted:obama would have been a good president if presidents were for 20 years and not 8 The best form of government is a benevolent dictator who has your best interests in mind. The worst form of government is a malevolent tyrant who actively hates you. The problem is its a bit of a coin flip which one you get, so we keep terms short on purpose.
|
# ¿ Jan 18, 2017 04:15 |
|
Vladimir Putin posted:The more I found out about the Bin Laden raid the more that I came to realize how special Obama is. The Bin Laden raid took a lot of guts because the downside risk was so great--so many things could have gone wrong including but not limited to Pakistan F-16's shooting down the helicopters or American jets shooting down Pakistani jets to defend the helos, the SEAL team taken captive, the whole SEAL team dying, a poo poo load of people dying but Bin Laden was never really there, a poo poo load of people dying but Bin Laden got away, the Seal team walked into a trap, a shitload of civilians getting killed in the operation, etc.... Im not contesting that the Bin Laden raid required real grit and leadership. My main complaint is that I wish he'd shown that level of determination for his domestic policies.
|
# ¿ Jan 18, 2017 05:05 |
|
The Saurus posted:The United States and the UK forced Libya to admit to the Lockerbie bombing despite the fact it was actually Syria because Reagan was too scared to challenge Assad's Dad back in the 80s, and had told everyone how Gadaffi was a reformed man, and a good guy now. Libya was now an ally in the region, a secular power and a trading partner. Then they backstabbed him and his son because Clinton managed to convince Obama of the neocon nonsense she still has a hard on for after decades of failure caused by it. Thats a whole lot of moving parts when US foreign policy in the region has typically been to swing a big dick around and dare someone to notice. Subtlety is not something I associate with US middle east policy. Like, this is the country who predicated a war with Iraq over the transparent accusation that they had WMDs. You would think the competent CIA you're hypothesizing here could have at least planted a few nuke parts here or there to save the embarrassment.
|
# ¿ Jan 18, 2017 08:54 |
|
|
# ¿ May 19, 2024 09:32 |
|
Frijolero posted:Hey remember when dumb rookie Donny Trump milked the hope of millions of Obama-weary Americans and then squandered his first 100 days because of his obvious ineptitude and garbage ideology? The more things change
|
# ¿ Mar 30, 2017 19:22 |