|
Shangri-Law School posted:The Bears will screw it all up. Two thirds, a fourth and a swap of #2 and #3 for Trubisky. Right on schedule.
|
#
?
Apr 28, 2017 02:01
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 8, 2024 22:35 |
|
|
this draft pick was solely about saving pace's job
|
|
#
?
Apr 28, 2017 02:03
|
|
|
R.D. Mangles posted:this draft pick was solely about saving pace's job Dude needs to start day 1.
|
|
#
?
Apr 28, 2017 02:05
|
|
|
R.D. Mangles posted:this draft pick was solely about saving pace's job I don't think that's how job saving works.
|
|
#
?
Apr 28, 2017 02:06
|
|
|
Sataere posted:I don't think that's how job saving works. he can't be fired until trubisky inevitably flames out-- bought himself a few years because the bears are going to win like 3 games next year
|
|
#
?
Apr 28, 2017 02:07
|
|
|
https://twitter.com/bustedcoverage/status/857751723317882880
|
|
#
?
Apr 28, 2017 02:12
|
|
|
R.D. Mangles posted:he can't be fired until trubisky inevitably flames out-- bought himself a few years because the bears are going to win like 3 games next year I meant to say drafting garbage players doesn't get you contract extensions. (I don't actually hate Trubisky. I just hate trading up for him. )
|
|
#
?
Apr 28, 2017 02:14
|
|
|
that's ok. he's going to sit and learn how to play winning football from mike glennon and mark sanchez
|
|
#
?
Apr 28, 2017 02:15
|
|
|
the Illini are going to have more win than the bears, again
|
|
#
?
Apr 28, 2017 02:19
|
|
|
Help me out here - why did the Bears trade up one spot for Turbisky? Who was going to take him at #2 instead? Obviously not SF. What team was event thinking about trading up to #2 for Turbisky?! I'm not even a Bears fan, but I live in the Chicago area and that whole sequence just confused the gently caress out of me. Taking Turbisky at #3 would seem questionable. Trading up one spot for him is just mind boggling. He would have been available at #3. No one was going to take him at #2.
|
|
#
?
Apr 28, 2017 02:21
|
|
|
LabyaMynora posted:Help me out here - why did the Bears trade up one spot for Turbisky? Who was going to take him at #2 instead? Obviously not SF. What team was event thinking about trading up to #2 for Turbisky?! it is because the bears are bad
|
|
#
?
Apr 28, 2017 02:23
|
|
|
They panicked that they weren't gonna get their guy and made a really dumb move.
|
|
#
?
Apr 28, 2017 02:30
|
|
|
pace shook, bears bad, water wet
|
|
#
?
Apr 28, 2017 02:31
|
|
|
the bears spent $18 million on a free agent quarterback and traded 3 draft picks for a quarterback, neither of which are as good as jay cutler
|
|
#
?
Apr 28, 2017 02:38
|
|
|
 4/27 was an inside job 
|
|
#
?
Apr 28, 2017 02:40
|
|
|
not only did the bears panic and overpay for a quarterback, they also were so stealthy about this same quarterback that they 1. didn't have him come in for personal workouts 2. didn't meet with him 3. didn't call him to tell him he was going to be drafted
|
|
#
?
Apr 28, 2017 03:00
|
|
|
SKULL.GIF posted:not only did the bears panic and overpay for a quarterback, they also were so stealthy about this same quarterback that they 1. didn't have him come in for personal workouts 2. didn't meet with him 3. didn't call him to tell him he was going to be drafted https://twitter.com/ZachZaidman/status/857775094206222337
|
|
#
?
Apr 28, 2017 03:16
|
|
|
All very normal things when picking someone #2 I'm sure.
|
|
#
?
Apr 28, 2017 03:16
|
|
|
https://twitter.com/patrickfinley/status/857769248063721472
|
|
#
?
Apr 28, 2017 03:23
|
|
|
OK, glad I was wrong about the Lions.
|
|
#
?
Apr 28, 2017 03:48
|
|
|
For real, I'm really happy with our pick there.
|
|
#
?
Apr 28, 2017 03:47
|
|
|
I love hating on the Bears as a Packer fan, but I respect the hell out of you guys. But I just don't know what the gently caress you're doing right now. I really don't. There's got to be something else at play.
|
|
#
?
Apr 28, 2017 03:51
|
|
|
As a Lions fan, after living through the Millen era, it's just nice to see someone else pick up the mantle of Division Clown Show.
|
|
#
?
Apr 28, 2017 03:53
|
|
|
Big Beef City posted:I love hating on the Bears as a Packer fan, but I respect the hell out of you guys. But I just don't know what the gently caress you're doing right now. I really don't. The GM is a moron and he's setting up the coaching staff (which was effectively forced upon him) to fail.
|
|
#
?
Apr 28, 2017 04:06
|
|
|
i'm sure glennon is looking forward to having a chorus of anthropomorphic beef sandwiches braying for dat trubinsky kid [he will be known exclusively as trubinsky in chicago for some reason] to get in there.
|
|
#
?
Apr 28, 2017 04:09
|
|
|
R.D. Mangles posted:i'm sure glennon is looking forward to having a chorus of anthropomorphic beef sandwiches braying for dat trubinsky kid [he will be known exclusively as trubinsky in chicago for some reason] to get in there. You're giving the WSCR caller audience entirely too much credit. They'll call him Toobinsky.
|
|
#
?
Apr 28, 2017 04:11
|
|
|
i never listen to sports radio, but tomorrow has the possibility to be the best chicago sports radio day since nine sacks in da first half
|
|
#
?
Apr 28, 2017 04:13
|
|
|
So I'd like to apologize for my rash statements and Bears Meatballishness without fully scouting out his play and intangibles. Mitch is gonna be the best QB of all time.
|
|
#
?
Apr 28, 2017 04:20
|
|
|
Lmao bears
|
|
#
?
Apr 28, 2017 04:22
|
|
|
Big Beef City posted:I love hating on the Bears as a Packer fan, but I respect the hell out of you guys. But I just don't know what the gently caress you're doing right now. I really don't. trying to save his job because next year is spent developing Mitch so you gotta give even more time than that
|
|
#
?
Apr 28, 2017 04:30
|
|
|
mastershakeman posted:trying to save his job because next year is spent developing Mitch so you gotta give even more time than that I don't know why people think Pace is in danger. Fox is the guy who is in win now mode. The Bears are a very patient organization traditionally. They only fired Emery and Trestman because they were an embarrassment. GMs generally get two coaches. Especially when they have to completely gut a roster. Don't get me wrong, I am really disappointed in the pick, but you can't tell me this roster isn't significantly better than it was two years ago.
|
|
#
?
Apr 28, 2017 04:40
|
|
|
Sataere posted:I don't know why people think Pace is in danger. Fox is the guy who is in win now mode. The Bears are a very patient organization traditionally. they have no QB and no wrs and no coach and no hope
|
|
#
?
Apr 28, 2017 04:53
|
|
|
Lol Bears - sucks for the fans. Please don't be a bust Davis. I'd hate to have it turn out that Foster is a lot better and all of the concerns didn't mean anything when I really wanted him,. Glad the Packers didn't get Watt or Foster. Maybe they get Cunningham tomorrow which also sucks.
|
|
#
?
Apr 28, 2017 04:59
|
|
|
i'm pretty sure the nfl will literally cease to exist before the bears are ever good again, we've got like what, 20 years or so before the horrifying barbarity of professional football ceases to be acceptable
|
|
#
?
Apr 28, 2017 05:13
|
|
|
T...t..t..Trubinsky?? nnnooo... this was my spot.... it was made for me.... 
|
|
#
?
Apr 28, 2017 05:20
|
|
|
Abugadu posted:T...t..t..Trubinsky?? Mother of God, why did I make that Photoshop...
|
|
#
?
Apr 28, 2017 05:23
|
|
|
They were so shook they gave up 3 picks to move up a spot. There is no defending that
|
|
#
?
Apr 28, 2017 05:30
|
|
|
GNU Order posted:They were so shook they gave up 3 picks to move up a spot. I mean there is a way to defend it. If you think this dude can be a top flight QB in the league then it's easily worth all the picks they gave up if they knew some other team was about to jump them.
|
|
#
?
Apr 28, 2017 05:32
|
|
|
if the packers draft or pick up austin carr as a UDFA i promise i will have an even more ridiculous meltdown in this thread, stay tuned
|
|
#
?
Apr 28, 2017 05:36
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 8, 2024 22:35 |
|
|
Was on a flight and missed the draft. Just landed and saw the Bears moves. Don't like it sir. Not one bit.
|
|
#
?
Apr 28, 2017 05:38
|
|
