|
In "wait, they didn't do that already?" news, Liverpool have banned the Sun from Anfield.
|
#
¿
Feb 10, 2017 18:02
|
|
|
|
| # ¿ May 7, 2024 15:26 |
|
|
Brony Car posted:At some point, club owners will do whatever they need to do once the fans stop paying. How long would it take before Arsenal fans stop showing up? Legit can't tell if this is meant to be satire or not. Most Liverpool fans are very aware of the impact Hicks and Gillett had on the club. Many regular match goers went to the protests in Liverpool (myself included as a wee lad) so are intimately acquainted with problem owners. FSG are absolutely nowhere near as bad. The ticket fiasco was pretty lovely but FSG withdrew it after the fan's pressure. The Anfield Road end expansion is still in the works, but there are definitely issues around it (they can't afford to build it without raising ticket prices because we'll be knocking out an end of the stadium for a good few months) and talks are continuing. Form comes and goes throughout the season. There are a (very) small minority of fans who want FSG out, or perhaps just loosen the purse strings a little. There's no evidence that FSG aren't willing to pay for players Klopp wants - some comments in January Klopp made about how teams don't want to let their best players go has been misinterpreted to mean we aren't willing to spend enough. It's not organised and it's not widespread, so I don't see it being an issue. Not sure how it's related to your point either. The fans still turned up to Anfield during Hicks and Gillet's tenure, even if it was to shout abuse.
|
|
#
¿
Feb 20, 2017 19:37
|
|
|
FullLeatherJacket posted:christ i'm old I say wee lad. I was in my teens. gently caress that was ten years ago.
|
|
#
¿
Feb 20, 2017 23:37
|
|
|
For fucks sake couldn't they wait until after our game
|
|
#
¿
Feb 23, 2017 20:58
|
|
|
http://www.lcfc.com/news/article/2016-17/club-statement-leicester-city-and-claudio-ranieri-part-company-3591441.aspx
|
|
#
¿
Feb 23, 2017 21:01
|
|
|
HJB posted:gently caress Ranieri, the oval office's making out he's some sort of martyr. It's getting a bit ridiculous. He's not loving dead he was leading the champions of England to relegation of course he got sacked. There was a better way about this and personally I thought he should have walked before Christmas with his head held high (and taken the England job) but this is all getting stupid.
|
|
#
¿
Feb 25, 2017 14:01
|
|
|
|
| # ¿ May 7, 2024 15:26 |
|
|
Blue Star Error posted:Alternatively he lead a relegation bound team to the title Well yes he did and like I said I don't think he deserved to be let go in this manner... but do you really think the goal pre-season was to try and avoid relegation? He completely failed to build on anything he achieved last season, and he's arguably left the club in a worse position than they were when he arrived (how many of Leicester's big player are going to stay if they go down? How much money have they drained out of the club?). Someone on the BBC has pointed out the same thing happened to Mourinho last season and absolutely nobody batted an eyelid because they don't like Mou. Ranieri is seen as some sort of darling of the Premier League and so everyone appears to be overlooking how terrible a job he's done this season.
|
|
#
¿
Feb 25, 2017 14:37
|
|