Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
 
  • Locked thread
lua
Jun 16, 2013

Bogan King posted:

^ i thought we already had analogue laws that would cover this sort of stuff.


gay picnic defence posted:

wouldn't be the first time we tried to ban something with unintended consequences

It's real hard to make laws about this stuff because 'drugs' is not a meaningful scientific category, only a social one. Analogue laws don't work because manufacturers come up with new, unrelated drugs in response to bans (ironically meaning legal highs are getting more dangerous). Effects-based laws work if you ignore the million obvious holes, e.g. perfume, flowers, petrol.

New Zealand gave up trying to legislate against new drugs for a while and made them legal, but there was a backlash and they neutered the law: http://volteface.me/features/what-ever-happened-to-new-zealands-much-hailed-drug-regulation/

lua fucked around with this message at 11:31 on Mar 8, 2017

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

  • Locked thread