Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
 
  • Locked thread
Corky Romanovsky
Oct 1, 2006

Soiled Meat
Ah, Russia went back in time and hacked the constitutional convention. Somehow the change didn't register in the minds of the Clinton campaign. I'm super mad and frustrated now.

yeah, I'm not John Q Public

E: Maybe you are playing a role in promoting the idea of U.S.democracy destabilization.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Main Paineframe
Oct 27, 2010

Alienwarehouse posted:

the supposed anti-war party—

Alienwarehouse posted:

the Democrats—

????? is this some kind of joke

Terror Sweat
Mar 15, 2009

people are more upset about russians doing some nebulous hacking and stealing this election than they were when george bush literally stole the election in 2000

Alienwarehouse
Apr 1, 2017

Main Paineframe posted:

????? is this some kind of joke

I said "supposed." That was the image they had, at least compared to republicans.

Bip Roberts
Mar 29, 2005

Terror Sweat posted:

people are more upset about russians doing some nebulous hacking and stealing this election than they were when george bush literally stole the election in 2000

People were pretty dang angry about that too but also didn't have any clear path forward though the courts.

Gringostar
Nov 12, 2016
Morbid Hound
:qq: russia is a distraction guys, it's red bating, trump did nothing wrong :qq:

https://twitter.com/biannagolodryga/status/848328774131339264

:laffo:

Terror Sweat
Mar 15, 2009

Gringostar posted:

:qq: russia is a distraction guys, it's red bating, trump did nothing wrong :qq:

https://twitter.com/biannagolodryga/status/848328774131339264

:laffo:

russia IS a distraction, and no leftist in the world is going to say trump did nothing wrong

sexpot
Nov 12, 2016

by LITERALLY AN ADMIN

Terror Sweat posted:

russia IS a distraction

'Kay. From...what?

Alienwarehouse
Apr 1, 2017

sexpot posted:

'Kay. From...what?

From things that poor people care about, such as healthcare, social security, unions, and SNAP.

But yeah, Putin hacked my Obamacare account.

sexpot
Nov 12, 2016

by LITERALLY AN ADMIN

Alienwarehouse posted:

From things that poor people care about, such as healthcare, social security, unions, and SNAP.

LOL I don't believe so

Baku
Aug 20, 2005

by Fluffdaddy
i've asked this in cspam before but what reality do you gusy live in where russia is the only story right now, rather than trump being bombarded 24/7 by negative news criticizing his approach to the budget, immigration, healthcare, diplomacy, etc

even my dumbest dem friends who constantly lament the defeat of dear abuelita constantly talk about a lot of poo poo trump and the us govt are bad at besides the existence of a russian connection

sexpot
Nov 12, 2016

by LITERALLY AN ADMIN

wizard on a water slide posted:

i've asked this in cspam before but what reality do you gusy live in where russia is the only story right now

What

Gringostar
Nov 12, 2016
Morbid Hound

Alienwarehouse posted:

From things that poor people care about, such as healthcare, social security, unions, and SNAP.

But yeah, Putin hacked my Obamacare account.

:lol: if you think poor people care about that poo poo

they give a poo poo about someone telling them it's going to be alright even if that person lies through their teeth

Bip Roberts
Mar 29, 2005

Alienwarehouse posted:

From things that poor people care about, such as healthcare, social security, unions, and SNAP.

But yeah, Putin hacked my Obamacare account.

hmm so maybe we should do nothing to hurt trumps ability to destroy all those

Terror Sweat
Mar 15, 2009

Bip Roberts posted:

hmm so maybe we should do nothing to hurt trumps ability to destroy all those

even if the top 5 people in the chain of succession were sent to jail for treason they would still be destroyed by the conservatives at the top. trump is the symptom, not the cause

Bip Roberts
Mar 29, 2005

Terror Sweat posted:

even if the top 5 people in the chain of succession were sent to jail for treason they would still be destroyed by the conservatives at the top. trump is the symptom, not the cause

Yeah but wrecking the republican party with a giant scandal doesn't hurt.

unlimited shrimp
Aug 30, 2008

wizard on a water slide posted:

even my dumbest dem friends who constantly lament the defeat of dear abuelita constantly talk about a lot of poo poo trump and the us govt are bad at besides the existence of a russian connection
thats cool what are they saying about hillary and the dem establishment specifically + do they say it in a howard beale-y tone or is it more like an absentminded mutter while they flip through a small stack of New Yorkers deciding which to throw away and which to coyly display on the coffee table

Gringostar
Nov 12, 2016
Morbid Hound

Bip Roberts posted:

Yeah but wrecking the republican party with a giant scandal doesn't hurt.

why it's almost like the main point of this is to depress republican voter turnout

Corky Romanovsky
Oct 1, 2006

Soiled Meat

Bip Roberts posted:

hmm so maybe we should do nothing to hurt trumps ability to destroy all those

Stop thinking on the defensive, dumbasses.

Bip Roberts
Mar 29, 2005

Corky Romanovsky posted:

Stop thinking on the defensive, dumbasses.

how is this defensive?

Corky Romanovsky
Oct 1, 2006

Soiled Meat
It is merely defending existing legislation.

Bip Roberts
Mar 29, 2005

Corky Romanovsky posted:

It is merely defending existing legislation.

Is this something that shouldn't be done?

Corky Romanovsky
Oct 1, 2006

Soiled Meat
Simply defending current legislation does nothing to advance the nation.

Bip Roberts
Mar 29, 2005
Hmm so the powerful shouldn't be held accountable to the law. Got it.

Main Paineframe
Oct 27, 2010

Corky Romanovsky posted:

It is merely defending existing legislation.

as it turns out it's pretty hard to pass things when you're the minority in every branch of government

Corky Romanovsky
Oct 1, 2006

Soiled Meat
Who said anything about pass?

E: oh, yeah, capitulate on anything but certain victory. Sounds like business as usual at the DNC

Corky Romanovsky has issued a correction as of 14:55 on Apr 2, 2017

Main Paineframe
Oct 27, 2010

Corky Romanovsky posted:

Who said anything about pass?

E: oh, yeah, capitulate on anything but certain victory. Sounds like business as usual at the DNC

It's pretty hard to "advance the nation" without actually accomplishing things

Corky Romanovsky
Oct 1, 2006

Soiled Meat
If only there was a poll or referendum on "inspired vision" vs "preserving the status quo"...

ate shit on live tv
Feb 15, 2004

by Azathoth

Main Paineframe posted:

as it turns out it's pretty hard to pass things when you're the minority in every branch of government

It's also impossible to pass good laws even when you have the majority especially if you are a democrat.

comedyblissoption
Mar 15, 2006

wizard on a water slide posted:

i've asked this in cspam before but what reality do you gusy live in where russia is the only story right now, rather than trump being bombarded 24/7 by negative news criticizing his approach to the budget, immigration, healthcare, diplomacy, etc

even my dumbest dem friends who constantly lament the defeat of dear abuelita constantly talk about a lot of poo poo trump and the us govt are bad at besides the existence of a russian connection
the head of the dnc keeps pushing this angle hard whenever he gets on air
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FtcPzet9Fnc

every time i turn on npr it's russia this or russia that

comedyblissoption
Mar 15, 2006

also in case it wasn't immediately obvious from the video, the head of the dnc, tom perez, tries to deflect a question about superdelegates and the issues with the dnc primaries by talking about russia

he's literally using the russia angle to try to get away from criticism of the democratic party

comedyblissoption
Mar 15, 2006

also for context in case you dont understand how absurd the democratic party superdelegate system is and why criticism of it is warranted and entirely legitimate and why the literal head of the dnc not wanting to answer questions about it is so loving stupid:
https://www.bustle.com/articles/141611-does-the-gop-have-superdelegates-the-republican-partys-nomination-rules-are-different-this-year

quote:

The technical answer is that yes, the Republican Party does have superdelegates. However, they function differently for the GOP than Democrats, and in 2016, Republican superdelegates will have way, way less power and autonomy than the superdelegates on the Democratic side.

The thing to keep in mind about delegates and superdelegates is that they were created not by Congress or the Constitution, but the parties themselves. The GOP and the Democratic Party are non-governmental organizations, and so they can basically set whatever rules they'd like regarding delegates and how they're distributed.

In the Democratic Party, you're a superdelegate if you're a member of the official party apparatus. That includes all current Democratic governors and members of Congress as well as former presidents, former vice presidents, state party chairs, and that sort of thing. In the Democratic Party, superdelegates can vote for whichever candidate they wish regardless of how the state that they come from votes, and in total, superdelegates comprise about 15 percent of the total delegates that determine the nomination.

The GOP, however, has decided to establish fewer superdelegates than the Democrats. In the Republican Party, the only people who get superdelegate status are the three members of each state's national party. This means that in the GOP, superdelegates are only about 7 percent of the total number of delegates.

The more important distinction, though, is that Republican superdelegates do not have the freedom to vote for whichever candidate they please. The Republican National Committee ruled in 2015 that their superdelegates must vote for the candidate that their state voted for, and that's the biggest difference between Republican and Democratic superdelegates.

In general, superdelegates are a way for the party elite to exert additional influence over the nomination process. If voters were on the verge of nominating a candidate who the party felt didn't have a good shot at winning the general election, the superdelegates might step in and tip the scales.

That could conceivably happen this year on the Democratic side. However, it's simply not possible for Republican superdelegates to override the wishes of Republican voters. Thanks to the rules the national GOP has established, Republican "superdelegates" aren't very "super" at all.

Modest Mao
Feb 11, 2011

by Cyrano4747
its bad and dumb but they're a private political club not a gov. institution

(lol)

Modest Mao
Feb 11, 2011

by Cyrano4747
I want so badly to outlaw private political clubs from sharing funds or colluding it owuld really gently caress america up if individuals ran on their own merits not a (D) or (R)

rudatron
May 31, 2011

by Fluffdaddy
Most intelligent voting systems have the idea of a party baked into it from the start, which is better than simply expecting autonomous politicians all day erryday, like the founding fathers thought you'd get.

Corky Romanovsky
Oct 1, 2006

Soiled Meat
Maybe have membership determined by a computer, based on individual voting record. Oops, 95% get put in the Dirtbag Party.

Nix Panicus
Feb 25, 2007

rudatron posted:

Most intelligent voting systems have the idea of a party baked into it from the start, which is better than simply expecting autonomous politicians all day erryday, like the founding fathers thought you'd get.

The Founding Father were really kind of dumb in many ways.

That or malicious conniving bastards who wanted everyone else to *think* they weren't going to form a political party so they could unleash their political party and take the others by surprise.

the bitcoin of weed
Nov 1, 2014

Not a Step posted:

The Founding Father were really kind of dumb in many ways.

That or malicious conniving bastards who wanted everyone else to *think* they weren't going to form a political party so they could unleash their political party and take the others by surprise.

or smug power-hungry aristocrats who thought commoners are too stupid to self govern and thought they were any better than the other smug power-hungry aristocrats they fashioned themselves after in the old world
"dumb and incompetent in a condescending way" is the history of western politics basically

Main Paineframe
Oct 27, 2010

comedyblissoption posted:

also in case it wasn't immediately obvious from the video, the head of the dnc, tom perez, tries to deflect a question about superdelegates and the issues with the dnc primaries by talking about russia

he's literally using the russia angle to try to get away from criticism of the democratic party

superdelegates didn't steal the election

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Darkman Fanpage
Jul 4, 2012

Main Paineframe posted:

superdelegates didn't steal the election

neithet did the russians.

  • Locked thread