|
I'd link the studies, but you're doing a pretty good job of playing the stereotypical shithead misogynist rear end in a top hat who is the exact reason there's a wage gap, and it's kinda educational. Please continue. Asking other people to do the labour of proving that marginalised people are marginalised is a big part of that stereotype.
|
#
¿
Mar 27, 2017 06:41
|
|
|
|
| # ¿ May 16, 2024 06:27 |
|
|
SpaceClown posted:Linking studies isn't labor and I haven't asked anybody to prove the wage gap exists or that women are maginalized and it's pretty clear that there's a poo poo ton of classic DnD projection that I'm some kind of concern troll going on ITT despite spending the OP clearly saying "Gimme some studies so I don't look like an idiot who just says "lol u r misogeenist"" because that does loving absolutely nothing outside of this garbage subforum. It's not really the concern trolling, and yes, asking people to do internet research for you is labour. Regardless, the way you asked for it was lovely and misogynistic, and you've posted a ton of lovely and misogynistic things in this thread so far (which other posters have done a pretty good job of calling you on). Here's some data anyway: https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2016/03/a-visual-history-of-gender-and-employment Also the reason women get less "aggressive" about negotiating for wages and against other bullshit is that the people holding the purse strings over them are predominantly male, and very often don't treat them equally. A man can get away with being aggressive where a woman cannot, and a wage system that favours aggression is going to perpetuate that bias.
|
|
#
¿
Mar 27, 2017 07:01
|
|
|
Hell, here's a great example of how systemic bias plays out in the workplace: http://www.vox.com/first-person/2017/3/17/14950296/sexism-name-switch-tweets Women don't earn less because of a lack of aggressiveness. They earn less because men are misogynists more often than not, mostly without even realising it.
|
|
#
¿
Mar 27, 2017 07:05
|
|