|
Dr. Snark posted:Now this looks like it's going to be a fun ride. All things considered I'm erring towards Klaus and Petersen because Gripens never get enough love and they're the only company willing to sell us a proper AWACS plane. I like this choice and support it.
|
#
¿
Mar 29, 2017 19:01
|
|
|
|
| # ¿ Apr 29, 2024 23:21 |
|
|
Do we have to choose one of the infantry packages or can we pick multiple? Getting both the Americans and the Serbians may give us some flexibility, and it's not like they're much more expensive compared to the plane investments. Also, in what way did the Americans flunk out of Basic?
|
|
#
¿
Apr 6, 2017 09:22
|
|
|
What would be the nearest airport outside of Lhasa where the Chinese could base any planes out of?
|
|
#
¿
Apr 10, 2017 20:00
|
|
|
Would it be possible to kill the base at Lhasa and then (preemtively?) capture whichever airstrip could be an alternate return point for the Chinese? Since Lahsa would be unavailabe, every chinese plane in the current theatre based from there would need to reassess their bingo status and such, especially the ones sent to respond to the indian raid. ^Same idea.
|
|
#
¿
Apr 11, 2017 13:14
|
|
|
gradenko_2000 posted:I love that the follow-up to "trying to take over an airbase in the middle of Lhasa would be way too risky" is "perhaps should completely flatten THAT base, and THEN take over the ALTERNATE airbase!" You must admit, nobody would ever expect that. Quinntan posted:Surely the alternates would be Yonphula (god help us) and Bagdogra, where the Indians are making their attack from.
|
|
#
¿
Apr 11, 2017 13:36
|
|
|
Quinntan posted:Something to bear in mind, Angola is currently China's second biggest African trade partner. If we work for O Presidente, we will get sold out, it'd just be a matter of time. And by working against him, it's only a question of time until they send some "volunteers" to help Presidente "restore order". That said, Angola - Count
|
|
#
¿
Apr 18, 2017 13:28
|
|
|
Yooper posted:
I guess it wants to become a Cruiser when it grows up? One of those would actually be useful in this area. Everyone has a coast. Nuramor fucked around with this message at 13:10 on Apr 19, 2017 |
|
#
¿
Apr 19, 2017 13:06
|
|
|
"Other four factions"? Who else is there again?
|
|
#
¿
Apr 22, 2017 18:05
|
|
|
Why #bankrupt?
|
|
#
¿
May 8, 2017 15:40
|
|
|
How about turning that around? A large number of hardened targets you need modern munitions for with 30-40 Mig-21s flying CAP? No rearm.
|
|
#
¿
May 24, 2017 15:02
|
|
|
Eastern EuropePenguinSalsa posted:
Good call. Let's keep that in mind, once we pick our faction. Nuramor fucked around with this message at 19:39 on May 25, 2017 |
|
#
¿
May 25, 2017 09:13
|
|
|
Subhunting
|
|
#
¿
Jun 8, 2017 08:29
|
|
|
But you know what would work on nonfortified ground? Cluster munitions.
|
|
#
¿
Aug 3, 2017 10:29
|
|
|
glynnenstein posted:Is there no "drunk" setting? drat. Thats "manual control".
|
|
#
¿
Oct 8, 2017 16:30
|
|
|
Would be funny if we got like, one single Gen 5 fighter. Just the one. We'd have to do a Thunderdome before every mission for it.
|
|
#
¿
Oct 12, 2017 15:30
|
|
|
Gripens + Invisibote
|
|
#
¿
Oct 18, 2017 12:25
|
|
|
Lets hope Aiko isn't cross with us about that Mitsuhashi thing.
|
|
#
¿
Oct 30, 2017 09:40
|
|
|
Groggy nard posted:Just remember that the more merc airfields we bomb, the more likely said bombed mercs will want to perform a reprisal strike against us at a later date. With what planes?
|
|
#
¿
Nov 11, 2017 14:03
|
|
|
|
| # ¿ Apr 29, 2024 23:21 |
|
|
Enemy expenditures: 1199 rounds of 130mm artillery Thats...a lot.
|
|
#
¿
Nov 26, 2017 23:34
|
|