|
Isn't it only a problem if you're in a country with an excessive growth rate? I was under the impression most first world countries hover around ~2 children per couple. edit: Actually, from looking it up it seems like it's usually below 2.
|
#
¿
Mar 29, 2017 22:41
|
|
|
|
| # ¿ Apr 30, 2024 00:36 |
|
|
boner confessor posted:from a population growth standpoint but there are other valid reasons for antinatalism, such as each new person being an environmental burden on the world, the high personal cost of child rearing, and the sheer philosophical brutality of creating a human with no choice to be born and endure an imperfect world full of suffering Yeah that is true; I guess a child born in a developed nation inherently creates a bigger environmental burden than one born in a poorer nation. Though it's hard to say if a drastic drop in population growth might lead to more overall suffering due to causing the worldwide economy to collapse.
|
|
#
¿
Mar 29, 2017 22:44
|
|