|
https://twitter.com/JulianAssange/status/861764728753926144
|
#
¿
May 11, 2017 21:05
|
|
|
|
| # ¿ May 3, 2024 06:46 |
|
|
This guy seems to think everyone on the left is antifa. Which Trump supporters also do, coincidentally.
|
|
#
¿
May 12, 2017 02:34
|
|
|
 http://time.com/4797521/russia-orthodox-gay-marriage-nazi-germany/
|
|
#
¿
May 31, 2017 03:40
|
|
|
Jose posted:dershowitz supporting the party full of nonces eh? big surprise
|
|
#
¿
Jun 4, 2017 18:18
|
|
|
hakimashou posted:To be fair they put their lives on the line to fight trying to save their people from communism, that's legit heroic, identical to dying fighting the nazis. Can't tell if serious.
|
|
#
¿
Jun 21, 2017 20:18
|
|
|
Plutonis posted:My hot take: last year, starting with Bernie, a group of young white heterosexual malcontents decided that a party focused on women and minorities should change itself to accommodate them. (Whom do you think "economic issues" benefit most?) They've been taught from birth that they should control everything and everything should be about them, so why not the Democratic Party? The diehard Hillary people genuinely believe this.
|
|
#
¿
Jun 21, 2017 20:20
|
|
|
Plutonis posted:it's from the GAF The what?
|
|
#
¿
Jun 21, 2017 20:25
|
|
|
Lol
|
|
#
¿
Jun 24, 2017 19:37
|
|
|
Since no one has pointed it out, we wouldn't in fact need to go broke for everyone with cancer in the US to receive treatment.
|
|
#
¿
Jun 28, 2017 07:23
|
|
|
hakimashou posted:There's an amazing lack of self-reflection when someone complains that the presence of Jews makes them feel 'unsafe' but doesnt get far enough to think that maybe Jews feel even more unsafe when they are singled out and excluded for being Jews because its something that's happened to their people before pretty recently. Wasn't it an accident and they thought she was a Zionist?
|
|
#
¿
Jul 6, 2017 01:03
|
|
|
hakimashou posted:What is a zionist except a Jew who wants to be safe for a change? Jesus Christ get away from me
|
|
#
¿
Jul 6, 2017 01:43
|
|
|
I agree with the guy that slavery would have ended on its own but I might be biased since I don't think the US should ever have attacked the Confederacy in the first place.
|
|
#
¿
Jul 22, 2017 09:31
|
|
|
It would be cool if people knelt like they were being knighted when they gave blowjobs though.
|
|
#
¿
Jul 23, 2017 08:51
|
|
|
Autism Sneaks posted:that's like the opposite of a hot take I think a take that's so cold it burns can qualify. That's Hakimashou's takes, after all.
|
|
#
¿
Jul 23, 2017 08:55
|
|
|
Is Mastio implying that tax evasion is brave?
|
|
#
¿
Jul 29, 2017 17:13
|
|
|
Pener Kropoopkin posted:Is the answer no? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Betteridge%27s_law_of_headlines
|
|
#
¿
Aug 13, 2017 09:11
|
|
|
Minty posted:this one is correct though? Science is a process for building models that reflect our perceptions of reality. It isn't capital-T Truth The results of science doesn't need to reflect our preexisting perceptions of reality, that's the whole point. Science is a process to seek truth, and out of all such processes it's the most likely to give us literal truths.
|
|
#
¿
Aug 13, 2017 20:28
|
|
|
Modest Mao posted:nah Current models being overturned to be more accurate doesn't contradict what I said, it supports it.
|
|
#
¿
Aug 13, 2017 21:36
|
|
|
Hodgepodge posted:this process is predicated on understanding that science does not create knowledge, but is rather a method by which we test assumptions for errors Exactly. I didn't say that preexisting perceptions had to be unscientifically created. Nor did I mean to imply that the results of the scientific process are to be set in stone as the one truth forever. Hypotheses are by definition falsifiable, and experiments repeatable, for a reason. Also since we're getting philosophical here, I should specify that when I said "literal truth" I mean practical truth as opposed to absolute truth, i.e. it's useful to us as humans but we can't be 100% certain of it in a philosophical sense.
|
|
#
¿
Aug 13, 2017 22:02
|
|
|
Minty posted:Science literally can not seek "Truth", as you already pointed out yourself. It merely creates models, which must be able to make predictions. If those models do not make predictions that align with our actual observations, then we (hopefully) form new models that do. Those observations, whether direct or indirect, are absolutely governed by our current perceptions. And those models, no matter how accurate or precise, are not reality. C'est n'est pas une pipe and all. I guess you and I were using the word "perception" differently. But for practical purposes, if a model can be explained by a process, and that process is something that exists in physical reality (which we have know way to really know yadda yadda yadda) then science has found a truth at least in the colloquial sense. And of all our methods of inquiry it's the best at doing that. That's all I'm saying. I think a few folks (or maybe just Modest Mao) have a chip on their shoulder and want to assume because I defended science I'm a positivist, or I think science is God, or at the very least I loving Love It, but no. I just think it's useful.
|
|
#
¿
Aug 14, 2017 04:08
|
|
|
Minty posted:I'm just going to say you are confusing symbols with what they represent, and should probably read more on epistemology, especially in regards to representationalism and realism I understand that c'est n'est pas une pipe. But colloquially an accurate representation can be "truth." I don't think you and I even disagree, there's just definition confusion. Minty posted:eta: no one is "attacking" science here; I've been trained as a physicist myself. I don't get where you think you are "defending" it Chill. I misunderstood what you meant by "perceptions" and wanted to clear up what I thought you mean by the relationship between science and truth. I'm not trying to paint you as anti-science.
|
|
#
¿
Aug 14, 2017 04:46
|
|
|
|
|
#
¿
Aug 28, 2017 07:16
|
|
|
This is genuinely one of the stupidest things I've ever read.
|
|
#
¿
Sep 15, 2017 20:41
|
|
|
|
|
#
¿
Sep 18, 2017 05:49
|
|
|
the bitcoin of weed posted:this dude is full of these How can someone look at incarceration rates and think black people have immunity from conviction?
|
|
#
¿
Sep 20, 2017 18:05
|
|
|
Every tweet that guy makes should be accompanied by galaxy brain
|
|
#
¿
Sep 20, 2017 18:13
|
|
|
It's hosed up that Jeb Lund used photoshop to a racist caricature of this guy.
|
|
#
¿
Sep 20, 2017 18:30
|
|
|
Mermaid Autopsy posted:It was a pretty good way of framing it so NFL fans would understand until you got to the "I don't know what they're really protesting" part On the other hand, "I don't know what they're really protesting" was extreme honesty from him.
|
|
#
¿
Oct 4, 2017 09:10
|
|
|
Very hot.
|
|
#
¿
Oct 4, 2017 09:13
|
|
|
A mere 5 rapes
|
|
#
¿
Oct 20, 2017 08:24
|
|
|
General Dog posted:Roe v Wade is why college basketball is so lovely now WHat
|
|
#
¿
Oct 20, 2017 21:24
|
|
|
Jose posted:pretty sure people would I can't even make it to the pearl clutching over the Stalin movie because of the stuff before it about how good it is to hit children
|
|
#
¿
Oct 24, 2017 07:59
|
|
|
|
|
#
¿
Oct 26, 2017 07:32
|
|
|
|
|
#
¿
Oct 27, 2017 03:58
|
|
|
Algund Eenboom posted:i found the axis mundi of hot takes https://fee.org/articles/ I've never in my life seen such pure neoliberalism
|
|
#
¿
Nov 16, 2017 06:03
|
|
|
Lot going on here
|
|
#
¿
Dec 23, 2017 08:07
|
|
|
I've heard a lot of people, especially older people, use "communist" to mean "Stalinist" and "socialist" to mean "social democrat," though. Including one Bernie Sanders.
|
|
#
¿
Dec 24, 2017 02:38
|
|
|
Holy poo poo Cornel West's tooth gap is real, I thought he just put a raisin there for effect
|
|
#
¿
Dec 26, 2017 17:46
|
|
|
He's referring to the rise of "illiberal democracy" but you basically can't have liberalism without democracy
|
|
#
¿
Dec 31, 2017 07:18
|
|
|
|
| # ¿ May 3, 2024 06:46 |
|
|
Pener Kropoopkin posted:that’s not technically true Depends on your definition of liberalism because some include democracy
|
|
#
¿
Dec 31, 2017 07:32
|
|