|
"Report: Girl in Weiner sexting case lied to damage Clinton" That's right folks, looks like it's time for another vast right-wing conspiracy The Hill is reporting that the underage girl groomed and sexted by Anthony Weiner is *not* the victim your bleeding heart might have believed. Instead, this loose trollop was a honeypot planted to lure Anthony Weiner into a trap that would undo the presidential ambitions of our once and future queen, Hillary Rodham Clinton. The Hill claims that, according to nonprofit investigators Who What Why, the girl that the 52-year old man was graphically sexting was not 15, contrary to what was reported, what was claimed in court documents, and what he claimed in his own plea deal. No, they claim the girl was actually 16. Which clears everything up, and totally absolves him of the federal crime he just plead guilty to, right? Oh wait, no it doesn't. The proof of this is allegedly her learners permit, but you're not allowed to see this evidence. In fact, you're not allowed to see any of the evidence for anything claimed! Anyway, this "lie" was "clearly designed to produce the maximum public outrage and put Weiner in greater legal jeopardy." All designed with the intent of creating maximum problems for Hillary right before her election, in an attempt to "sand bag her" with the exploitation of a minor. If that wasn't bad enough, the girl asked for it, by initiating everything, they claim. Furthermore, this girl and her family aren't even good people. Her parents were..... Republicans. After the teenage girl was sexted by a 52 year old Democrat with close ties to the Democratic presidential candidate, "the victim celebrated Trump's victory on social media." Additionally, "her father is a registered Republican" and has a criminal record, and “her mother tweeted derisively about the Black Lives Matter movement.” Hopefully we can all come together to apologize to the unfairly maligned victims here, Anthony Weiner and more importantly, Hillary Clinton 
|
#
¿
May 23, 2017 14:44
|
|
|
|
| # ¿ May 4, 2024 08:23 |
|
|
Main Paineframe posted:hmm, I've never heard of Who What Why. better Google a bit to find out what they're abou- oh my god I had no idea it was Russ Baker hahaha Wikipedia posted:In March 2010, he appeared before the "Treason in America Conference," a gathering of Sept. 11 truthers. Baker said the 9/11 commission had “no credibility,” and "sounded open to the possibility that 9/11 was an inside job."[4] In 2014 he addressed a conference of the Assassination Archives and Research Center on the "role of the Warren Commission on the cover-up."[24] He has appeared frequently on Coast to Coast AM,[25] a radio show hosted by George Noory that deals with the paranormal and conspiracy theories. COAST TO COAST AM
|
|
#
¿
May 23, 2017 17:37
|
|
|
The push now was to pretend it never happened, which is why I was surprise by the brazenness of the smear against the victim. I mean, this was pretty brazen too in its demands that you stop caring: "Can we now stop talking about Anthony Weiner? Like, forever?" "it makes us look bad. stop talking about this."
|
|
#
¿
May 23, 2017 20:52
|
|
|
Main Paineframe posted:the original WhoWhatNow article spends like four paragraphs ranting about age of consent laws and how much of an effect the exact age of the underage girl will have on the judge and jury He only THOUGHT he was graphically describing the sexual acts he wished to perform to a 15 year old girl. It's like how the guys on To Catch a Predator only THOUGHT they were driving to the home of an unaccompanied minor. Who can truly say if they've committed a crime
|
|
#
¿
May 23, 2017 21:04
|
|
|
etalian posted:I lolled on how Hillary setup Weiner with Huma, from elections to matchmaking Dread Abuela is pretty horrible. 
|
|
#
¿
May 24, 2017 02:05
|
|