|
Meme Emulator posted:Can someone PLEASE tell me what the gently caress people are talking about when they talk about "ratio" Ratio of replies to likes/retweets
|
# ¿ May 25, 2017 02:02 |
|
|
# ¿ May 20, 2024 18:14 |
|
Mmm time to eat a big helping of lentils and check the Trump threa-
|
# ¿ May 26, 2017 03:09 |
|
Boon posted:Also, I just wanted to say that Ben Jacobs is a big piece of poo poo who is certainly playing up the role of victim. What the gently caress are you talking about
|
# ¿ May 26, 2017 03:12 |
|
Covok posted:Knew it: the Republican is going to win. Republicans will double down knowing they can body slam reporters and still win. Welcome to a preview of 2018. Toxx on it
|
# ¿ May 26, 2017 03:24 |
|
Holy poo poo when did the brokebrains invade
|
# ¿ May 26, 2017 04:10 |
|
Ein Sexmonster posted:They've always been here. I just meant they've all been popping out of the woodwork in the last few minutes or so
|
# ¿ May 26, 2017 04:12 |
|
TildeATH posted:Wait who are the broke brains now? The people who think losing is winning or the people who think losing is losing? if you have to ask
|
# ¿ May 26, 2017 04:19 |
|
BardoTheConsumer posted:Wait I just had a brainstorm. It's a retarded drunken idea but bear with me. And why don't they make the whole plane out of the black box, huh????
|
# ¿ May 26, 2017 04:25 |
|
BetterToRuleInHell posted:It isn't, and it's alarming that you think a bill should only be fully explained, no matter what the circumstances surrounding it, after advancing it. You're an idiot if that's what you think that sentence means
|
# ¿ Jun 21, 2017 03:40 |
|
Glazier posted:I'm too much of a wuss to do either, I'll just go through the motions until I'm executed in the street. how do people keep falling for you
|
# ¿ Jun 21, 2017 03:43 |
|
pacmania90 posted:It's interesting that so many people here have changed their opinion the morality of the death penalty, or this thread would be full of hypocrites. I'm anti-death penalty but I hope John McCain's brain explodes
|
# ¿ Jul 25, 2017 20:54 |
|
Go away
|
# ¿ Jul 26, 2017 01:22 |
|
Flip Yr Wig posted:IDGI The symbol means the ad is from Google AdSense, which tailors ads based on your browsing habits.
|
# ¿ Jul 26, 2017 17:33 |
|
lol conservatives are losing their minds over this
|
# ¿ Jul 28, 2017 16:37 |
|
Blitz7x posted:NRA will be thrilled that gun ownership is about to spike not when the people buying guns aren't white
|
# ¿ Aug 16, 2017 01:03 |
|
I'm mostly just shocked Donald Trump even knew that Washington and Jefferson owned slaves
|
# ¿ Aug 16, 2017 01:16 |
|
My dad was in Vegas at the time and loves music festivals so I was pretty worried for a hot minute. Man, gently caress this.
|
# ¿ Oct 2, 2017 14:33 |
|
Rigel posted:lol, he said this TODAY ahahaa holy poo poo I'm laughing to hide the pain from realizing he still has a decent chance of getting elected
|
# ¿ Nov 9, 2017 21:28 |
|
Glazier posted:Except for 2nd Amendment rights of course. lol they'd love to strip those away
|
# ¿ Nov 9, 2017 21:39 |
|
Rigel posted:touting his time as a prosecutor locking up the KKK. I thought we wanted him to win
|
# ¿ Nov 9, 2017 21:50 |
|
empty whippet box posted:I'd love to see a breakdown of conservative 'boycotts' and their actual effect, I wouldn't be surprised if most of them actually helped the companies they targeted. All I can think of is all the times they tried to protest Starbucks by buying Starbucks.
|
# ¿ Nov 12, 2017 18:14 |
|
Starshark posted:You guys dumping on the person who didn't want to vote for Hillary are the reason Trump's going to be a two-termer. gently caress yeah, let's hash this out again
|
# ¿ Nov 29, 2017 22:22 |
|
Kilroy posted:What if - bear with me here - what if we approached elections as a thing we tried to win rather than something to be run in such a way that our primary motivator for turning out the vote is shame? What if we regarded winning as fundamentally more important than plausible deniability when we lose? No one wants to argue this with you
|
# ¿ Nov 29, 2017 22:35 |
|
NothingMatters posted:Any of them because no one believed a single word that two-faced shuckster said. I didn't realize ThisIsWhyTrumpWon reregged
|
# ¿ Nov 29, 2017 22:41 |
|
Kilroy posted:I don't go around informing people who don't agree with me that they're actually Republicans. Who said this, legit curious, because I've been following this dumbass argument back the last several pages and no one brought it up
|
# ¿ Nov 29, 2017 22:43 |
|
That's not the same thing lol
|
# ¿ Nov 29, 2017 22:44 |
|
Starshark posted:They don't think that you loving moron, they just didn't turn up to vote for Hillary. If you're too stupid to keep up with the discussion, please don't post - we're not missing anything. yes they did
|
# ¿ Nov 29, 2017 22:48 |
|
Starshark posted:http://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2017/05/12/black-voter-turnout-fell-in-2016-even-as-a-record-number-of-americans-cast-ballots/ You're telling me that fewer black people voted for the candidate who wasn't the first black president and more white people voted for the open white supremacist? Well, that just doesn't make sense!
|
# ¿ Nov 29, 2017 22:53 |
|
Starshark posted:The problem isn't that idiots voted for Trump, the problem is not enough people turned up for Hillary. If you're going to vote for Trump (and the biggest predictor of a Trump voter was racism and sexism), there's no amount of moving to the right that's going to change your mind if your a woman. Hillary needed to get out the vote, and she didn't. The problem is that you're blaming Hillary (who was not a great candidate by any means, true) for not replicating Obama's success among black people, which was loving impossible in the first place. The article you posted just reinforced how much you missed the point.
|
# ¿ Nov 29, 2017 22:58 |
|
hoooly poo poo
|
# ¿ Nov 29, 2017 23:00 |
|
I wasn't saying she didn't do well in black areas, by the way, because she absolutely did and you're still wrong about that. But expecting her to do as well as Obama is crazy.
|
# ¿ Nov 29, 2017 23:03 |
|
I dunno, maybe he'll reinforce how she needed to campaign harder in states like Pennsylvania
|
# ¿ Nov 29, 2017 23:04 |
|
Here's a question that's probably been asked a million times but that I haven't seen in my occasional perusals of this thread: Assuming Dems retake the Senate, how do they go about preventing another Trump from ever using the presidency to blatantly enrich themselves? Like, how do they enforce it, because the Emoluments Clause certainly ain't getting adhered to. e: assuming they even want to, that is
|
# ¿ Nov 30, 2017 01:27 |
|
Your Taint posted:So reducing women to a crude vagina is not ok, but reducing men to a crude penis is. Got it. Yes, exactly, good job
|
# ¿ Dec 12, 2017 00:44 |
|
No one worth caring about actually thinks of "dick" as a real slur
|
# ¿ Dec 12, 2017 00:53 |
|
Chadderbox posted:The new comment count froze at 1 for about 30 seconds even when there was nothing new. Seems to have cleared up. It happens now and again where a post will get "stuck" until it is freed by someone else posting. It's been a thing for a long time.
|
# ¿ Dec 13, 2017 00:50 |
|
It's at 2.9!!!!! I should just loving go to bed now and savor this brief taste of happiness!
|
# ¿ Dec 13, 2017 03:13 |
|
Jesus gently caress 4.8
|
# ¿ Dec 13, 2017 03:16 |
|
SACRIFICE ANOTHER VIRGIN FOR JONES PRAISE THE ALMIGHTY NEEDLE
|
# ¿ Dec 13, 2017 03:19 |
|
|
# ¿ May 20, 2024 18:14 |
|
8.2 good loving lord
|
# ¿ Dec 13, 2017 03:27 |