|
What is the best flav... you all know what this question is: This poll is closed. |
|||
|---|---|---|---|
| Labour |
|
907 | 49.92% |
| Theresa May Team (Conservative) |
|
48 | 2.64% |
| Liberal Democrats |
|
31 | 1.71% |
| UKIP |
|
13 | 0.72% |
| Plaid Cymru |
|
25 | 1.38% |
| Green |
|
22 | 1.21% |
| Scottish Socialist Party |
|
12 | 0.66% |
| Scottish Conservative Party |
|
1 | 0.06% |
| Scottish National Party |
|
59 | 3.25% |
| Some Kind of Irish Unionist |
|
4 | 0.22% |
| Alliance / Irish Nonsectarian |
|
3 | 0.17% |
| Some Kind of Irish Nationalist |
|
36 | 1.98% |
| Misc. Far Left Trots |
|
35 | 1.93% |
| Misc. Far Right Fash |
|
8 | 0.44% |
| Monster Raving Loony |
|
49 | 2.70% |
| Space Navies Party |
|
39 | 2.15% |
| Independent / Single Issue |
|
2 | 0.11% |
| Can't Vote |
|
188 | 10.35% |
| Won't Vote |
|
8 | 0.44% |
| Spoiled Ballot |
|
15 | 0.83% |
| Pissflaps |
|
312 | 17.17% |
| Total: | 1817 votes | ||
|
My personal crackpot theory is that there's no correlation between age and political preference, it's specifically the baby boomer generation that are broken in the head
|
#
¿
Jun 1, 2017 08:29
|
|
|
|
| # ¿ May 7, 2024 15:40 |
|
|
Pissflaps posted:Tea and coffee do hydrate you, you just can't typically drink them in sufficient quantities compared to water or other cold drinks. Typical unforced error from Corbyn and the Labour campaign. Come on!!
|
|
#
¿
Jun 1, 2017 20:46
|
|
|
Cameron led the donkey up the minaret, not many options for either party to get it down even if you don't mind making a mess.
|
|
#
¿
Jun 1, 2017 22:12
|
|
|
El Grillo posted:With the nuclear thing, isn't the obvious answer to literally just point out that if we got to that stage we'd all be dead anyway, so the only relevant thing to discuss is how not to get to that point... Nuclear/defence questions are largely about the prime minister being Big Daddy/Big Mummy rather than any actual concrete concerns based in, y'know, facts and whatnot
|
|
#
¿
Jun 2, 2017 23:04
|
|
|
Thanks Ants posted:Isn't the alternative to a "shoot to kill" policy a "let the firearms officer make their own decision" policy? Like people are getting bent out of shape because Corbyn favoured the person pulling the trigger to be able to make the decision. Or have I horribly misunderstood? No - like nukes, this is less about actual policy and more about Looking Tough On Bad Guys.
|
|
#
¿
Jun 4, 2017 20:09
|
|
|
MikeCrotch posted:The Imperial War Museum had a exhibition on modern state interrogation when I was there last, one of which was a piece where the reporter talked to someone under a control order about their life. You were provided a house for free, along with a huge list of all the things you were not allowed to do. Might be the only way I ever get secure housing. I'm in
|
|
#
¿
Jun 6, 2017 22:00
|
|
|
|
|
#
¿
Jun 8, 2017 22:37
|
|
|
It's a bit of a hedge but I went into this election thinking that Corbyn had already 'won' simply for playing a decent defence/May had 'lost' simply for her weak campaign showing. Now, though, I begin to hope.
|
|
#
¿
Jun 8, 2017 22:40
|
|
|
I have work in the morning but will stay up as long as possible. I also have too much food
|
|
#
¿
Jun 8, 2017 22:49
|
|
|
gently caress off Jack Straw
|
|
#
¿
Jun 8, 2017 23:23
|
|
|
I consent to Jeremy Corbyn.
|
|
#
¿
Jun 9, 2017 01:37
|
|
|
Too naughty to talk about.
|
|
#
¿
Jun 9, 2017 02:30
|
|
|
Lib Dems absolutely thrilled they've still got a seat in Parliament
|
|
#
¿
Jun 9, 2017 02:44
|
|
|
Nick Clegg approaching the execution block.
|
|
#
¿
Jun 9, 2017 02:45
|
|
|
I'm the slow zoom on Nick Clegg
|
|
#
¿
Jun 9, 2017 02:47
|
|
|
#libdemfightback
|
|
#
¿
Jun 9, 2017 02:48
|
|
|
Let's just hang on and watch Nick Clegg's abject misery
|
|
#
¿
Jun 9, 2017 02:50
|
|
|
Where do we rate this relative to Murphy or Balls
|
|
#
¿
Jun 9, 2017 02:52
|
|
|
a dinner egg for mr corbyn
|
|
#
¿
Jun 9, 2017 03:07
|
|
|
i'm the speaking clock lady
|
|
#
¿
Jun 9, 2017 03:08
|
|
|
Irony Be My Shield posted:Also turns out if you have policies that are good people will vote for you.
|
|
#
¿
Jun 9, 2017 03:48
|
|
|
3 hours sleep but I don't feel tired at all. What a day, what a lovely day!
|
|
#
¿
Jun 9, 2017 07:27
|
|
|
Same, it's called Labour
|
|
#
¿
Jun 9, 2017 22:41
|
|
|
Miftan posted:What if Liz asks May and then MAY CROSSES THE AISLE? Does Labour get to form a government? Haha, man, this lack of constitution stuff is great. UK politics is wild. "Chaos reigns"? It was in charge all along.
|
|
#
¿
Jun 9, 2017 23:05
|
|
|
Extreme0 posted:As much as I would love Buckethead to replace May's Seat. The only way he is getting in is through PR. Yes, Buckethead competing with May will just split the joke candidate vote.
|
|
#
¿
Jun 10, 2017 22:32
|
|
|
Legalistics aside, the Tories know they've got a body blow coming - just a question of when and where they take it that's least painful.
|
|
#
¿
Jun 11, 2017 10:05
|
|
|
It is a good move and hopefully this'll work out better than the last shadow unity cabinet because of it.
|
|
#
¿
Jun 11, 2017 12:36
|
|
|
big scary monsters posted:I agree but it's a surprisingly pervasive idea. A number of people I talk to think that if Labour get in, despite their consistent stance to the contrary, they're going to turn around with a secret plan and undo Article 50 and we can all go back to being a happy and satisfied part of the EU (lol). I can only assume that it's because they think Labour is good and reversing Brexit would be good, therefore it follows that Labour would reverse Brexit. I think the hope is to play out the Article 50 process, then refer the final deal to the public in referendum and hope that after 2 years the public has realised Brexit is a bad idea/the root causes for the Brexit vote like austerity will have been addressed enough for people to choose Remain. Ride the Chinese fingertrap tiger, etc.
|
|
#
¿
Jun 11, 2017 14:57
|
|
|
Prince John posted:I'd disagree with this actually, depending on the outcome of the investigation. If the cladding is legal, which the newspaper articles I've read suggest it is, then blame should be directed at those who made the building regs, not those who followed them. Surely there must be a "bloody obvious" clause to cover unspoken regulations like "don't cover your high-rise building in loving kindling"
|
|
#
¿
Jun 15, 2017 23:01
|
|
|
Angepain posted:does this guy think Extremely unlikely
|
|
#
¿
Jun 16, 2017 20:48
|
|
|
|
| # ¿ May 7, 2024 15:40 |
|
|
spectralent posted:Okay yeah but you realise you just keep describing why people are mad, right? "People are mad because the people who should be keeping them safe seem disinterested and unaccountable" is not answered by "actually they're structurally disinterested and unaccountable so that can't be helped". The learned helplessness of the proles is why we have to have a managerial class to make all the real decisions; the damage technocracy inflicts on us is the reason why it must exist in the first place.
|
|
#
¿
Jun 17, 2017 17:36
|
|