Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
What is the best flav... you all know what this question is:
This poll is closed.
Labour 907 49.92%
Theresa May Team (Conservative) 48 2.64%
Liberal Democrats 31 1.71%
UKIP 13 0.72%
Plaid Cymru 25 1.38%
Green 22 1.21%
Scottish Socialist Party 12 0.66%
Scottish Conservative Party 1 0.06%
Scottish National Party 59 3.25%
Some Kind of Irish Unionist 4 0.22%
Alliance / Irish Nonsectarian 3 0.17%
Some Kind of Irish Nationalist 36 1.98%
Misc. Far Left Trots 35 1.93%
Misc. Far Right Fash 8 0.44%
Monster Raving Loony 49 2.70%
Space Navies Party 39 2.15%
Independent / Single Issue 2 0.11%
Can't Vote 188 10.35%
Won't Vote 8 0.44%
Spoiled Ballot 15 0.83%
Pissflaps 312 17.17%
Total: 1817 votes
[Edit Poll (moderators only)]

 
  • Locked thread
Lord of the Llamas
Jul 9, 2002

EULER'VE TO SEE IT VENN SOMEONE CALLS IT THE WRONG THING AND PROVOKES MY WRATH

Fans posted:

Any situation in which Russia goes insane and starts nuking people invalidates MAD because if they've gone crazy why would they even care about MAD?

jabby posted:

In this scenario the aggressor nation is gambling that the UK's allies (or any other nuclear armed country) won't detect the launches and simply launch a massive retaliatory strike. That's a pretty huge gamble. If you're arguing for an aggressor that is completely willing to risk everything to bomb the UK why would Trident deter them, considering there's a decent chance the Prime Minister won't order a futile retaliation anyway?

I had almost this exact argument on Twitter with someone recently. (I know.. sigh)

But have you considered that ~someone~ might do it for ~some reason~ but might be put off by Trident ~because~? :smuggo:

Edit: The worst part was that he compared trident to seat belts because they're both "preventative measures".

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Lord of the Llamas
Jul 9, 2002

EULER'VE TO SEE IT VENN SOMEONE CALLS IT THE WRONG THING AND PROVOKES MY WRATH

WeAreTheRomans posted:

Cars should come with preventative measures that ensure the death of people in the other car if they crash into you.

https://twitter.com/GhamGraham/status/879059924009005056

:smuggo:

Lord of the Llamas
Jul 9, 2002

EULER'VE TO SEE IT VENN SOMEONE CALLS IT THE WRONG THING AND PROVOKES MY WRATH

WeAreTheRomans posted:

How can you be so smug admitting your analogy is loving stupid?

I hate you Twitter man

The analogy marched on!

https://twitter.com/GhamGraham/status/879064118766039041

:smuggo:

Lord of the Llamas
Jul 9, 2002

EULER'VE TO SEE IT VENN SOMEONE CALLS IT THE WRONG THING AND PROVOKES MY WRATH

radmonger posted:

If you are saying some such scenario definitely cannot happen, then it is not immmoral to give orders for retaliation as they will definitely never be read.

Small-scale nuclear weapons like Trident either do nothing but deter, or take the world from a scenario where a man successfully used nuclear weapons to one where a dead man failed at his political goals. Neither is immoral; cost-effective is a different matter.

Yes, I view Trident as utterly pointless and can't fathom any orders you could give in the letters of last resort that aren't either immoral or irrelevant. Of course if you assume there's even an infinitesimal chance of the letter being opened then you should not consider it an amoral document.

Back in reality though; It's a waste of resources, and has a political, ethical, and moral cost for sending out the wrong message to our own population and the rest of the world.

Lord of the Llamas
Jul 9, 2002

EULER'VE TO SEE IT VENN SOMEONE CALLS IT THE WRONG THING AND PROVOKES MY WRATH

radmonger posted:

In which case, you definitely don't understand the argument being made.
Maybe that doesn't worry you? It would me.

Imagine Threads, except you have just enough time to think 'that political movement I was part of? I guess we got this issue wrong'.

What on earth are are you talking about?

Lord of the Llamas
Jul 9, 2002

EULER'VE TO SEE IT VENN SOMEONE CALLS IT THE WRONG THING AND PROVOKES MY WRATH

hakimashou posted:

The point of MAD is to stop them doing it for rational reasons.

Any rational person knows that MAD only exists between the USA and Russia.

Lord of the Llamas
Jul 9, 2002

EULER'VE TO SEE IT VENN SOMEONE CALLS IT THE WRONG THING AND PROVOKES MY WRATH

Julio Cruz posted:

Osborne versus May is one of those conflicts where you desperately hope both sides will end up getting destroyed.

Speaking of MAD....

Lord of the Llamas
Jul 9, 2002

EULER'VE TO SEE IT VENN SOMEONE CALLS IT THE WRONG THING AND PROVOKES MY WRATH

Kegluneq posted:

If only this country had a real Opposition! :qq:

#LibDemFightback

Lord of the Llamas
Jul 9, 2002

EULER'VE TO SEE IT VENN SOMEONE CALLS IT THE WRONG THING AND PROVOKES MY WRATH
So basically the Tories have ensured that tomorrow all the papers will have headlines talking about how they voted to block ending the public sector pay freeze. Of course the irony is that the more Labour lead in the polls the more Tory MPs are scared of another election which means this shambles continues making Labour even more popular. It'll have to snap sooner or later though.

Lord of the Llamas
Jul 9, 2002

EULER'VE TO SEE IT VENN SOMEONE CALLS IT THE WRONG THING AND PROVOKES MY WRATH

Tesseraction posted:

Clive hasn't been on Twitter for 2 days despite usually being prolific. Gonna guess he wasn't swanning around Westminster all day before mysteriously disappearing. Hope he's all right.

Isn't he on his honeymoon or something?

Lord of the Llamas
Jul 9, 2002

EULER'VE TO SEE IT VENN SOMEONE CALLS IT THE WRONG THING AND PROVOKES MY WRATH
If you think that public opinion might turn against Brexit enough to prevent it then Labour is your only option. I don't want Brexit any more than Corbyn wants Trident. But we both recognise the political reality of living in a democratic system. Especially when there's just been a loving referendum.

Lord of the Llamas
Jul 9, 2002

EULER'VE TO SEE IT VENN SOMEONE CALLS IT THE WRONG THING AND PROVOKES MY WRATH

Marxist-Jezzinist posted:

If I told pissflaps he was wrong it would be because pissflaps is wrong. That would be my motivation.

I hope you like the sound of goalposts moving!

Lord of the Llamas
Jul 9, 2002

EULER'VE TO SEE IT VENN SOMEONE CALLS IT THE WRONG THING AND PROVOKES MY WRATH

radmonger posted:

If there had been a referendum that said 'Trident is good', and then the party in office was interpreting that as meaning 'nuke the Sun now', but then their minority government collapsed over that and you came to power, would you feel similarly obliged to press the metaphorical big red button?

Are you drunk?

Lord of the Llamas
Jul 9, 2002

EULER'VE TO SEE IT VENN SOMEONE CALLS IT THE WRONG THING AND PROVOKES MY WRATH

Coohoolin posted:

Goddammit Corbyn and his loving Brexit whips. Wasn't there an article shared here a while back about how a lot of it is McDonnell and Abbott's influence that drives Corbyn's euroscepticism?

It seems odd to me that people expect Labour to pursue a divisive policy only supported by about 20% of the country at the moment.

It worked super good for the #LibDemFightback after all.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Lord of the Llamas
Jul 9, 2002

EULER'VE TO SEE IT VENN SOMEONE CALLS IT THE WRONG THING AND PROVOKES MY WRATH

Pissflaps posted:

80% of the country wants a hard brexit?

No, but only 20% is "hard remain". Not much more than that want "hard brexit" either. The fact is the Labour's currently policy is the most reflective of the national mood. I'm not happy about it but pigfucker called a referendum and we have to at least be seen to giving it a chance before we try and turn this ship(wreck) around.

If Labour had whipped for an amendment to stay in the single market it's exactly what the Tories would want to bring politics back to being only about Brexit.

  • Locked thread