|
anyone have a reaosn i shouldn't be? maybe something i'm not considering. he's no doubt gonna get replaced by someone with poo poo for brains but it's possible they'd be a bit less crypto-fascist seeming than bannon
|
#
?
Aug 18, 2017 22:13
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 3, 2024 23:32 |
|
|
doesnt really change poo poo
|
|
#
?
Aug 18, 2017 22:17
|
|
|
Most of bannons ideas were so loving terrible they were seen as reprehensible by nearly everyone anytime they were floated. If he's replaced with someone slightly better they slip some more passable but still terrible legislation onto that fuckin desk.
|
|
#
?
Aug 18, 2017 22:18
|
|
|
landgrabber posted:TRUMP
|
|
#
?
Aug 18, 2017 22:19
|
|
|
while i agree with the OP, bannon was in the doghouse by mid-february and became a dead man walking ever since, soDarkman Fanpage posted:doesnt really change poo poo
|
|
#
?
Aug 18, 2017 22:52
|
|
|
bannon was one of the few voices against truly awful foreign policy poo poo, because he saw them as wastes of energy that could be spent on truly awful domestic policy poo poo so it's not -totally- a good thing
|
|
#
?
Aug 19, 2017 01:23
|
|
|
Ze Pollack posted:bannon was one of the few voices against truly awful foreign policy poo poo, because he saw them as wastes of energy that could be spent on truly awful domestic policy poo poo He was a voice for different truly awful foreign policy poo poo, he was one of the people pushing not to certify iran holding up their end of the nuclear deal despite even the iran diehards going "yeah they're clean."
|
|
#
?
Aug 19, 2017 02:08
|
|
|
bannon was just an adviser trump is the brains, and he never listened to advice
|
|
#
?
Aug 19, 2017 02:40
|
|
|
bannon and his ilk were responsible for the only appealing parts of trump's campaign: promises to bring back protectionism and american jobs and infrastructure
|
|
#
?
Aug 19, 2017 03:01
|
|
|
bannon had those crazy populist/anti-establishment tinges that you only see in real actual fascists, he will be replaced by something less scary and edgy but ultimately just as deadly it's weird tho. one dead protester and trump essentially ejects what has served as his brain. on the other hand, dubya kept with turdblossom to the bitter end.
|
|
#
?
Aug 19, 2017 03:08
|
|
|
Ze Pollack posted:bannon was one of the few voices against truly awful foreign policy poo poo papa_november posted:it's weird tho. one dead protester and trump essentially ejects what has served as his brain. on the other hand, dubya kept with turdblossom to the bitter end. plus, bush and rove go back years. trump and bannon go back months
|
|
#
?
Aug 19, 2017 06:49
|
|
|
papa_november posted:bannon had those crazy populist/anti-establishment tinges that you only see in real actual fascists, he will be replaced by something less scary and edgy but ultimately just as deadly I'm pretty the Bannon exit had been in the works for weeks, at least that's what Maggie Haberman said and she seemed to have a lot of info on the whole deal.
|
|
#
?
Aug 19, 2017 06:53
|
|
|
i guarantee you that bannon's responsible for a great deal of the white house leaks
|
|
#
?
Aug 19, 2017 07:05
|
|
|
Now every leak is going to be one of the clearly-written-by-jared leaks.
|
|
#
?
Aug 19, 2017 07:06
|
|
|
race bannon wanted to raise the top tax brackets above 40%
|
|
#
?
Aug 19, 2017 08:32
|
|
|
I never imagined we'd have a president that makes George W. Bush look like a criminal mastermind, but now here we are
|
|
|
#
?
Aug 19, 2017 12:35
|
|
|
get that OUT of my face posted:plus, bush and rove go back years. trump and bannon go back months Months is a lifetime for ratfuck king Trump, though, so it's comparable.
|
|
#
?
Aug 19, 2017 13:52
|
|
|
Isn't he just going from marginalised walking corpse to loud media voice, now he's just trumps man on the outside, if anything maybe he'll be more influential than before idunno
|
|
#
?
Aug 19, 2017 14:19
|
|
|
get that OUT of my face posted:every person nominated for Secretary of the Army decided to withdraw when they heard about what bannon wanted to do.
|
|
#
?
Aug 20, 2017 00:33
|
|
|
frankenfreak posted:What did he want? A face-to-face discussion.
|
|
#
?
Aug 20, 2017 00:43
|
|
|
steve bannon please post in this thread
|
|
#
?
Aug 20, 2017 01:44
|
|
|
TheDon01 posted:Most of bannons ideas were so loving terrible they were seen as reprehensible by nearly everyone anytime they were floated. If he's replaced with someone slightly better they slip some more passable but still terrible legislation onto that fuckin desk. trump thought they were pretty aces
|
|
#
?
Aug 20, 2017 02:10
|
|
|
Fewer jokes about self succ
|
|
#
?
Aug 20, 2017 03:02
|
|
|
I thought Steve Bannon was a great president. I hope the next guy does just as good.
|
|
#
?
Aug 20, 2017 03:24
|
|
|
frankenfreak posted:What did he want? to not invade Iran.
|
|
#
?
Aug 20, 2017 18:34
|
|
|
get that OUT of my face posted:i guarantee you that bannon's responsible for a great deal of the white house leaks his final interview where he talked about north korea and china was SUPER cocainey, like he blatantly got high and started popping off to some guy I bet he does that a lot except with that interview he hosed up and forgot to say it was off the record or background
|
|
#
?
Aug 20, 2017 19:04
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 3, 2024 23:32 |
|
|
walgreenslatino posted:to not invade Iran. that doesn't sound like something bannon would want
|
|
#
?
Aug 20, 2017 19:11
|
|