Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
 
  • Locked thread
Kilroy
Oct 1, 2000
If the Democrats don't get their poo poo together and embrace socialism they're going to fully clear the way for full-on fascism of the unironic Nazi variety, just in time for climate change to wipe out human civilization on the planet Earth. And I'll be glad for it, because I'd rather be murdered by Nazis than have Hillary Clinton's smug loving face at another book signing talking about how all this poo poo is my fault.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Kilroy
Oct 1, 2000

The Glumslinger posted:

(Yes, I'm aware that Biden has huge popularity because lots of people think Onion Joe Biden is real, I just thought this was funny)
It's difficult for centrists to credibly champion the things that people want because they've opposed all that poo poo at some point in their political career. Joe Biden is no exception no matter how many Onion articles get written about him. No one is going to believe Biden if he says he's in favor of single payer, or banning private prisons, etc.

Kilroy
Oct 1, 2000

Trabisnikof posted:

I think you underestimate how willing people are to believe bullshit they want to hear.
Republicans / Russians / whoever will spin up a bunch of bullshit concern trolling outfits and saturate social media with a bunch of stories about how Biden is full of poo poo. The propaganda will be effective because it's not exactly wrong. The media will pick up on it as well.

Like seriously this is exactly what happened with Clinton why do you think it will be any different next time?

Kilroy
Oct 1, 2000

Condiv posted:

not yet there aren't
:agreed: I'm not sure who that's supposed to be?

Kilroy
Oct 1, 2000

SulphagneSocialist posted:

This is me officially getting on the gently caress Joe Biden train. Bottom floor baby. He's Hillary Clinton with worse positions but he's a creepy white dude who loves to mack on women in public, so him winning would reaffirm everything we think is terrible about America.
Same, although if nothing else Joe Biden has at least the political instincts of a cornered rat, which already puts at a huge advantage against most of the Democratic party. He comes from a time when Democrats almost weren't a total waste. You can imagine him just going ahead and doing what people loving want, once in a great while, as opposed to endless patronizing bullshit about how lower wages and higher inequality and hollowed-out educational systems and more prisons and no jail time for cops who commit murder and so on, are all good for America.

Maybe you can only imagine it, but it's at least imaginable.

Kilroy
Oct 1, 2000

Freakazoid_ posted:

doesn't she support payday loans or some poo poo?
Uh... no? Like, completely the opposite what the gently caress are you talking about?

http://www.msnbc.com/msnbc/warren-wasserman-schultz-clash-over-payday-lenders as one example.

Kilroy
Oct 1, 2000
What the gently caress kind of brain damage is it where people constantly attribute the opposite of a thing to a person and is there some virus we can engineer to neutralize this in the human population?

Maybe democracy isn't such a great idea after all.

Kilroy
Oct 1, 2000

yronic heroism posted:

"Democratic socialism" isn't actually socialism though. It's just using the word. It really just seems to mean expanded welfare state to include college/health care. The Bernie platforn doesn't really represent much of an ideological schism outside of trade. And I suspect trade deals would still get done with Bernie too.
The core value of democratic socialism is employee ownership and democratic control of industry within that context. It is socialism.

Kilroy
Oct 1, 2000

yronic heroism posted:

What policy has Sanders proposed to establish employee ownership?
What does that have to do with anything? You claimed democratic socialism isn't socialism. You are wrong.

Kilroy
Oct 1, 2000

steinrokkan posted:

Those two categories can not coexist. Democratic socialism merely tries to impose a limit on arbitrary decision making by property owners, it gives employees no positive control.
What can not coexist? Democratic control of industry and employee ownership? How do you figure?

Kilroy
Oct 1, 2000
I mean I'm not going to post the Wikipedia link, but perhaps some of you need to Google a bit or something before running your idiot mouths?

Freakazoid_ posted:

i don't think you know what thread you're in
yeah I guess not :shrug:

Kilroy
Oct 1, 2000

yronic heroism posted:

The whole point of this thread was discussing specific political figures and Ytlaya contends Sanders is a socialist. So the conversation is about pressing for an example of this supposed socialism. Whether some theoretical "democratic socialism" is socialist doesn't answer whether the ideology as defined/proposed by Bernie Sanders is. Maybe not as fascinating as picking apart comments divorced from their context, but oh well.
Ah okay I misread you then - fine. I will point out you seem to be missing Ytlaya's point, however.

Kilroy
Oct 1, 2000

steinrokkan posted:

Private property and worker democracy.
Okay you're going to need to expand on that because we already have workplace democracy right now for some businesses, and I'm pretty sure we still have private property.

Are you looking at this from some Randian perspective or something where any imposition on a company (like forcing worker representation on a board or something) is viewed as "theft" and therefore is equivalent to the abolition of private property? Because if so I have some bad news for you about the current regulatory regime...

Kilroy
Oct 1, 2000

steinrokkan posted:

What the gently caress

What gave you the impression i was talking from a libertarian perspective

Also there is no significant worker democracy in any western country. All forms of such have been relegated to vestigial roles.
Trade unions in Germany are sort of what I'm talking about although with much greater scope and power.

My reaction is based on your apparent assertion that workplace democracy precludes private property. That doesn't make any sense to me.

Kilroy
Oct 1, 2000

Freakazoid_ posted:

This gives me hope that I, a fat neckbearded goon, can walk into the local political arena, say "hey everybody I'm socialist", and have a decent shot at winning.
I'd vote for you despite your "Liz Warren looooves payday loans" fuckup, assuming you were the only socialist.

Kilroy
Oct 1, 2000

yronic heroism posted:

"I'm just saying there was good growth and popular programs like the autobahn back then. Why bring up the other stuff? That wasn't covered in my book on German politics."
holy poo poo this is a dumb post

this is the thread winner for most stupid goddamn post in TDOME up to this point, though I'm sure you'll outdo yourself eventually

Kilroy
Oct 1, 2000
"hey maybe the democrats should run on a platform of making the economy not be a loving grind for 99.9% of the population"

yronic heroism "oh you mean like hitler" :smug:

seriously dude go look at yourself in the mirror and then punch yourself in the face, hard

Kilroy
Oct 1, 2000
it's the qr code that really nails it, though

Kilroy
Oct 1, 2000

JeffersonClay posted:

Offensive acts can be motivated by a desire to defend the status quo.
don't sign your posts

Kilroy
Oct 1, 2000

Majorian posted:

And black voters, particularly women, seem to be holding the party accountable. It's good that Tom Perez is acknowledging that the Dems can't take black women for granted, but I hope he actually listens to them, instead of just paying them lip service. I think he'll find that black voters and left-populists of all races have a lot of goals in common.
That article indicates they aren't getting the message:

quote:

Speaking to reporters, Jackson Lee attributed the decline in support to younger voters. “Every generation has a different way of looking at life,” she said. Today’s young people came of age under President Barack Obama when “all was well,” so now the Democratic Party needs to “talk values” particularly to younger black women. Jackson Lee insisted she’s “not daunted at all” by the drop off in support, but had a clear message for her party. “Democrats do well to listen to the standard-bearers of the party,” she said. “We need to shine our armor. We need to buff up our teapot.”

Kilroy
Oct 1, 2000

Heck Yes! Loam! posted:

I get that there is no good faith between the Democratic party and the left, but there are good people trying to mend that, and it doesn't get much attention. DSA is something that appeals to many people you would call centrists, and we can hopefully agree that there are really positive developments on that front. Hopefully people like you and I can come together to make the changes we want to see a reality.
Maybe political moderates (in the actual sense, not the "really just votes Republican 100% of the time" sense), yes perhaps though there is a lot of inertia there, to say nothing of all the propaganda against socialism to overcome. But, sure, if socialism is going to be a thing then a big part of making that happen is going to be getting on board the people who mostly vote Democratic but either aren't that into party politics (and so for the time being are not much help in turning that around), or who think attacking the leadership undermines the party somehow. Then you've got the Democratic libertarian faction which includes several of the sea-lioning dickheads in this thread, and the main thing to think about there is whether they're insignificant enough to just ignore completely or whether we have to actually make the effort to crush them like bugs / drive them to the GOP where they belong anyway.

That's the electorate, though. If you're talking about the leadership of the Democratic party I think you're just completely wrong. They're enemies to be defeated - nothing more. As far as the left is concerned they take turns pretending it doesn't exist, mocking it, undermining it, and when all else fails trying to take credit for its accomplishments. The Democratic leadership is no more a friend to the left than the board of directors of Breitbart News.

Kilroy
Oct 1, 2000
iirc this started (over a week ago) when yronic heroism claimed that the democratic base used to be southern racists (correct but not controversial) and that all the losing democratic presidential candidates since then have been super leftist (lol no)

I'm not sure what point he was trying to make and probably he doesn't know either, but that's how it started - calling that out for the idiocy that it is doesn't strike me as trying to rehabilitate LBJ but maybe I missed some posts

Kilroy
Oct 1, 2000
point being, yronic heroism is such a terrible poster that he can inspire a weeks worth of bad posts in the bad post thread, makes u think

Kilroy
Oct 1, 2000

turtle_07 posted:

I miss the old Dems are a waste thread. More dems being a waste, less semantic arguments where JC awards himself points for being technically correct.
It would be more bearable if he were even technically correct.

Kilroy
Oct 1, 2000

Helsing posted:

Are you trying to imply there's some necessary link between support for redistributive policies at home and imperialism abroad? If so go ahead and make that argument. It seems pretty clear that nobody who was calling for a return to Great Society style liberalism was actually cheering for a Johnson-style foreign policy, so unless you want to argue that the Great Society somehow necessitated the Vietnam War then I don't really get why you would want to keep returning to this.
yronic isn't but JeffersonClay certainly did:

JeffersonClay posted:

Vietnam was a pragmatic calculation that it would look good to be tough on communism which would help when passing great society programs by defusing accusations of socialism!. So when people say democrats should just copy Johnson to get real popular again, Vietnam is actually quite relevant. Johnson was threading a needle by attacking both unrestrained capitalism with minimal government and revolutionary socialism. when Ronald Reagan put out records saying Medicare would lead to a socialist dictatorship Johnson could respond he was bombing the poo poo out of revolutionary socialists and Medicare was just about taking care of grandma.
If we're playing by yronic's rulebook where you've got to waddle in here and argue with people who share 95% of your ideology, every time they make a dumb post (or every time a good post of theirs is deliberately misread as such, by the usual group), then turnabout is fair play: yronic why didn't you call JC a dumb rear end in a top hat for this post? You agree with it, then?

Kilroy
Oct 1, 2000

JeffersonClay posted:

I dunno maybe he doesn't derive the same odd pleasure from flaunting a reading comprehension deficit that you do?
you literally said the Vietnam War was a pragmatic calculation to help pass Great Society programs, you dumb poo poo

those are your words, quoted back to you, you weaselly gently caress

Kilroy
Oct 1, 2000

JeffersonClay posted:

Yes and a historical link, as obviously existed, doesn't imply one cannot exist without the other today, you tragic simpleton.
Yes but you implied it anyway.

Kilroy
Oct 1, 2000
On the other hand you're already universally hated on these forums so there's really no need to continue to enable your bullshit. Ta-ta.

Kilroy
Oct 1, 2000

Heck Yes! Loam! posted:

Not wrong.

I think we all agree Calibanibal is the official best poster.
Unofficial best poster. The party line is, he's poo poo.

Kilroy
Oct 1, 2000

JeffersonClay posted:

If someone sat around posting about FDR being a slaver all the time, but refused to talk about republicans who promote prison slavery, I'd think hmm, maybe that person is just using prison slavery as a cudgel.
so is your out here that you have a standing desk, or...

Kilroy
Oct 1, 2000
I think the person who posted the Kristallnacht thing changed it and said he meant to refer to the Rohm Putsch / Night of the Long Knives, but hosed it up. Pretty egregious mistake to make of course. Not to mention, even saying we need to Rohm-Putsch the DNC is in really poor taste as well.

Kilroy
Oct 1, 2000

yronic heroism posted:

People advocating for a "krystallnacht" are by definition Nazis? Why is that controversial?
People advocating for a literal Kristallnacht are literal Nazis. People using Kristallnacht as a clumsy metaphor for political revolution (and even if they actually meant to use another analogy which is only slighter "better") are just assholes.

The Kristallnacht poster is not actually a Nazi if you were reading the posts. He's just an unrelatable poo poo poster who should take a long break from the internet.

Kilroy
Oct 1, 2000

yronic heroism posted:

I see... "It was just locker room Nazism" :ironicat:
yes that's what I said you disingenuous gently caress

Kilroy
Oct 1, 2000

yronic heroism posted:

It's an apt analogy... both are claiming the behavior is inappropriate but NBD.
I didn't claim it was no big deal. I said it stopped short of Nazism. I guess in your muddled centrist headcanon anything that isn't literally Nazism is negotiable as acceptable behavior, but try to understand I don't subscribe to an ideology that allows me to pragmatically justify just about anything, provided it isn't too unpopular.

Kilroy
Oct 1, 2000

yronic heroism posted:

Why are you justifying people using Nazi symbols/concepts then?
I didn't justify it you dumb rear end. I said it doesn't make the person a Nazi.

You see I have to be more careful than you about who I label a Nazi or a fascist, and who I don't, because those are things I actually want to put a permanent stop to by any means necessary. Liberals such as yourself who are comfortable with fascism don't have this problem, hence the second sentence of my post you quoted.

Kilroy
Oct 1, 2000
Like when GWB compared the WoT to the Crusades people said it was a stupid and needlessly inflammatory analogy and he shouldn't have done it, but as far as I know nobody suggested he was literally answering a call by the Pope to take back the Holy Land for Christendom by force.

Kilroy
Oct 1, 2000
yronic I was going to continue but in all honestly I think you are just too dumb to have a productive conversation with

I'm exasperated - try learning what words mean tia

Kilroy
Oct 1, 2000

yronic heroism posted:

Kilroy (who has wished death on other posters)
wrong on the facts here, btw

Kilroy
Oct 1, 2000
yronic heroism: wrong on the facts, wrong about Nazis, wrong for USPOL THUNDERDOME

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Kilroy
Oct 1, 2000
it was a bad post and I deserved the ban but it was not wishing death on a poster or threatening them

but it was close - too close

it's so weird though that you harp on that every chance you get, while there are other posters here who have repeatedly done worse and you don't have anything to say about it

like I don't see you bringing up fulchrum's much more explicit death threats toward me, every time he posts, for example

so weird

  • Locked thread