Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
 
  • Post
  • Reply
PJOmega
May 5, 2009
Bravo BotL, now that is a lovely deadpan backhanded OP.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

PJOmega
May 5, 2009

Atlas Hugged posted:

The thing that gets me about Rothfuss fandom is that there's just so little to be a fan of. He's written two novels and a smattering of short stories, all in the same world, and maintains a blog. I think he's done some podcasting? Plus there's the various Kickstarters he's participated in. And all of it is set in the same world.

I spent a six hour drive with a woman and her boyfriend listening to her extoll the virtues of NotW. She also tried to get her roommate to read the Sword of Truth books by Goodkind. She was also trying to jump from her boyfriend to me and was a hardcore masochist in to BDSM.

Wait I'm starting to see a pattern.

PJOmega
May 5, 2009

LASER BEAM DREAM posted:

So what was it that caused the books to be liked by so many people after the first read like myself and, I’m assuming, a bunch of other people in this thread?

I read the second book in two sittings the day of and after the release, and even with that one only just started to have a vague sense of WTF during the Furilion or whatever’s name part. It was only after reading the prior threads here that all the serious flaws started to really sink in.

The audiobook is beautifully narrated and sounds lovely on first pass. Beyond that I got nothing.

PJOmega
May 5, 2009
Imgur has weekly shrines to the "Kingkiller Chronicles, best book series I've ever read. Right up there with literary masterpieces like the Sword of Truth and Sword of Shannara series."

PJOmega
May 5, 2009

Kchama posted:

Yeah it's one of those things where it's very obvious poor writing. And then you get to Tarbean where Kvothe forgets he knows magic, Ben stops existing, and Kvothe forgets he has amazing wilderness survival skills and decides to stay in a city that hates him instead of hanging out in the woods like he did before without any trouble.

Tarbean made no sense with its timeline. And I know it fits with the rest of the dreck, but it was so jarring that it stood out against the heavy recommendations I had received for the books.

He has no reason to be in Tarbean for even a week, much less the months (years?) he spends there. It's abject misery, a poor fantasy boy's travelogue adventure that seemed and seems to be from an entirely different series. Much like the bulk of Book 2.

PJOmega
May 5, 2009

TheGreatEvilKing posted:

I just enjoy how the plot is supposedly the Amyr and Chandrian, but there's so little of that.

Like we ALMOST could have got something with the Mayor in book 2 before Kvothe is too dumb to figure out Meluan's his aunt.

I still love what another poster wrote, and it would be the best thing in these books by far. When Chronicler casually mentions he pissed his Aunt off with the Mayor* and Kvothe stops and goes "oh poo poo she was my aunt?"

*Is it really spelled Mayor? I figured it was Meijer or something. Audio book problems.

PJOmega
May 5, 2009

Kchama posted:

THREE YEARS. Three years he was there! And he basically made no attempt to find either of the guys who could or would adopt him.

I've heard theories that it's one of those prewritten stories that he just dropped in, and that's why it didn't fit in at all. Like when he murdered the fake Edema Ruh later on, which is told in an entirely different style and acts like Kvothe is a mysterious molester stranger we've never seen before.

Yeah, I think that theory is pretty on the nose. Every writer has random thought pieces they'll jot down. It would explain the lack of magic. The lack of relevance to the world at large. The difference in world feel.

Same with, as you mentioned, the fake not-gypsies. Or world war 1 in the forest. Or sex ninjas. Or sex faery. Or love and war in the time of Go. They're all tonally dissonant and feel like they were written as separate pieces that got round pegged into the square hole that is his "completed three book epic."

PJOmega
May 5, 2009

Cicero posted:

At least the series spawned a rad game: https://www.amazon.com/dp/B01LFA7QFK/

I've played it a handful of times and it's pretty fun!

It's a beautiful game.

PJOmega
May 5, 2009


quote:

The show is not a straight adaptation of The Kingkiller Chronicle—that’s what the films are for—but rather will take place in the same world a generation before the events of the books

Ffs.


quote:

“Pat Rothfuss’ Kingkiller books are among the most read and re-read in our home,” Miranda said in an earlier press release. “It’s a world you want to spend lifetimes in, as his many fans will attest. Pat also writes about the act of makingmusic more beautifully than any novelist I’ve ever read. I can’t wait to play a part in bringing this world to life onscreen.”

Isn't this the same person who made Hamilton's music?

PJOmega
May 5, 2009

Dienes posted:

Rothfuss has reviewed hundreds of books on Goodreads, and those that he's bothered to give a star rating are nearly always 5-stars. It really reeks of someone trying to suck up to other authors.

One of his 5-star reviews is for The Giving Tree. He has a couple sentences on how the boy is a selfish little poo poo but, hey, the tree is happy, life lessons are complex, the book is ambiguous for how we are supposed to take it.

One of his 1-star reviews is for another children's book, Eloise. He detests the naughty little girl and goes on for multiple paragraphs on how she's a bitch.

Wooooooooooooooooooooooow.

quote:

You know what Eloise reminds me of? She reminds me of a stereotypical American. The sort of American that people believe in over in Germany and Spain and China. She is loud, spoiled, rude, and entitled. 

Also somebody touched the poop.

PJOmega
May 5, 2009

the old ceremony posted:

my hate for rothfuss has become quite personal

i'm going to find him

He's the gooniest loving goon. I wonder what his screenname is

PJOmega
May 5, 2009

The only way this isn't the most "what the gently caress bullshit" is if he considers doing writing passes as "reading." For a good author I could see redoing paragraphs a few dozen times, even if it's only editing a few words at a time.

Of course, I don't think Rothfuss' writing regimine is quite so thorough, so what in the ever loving gently caress is this bullshit?

PJOmega
May 5, 2009

Dienes posted:

LKH was less the editor and more the tumultuous divorce. Don't write you and your hubby as the main character and love interest in a book series, folks.

By the same token an editor with greater control could have tightened the reins and told LKH no.

Though I guess they're still selling well so who knows.

PJOmega
May 5, 2009

from the comments posted:

I loved the “Name of the Wind” more than I have ever loved a book and I am a voracious reader. I used to regularly reread it every year or two.

This person reminds me of the morbidly obese person who goes to the gym religiously every day for years and doesn't lose weight. They're convinced that going to the gym, putting the treadmill at 0.5 mph for thirty minutes will cancel out their otherwise sedentary lifestyle and poo poo diet.

Rereading NotW 6+ times? That's loving lunacy!

PJOmega
May 5, 2009

I can't even be angry at the author of this hack job. It's literally ad copy for people who believe they're smarter than other people because they read, even if what they're reading is garbage.

PJOmega
May 5, 2009

Ornamented Death posted:

It was published by DAW.

It's akin to open mic night. You don't dare criticize anyone else, because it leaves you open to being criticized in turn.

NotW doesn't really commit any new crimes insofar as the genre is concerned. It simply lays them bare where in other books you might have to brush off a layer of dirt.

PJOmega
May 5, 2009

Chuck Buried Treasure posted:

I really want to sit down with one of the bafflingly large number of people comparing Rothfuss to Tolkien and have them have them give me a detailed breakdown on exactly what about it is Tolkienesque beyond just being fantasy.

"I liked Tolkien therefore I'm not like the other plebes who were unable to appreciate his genius. I liked Name of the Wind therefore it's a good book like Tolkien."

PJOmega
May 5, 2009

Atlas Hugged posted:

Anyone interested in an opportunity to combine Penny Arcade fans, all things Patrick Rothfuss, and two hours of live action roleplaying?

https://tabletop.events/conventions/td-at-pax-south-2018

Isn't this basically an escape room with an extra layer of cruft?

PJOmega
May 5, 2009

Solice Kirsk posted:

They're donating less than 10% of ticket sales.

That is crazy. Who do they think they are, NFL Breast Cancer Awareness merchandise?

PJOmega
May 5, 2009

latinotwink1997 posted:

This thread is like the written form of that pretentious douche from Good Will Hunting that gets slammed on by Matt Damon. Biggest circle jerk ever with no redeeming discussion on a bad book. Thread should be closed and stop taking up TBB space.

JivJov, you didn't need to rereg to throw in your hot take.

PJOmega
May 5, 2009

eXXon posted:

.

Besides that, I don't think I've ever read anything quite like Deoch's speech explaining why there is absolutely nothing Denna can do to earn a living besides her bizarre short-term high-class escort gig. It's especially jarring when Kvothe's other potential love interest is a university student notable for little else besides being young, attractive, and having her life saved by Kvothe when she was too paralyzed by fear to move. Well, ok, maybe he has a point then. Still, it's like he smashed the fourth wall to pieces just to give a lame excuse for why he's writing such godawful female characters. :goonsay:

He's a redditor trying to argue that egalitarianism is needed because if women are denied opportunities they'll use their APPEARANCE to be WHORES instead of falling in LOVE with NICE GUYS. Mix in some hypergamy, biotruths, "I'd be a feminist but SJWs have ruined it," and memes and he'd fit right into most internet conversations.

It could've been a good commentary on divides in gender and class but like so much else in these books it falls so astonishingly short of the goal it's hard to tell where it was originally aimed.

PJOmega
May 5, 2009
That is still such a loving creepy post to see someone proudly affix their name to.

PJOmega
May 5, 2009
On a tangentially related note is there a good write-up/analysis of Book of the New Sun? I mainlined them as audiobooks and they were wonderful but holy hell is my mind not wrapped around what I listened to. I know there are levels that I'm not even aware of.

PJOmega
May 5, 2009
Ah, the paradox of enjoying trash versus calling something enjoyable trash.

PJOmega
May 5, 2009
It's funny/sad seeing all the people happily saying they've read the first two books multiple times and praising him as an author without equal in the literary world.

No wonder he'll never publish the third book. He knows he's a hack who got lucky and can never, ever live up to what his audience is invested in believing.

PJOmega
May 5, 2009

TheGreatEvilKing posted:

Pretty much. I can count the number of books I've put down unfinished on one hand, but as I stopped being a teenager I realized just how bad Rothfuss actually was.

Has anyone called him out on the long section about how Kvothe's parents not being married made it a purer, truer love which was in no way justifying him having a kid out of wedlock?

No one has called him out on anything. Not in a way he's actually addressed or at risk of addressing. The man has his cult that will continue to praise him ceaselessly. They're nerds. They're defined by their consumption. If they acknowledge something they have defended is bad it would cause so much dissonance that they simply might cease to exist.

PJOmega
May 5, 2009

my bony fealty posted:

Apparently the show cuts out the stupid Randian bullshit and is mostly a generic fantasy story that's vaguely based on the books

source: my sister who loves that show and is super lefty. maybe she's just making excuses.

Nah, she's on the money. The books are hot garbage but the series is camp that's basically Hercules or Xena Lite.

PJOmega
May 5, 2009
Sanderson is utilitarian to an extreme. It feels like an RPG rulebook turned into a fiction series for the type of person to whom empathy is a superpower.

They're perfectly serviceable books. But if I learn that Sanderson is actually a sophisticated Markov Chain generator I wouldn't be surprised.

PJOmega
May 5, 2009

Khizan posted:

Sanderson is the textbook definition of quantity over quality, imo.

To be fair, he's also not bad. Neither his writing or his personal history (afaik) are problematic. In an industry that is rife with hosed up authors writing dog whistle screeds on issues they know nothing on that alone garners value.

Reading Sanderson's latest doorstopper won't improve your life much. It also doesn't push hosed up ideas on race or religion or economics or philosophy.

It's entertainment for entertainment's sake. It's a way to fill time. At worst it is aggressively mediocre.

And even mediocrity can have moments of brilliance.

PJOmega
May 5, 2009

Sham bam bamina! posted:

This is pure equivocation. A billion pages of imaginary rules do not stop being bad simply by virtue of not specifically being morally offensive.

As an illustration, my not being a Nazi does not make my posts any less terrible.

You're right, your posting is bad. Or at least this post of yours is.

As I said, his writing is mediocre. It is white bread. It fills without nutrition. It is a perfect encapsulation of the mire that genre fiction has willingly entered to the tune of their audience's consumption. The audience which will gleefully consume the nth iteration of The Hero's Journey because they are chasing a nostalgia hit from when their life and by extension the world was simpler.

It also is largely empty of the standard pitfalls of the genre, from what I've listened to. (Mistborn 1-3, first two books of his doorstopper with Magic Jedi and power armor that I can't remember the name of). There are few if any damsels in distress. There isn't weirdly transparent uncomfortable racial castes. Genders are treated as equal. Societies are merit based. It tackles social class issues and immobility. In these ways it is refreshing.

As was stated earlier the greatest crime that art can commit is mediocrity. And I do agree with that. But, and this is a significant but, I do not consider most of our entertainment to be art though we are poorer for it. Not in the culture we are part of. We are a culture of consumption. Endless consumption. A day doesn't go by without it. It is twisted into our lives, largely as a vehicle of advertisement. Both of products and of lifestyles.

Art challenges an audience. It evokes emotion. It evokes feeling. It's difficult to truly digest. You have to roll it around in your mind. Revisit it multiple times, from various viewpoints. You have to take time to think on it. And that is antithetical to our culture. The cult of the new. Always be producing so we can always be consuming. Even the artists in the entertainment industry have to face the fact that it is an industry. That their creative is always going to class with those who demand conversion rates, market share, price per million metrics and the bottom line of how much money will it make.

There are many people who have written on this more eloquently and with greater depth than I care to in this moment. It's something that is way beyond the scope of this conversation or even this thread. Hell, maybe even this forum.

But in the end, I will gladly put Sanderson above Rothfuss. A 14 year old absorbjng Sanderson is going to simply be along for a book that compresses and strips down a lot of genre fiction conventions. That same 14 year old consuming Rothfuss is going to have some really hosed ideas regarding what is normal.

To say nothing about that 14 year old instead consuming Goodkind or Ringo.

PJOmega
May 5, 2009

Karnegal posted:

.
EDIT: It's also really weirds me out that no one does anything that isn't perfectly chaste because Mormon, but he's fine opening a book with people being tortured bloodily for thousands of years.

Good post overall, but I swear this is more of a genre thing. Most genre fiction protagonists are as chaste as a Hallmark holiday special. I get that they're predominantly written for teenage boys but it's really interesting.

PJOmega
May 5, 2009

Khizan posted:

No, that doesn't add value. All it does is avoid reducing it.

"The author is not a Nazi" is not a bonus that adds points; it's a basic expectation and meeting it does not deduct them.

You and Sham Bam done sucking each other off in an attempt to prove who is the least original?

PJOmega
May 5, 2009

Habibi posted:

Now if it would just happen to SMG...

I thought SMG entered into the forum code and couldn't be purged without finally killing this dead comedy forum? That would explain why he hasn't seen any new film in the last few years. Not that it ever stops him from trying to give his sophomore year analysis of whatever is on theatres.

Edit: Isn't it just a new iteration of the Bevets bot from Fark?

PJOmega
May 5, 2009

Evil Fluffy posted:


Though it'd have turned out to be far, far better if the guy making the medicine was just a colossal moron who was making proper medicine and didn't realize that metals like lead in and of themselves are extremely bad to use for making medicine and not Generic Evil Guy Poisoning Mayor Because Reasons.

Thank you! I was still riding the exultant praise that this book received from one of my flings. The first book was passable but well narrated. I really thought that the big reveal was going to be exactly as you said, this doctor was a pretender much like Kvothe and the difficulty would be stopping the poisoning, saving the face of his doctor, and playing them both to gain favor.

Instead it was the most bog standard "being poisoned by an advisor and only I am smart enough to catch it" thing. If it hadn't been for four hours of commuting a day I'd have deleted the audio book then. In hindsight I wish I had.

PJOmega
May 5, 2009

HIJK posted:

The hilarious part is when fans try to defend the horrid musician bits though you can say that about the entire book really

What's astonishing is Lin-Manuel Miranda praising Rothfuss's writing of music. It's loving bizarro world.

PJOmega
May 5, 2009

Nakar posted:

Considering it restricts the range of your instrument, wouldn't most people in an audience be okay with a musician taking fifteen seconds to switch out an instrument in order to continue a great performance rather than watch them struggle to produce a workable performance with busted poo poo?

Because I would just be like, hey man accidents happen, swap out your lute. I'd be kind of pissed if he just tried to keep going.

Even that would be a bitch and a half, as playing an unfamiliar instrument on the fly would be impressive.

Rothfuss wrote about music in much the same way anyone who isn't in an artistic discipline writes about it. It's all about feel, putting your will into the work, etc, etc. It's lazy magic. There's no talk of forethought. Of visualizing. Of the loving work that goes into planning to turn, for example, a block of stone into a sculpture.

In Rothfussian writing, anyone who can't sculpt is simply lacking the artistic spirit. Every person could outshine Rodin if they only wanted to badly enough.

I admit I don't know music. I barely know sculpture but I know it better than music. I wouldn't dream of writing a musician without a lot of research. Rothfuss treats it like lovely magic, in that if you're special enough your capital w Will will overcome any obstacle.

PJOmega
May 5, 2009

M_Gargantua posted:

Sensibly one of the reasons LMM is taking a whole different story set in the world is that he thinks the world is cool but Rothfuss and Kvothe are awful. There are a ton of little ideas that make for a cool fantasy show under the hood.

I'm not asking this to insult, but what aspects of the world do you find cool? Absent the Chandrian and Magic As Physics what are the neat hooks that you see?

PJOmega
May 5, 2009

So It Goes posted:

https://www.reddit.com/r/Fantasy/comments/87h2uf/patrick_rothfuss_released_the_name_of_the_wind_11/?st=JF9ZTB7L&sh=a8030292

I actually forgot what the average conception of Rothfuss books were lol. “An absolute masterpiece”.


quote:

Well I think it's a masterpiece OP. If something has that much of an effect on you personally it is.

The internet was a mistake.

PJOmega
May 5, 2009

Patrick Rothfuss, a Grown Man posted:

I love Rick and Morty with a powerful love, and I’ve played D&D since the 5th grade. So when they approached me about writing a story with both of them together? That’s some serious you-got-chocolate-in-my-peanut butter $#!& right there. I’m in. I’m all the way in. I’m gettin’ that chocolate all up in the peanut butter. Like, deep in. All the way in. It’s going to be sticky and delicious.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

PJOmega
May 5, 2009

Ccs posted:

Rothfuss' book topped another list of best fantasy novels (of the 21st century.) https://www.pastemagazine.com/articles/2018/04/the-50-best-fantasy-novels-of-the-21st-century.html?p=2

There are a lot of actually good entries on the list, like Perdido Street Station, Jonathan Strange and Mr. Norrell, and Pratchett's Nightwatch, but somehow BOTH of Rothfuss' books in an incomplete trilogy get higher rankings.

The rest are insulting but this is aggregious.

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • Post
  • Reply