A human heart posted:is that really what he looks like OP posted:Why should I read this guy’s books?
|
|
# ¿ Oct 7, 2017 16:16 |
|
|
# ¿ May 9, 2024 14:43 |
If you're still waiting for the third book after those two, sure, go for it, you're probably dead on the inside already.
|
|
# ¿ Oct 7, 2017 20:51 |
M_Gargantua posted:And I was beginning to think my dating life was boring.
|
|
# ¿ Oct 8, 2017 19:06 |
Harrow posted:For some reason I assumed Lord of Light would be a book I'd bounce off of but that description sounds pretty fantastic.
|
|
# ¿ Oct 12, 2017 18:16 |
Consistency is clearly not a requirement for Master Worldbuildingtm.
|
|
# ¿ Oct 19, 2017 16:36 |
We totally need a Marxist reading of Kingkiller.
|
|
# ¿ Oct 21, 2017 12:32 |
jivjov's review?
|
|
# ¿ Oct 22, 2017 22:28 |
Story? Planned?
|
|
# ¿ Oct 25, 2017 19:50 |
calandryll posted:It also lists the Sword of Truth pretty high, which tells me that list is poo poo.
|
|
# ¿ Nov 2, 2017 20:41 |
my bony fealty posted:Cragon would be a better name for a book than Eragon
|
|
# ¿ Nov 3, 2017 17:55 |
Then again, they did one on Steven Brust's Vlad Taltos books...
|
|
# ¿ Nov 8, 2017 20:20 |
PJOmega posted:On a tangentially related note is there a good write-up/analysis of Book of the New Sun? I mainlined them as audiobooks and they were wonderful but holy hell is my mind not wrapped around what I listened to. I know there are levels that I'm not even aware of.
|
|
# ¿ Jan 23, 2018 22:51 |
eXXon posted:I didn't dislike Name of the Wind much at first. I thought the pacing was off, and some of the dialog was certainly insipid, but I kept going based on the overwhelming praise it received assuming that interesting things would happen. It was more by the time I got to the end and read those pages of horse bartering and country bumpkin talk and the blue fire that was definitely a sign of the Chandrian but then was actually a dragon not related to the Chandrian but still the Chandrian had actually been there and left a clue... or did they? Well, that's when I realized the payof wasn't coming and started to think about what I'd actually read. I briefly considered reading the second book but the plot summary is enough for me.
|
|
# ¿ Jan 24, 2018 19:02 |
If that's your typical response to things Rothfuss tries to emulate and utterly fails at, don't ever venture anywhere near anything by Gene Wolfe.
|
|
# ¿ Jan 29, 2018 21:49 |
Pretty much. Because the world is a completely generic fantasy setting that doesn't even make sense half the time.
|
|
# ¿ Feb 15, 2018 20:32 |
Y'know, I was rereading Earthsea while on vacation and it's pretty hilarious how much Rothfuss wanted to write the first book of that. Which has like 150 pages. And actual themes. And a plot. And is much better-written.
|
|
# ¿ Aug 8, 2018 22:31 |
I blame Robin Hood.
|
|
# ¿ Sep 23, 2018 09:14 |
Strom Cuzewon posted:"it's as beautiful as a really beautiful thing" Did Edmund Blackadder write that review?
|
|
# ¿ Feb 5, 2019 14:39 |
Inspector Gesicht posted:Pillars of Eternity I gets faulted for its overwrought and heavy text, but it still had 40 hours of Baldur's Gate gameplay attached. So what does Tides of Neumenera have if the writing sucks?
|
|
# ¿ Mar 3, 2020 22:35 |
Evil Fluffy posted:His books have sold millions of copies iirc, so yes. Anyhow he won't go bankrupt in any way except creatively and that already happened.
|
|
# ¿ Mar 10, 2020 11:08 |
Ccs posted:One thing all three do is some pallet swaps on their races to try avoid seeming stereotypical. Rothfuss has ninjas! But wait, they’re BLOND ninjas. Abercrombie has his native Americans except with red hair, and Sanderson gives us white people living in an Asian setting. I honestly don't think color of hair of your completely fictional ripoffs does much to combat the laziness. anilEhilated fucked around with this message at 22:54 on Apr 26, 2020 |
|
# ¿ Apr 26, 2020 22:52 |
Ccs posted:But the women are entirely described as types of birds, which kind of undercuts the "don't worry this isn't sexist" aspect of the scene.
|
|
# ¿ Aug 11, 2020 20:18 |
I thought that was effectively dead?
|
|
# ¿ Aug 2, 2021 20:58 |
Yeah, Kingkiller seems to come off as someone trying to ape Wolfe... Except I'm not sure Rothfuss has ever heard of Wolfe.
|
|
# ¿ Nov 10, 2021 17:03 |
eXXon posted:He wrote an entire chapter after two of the keys broke on his keyboard and readers said it was the most beautiful, flowery prose they had ever set eyes on.
|
|
# ¿ Sep 8, 2022 10:48 |
Yeah, but I think it's in the old thread.
|
|
# ¿ Oct 18, 2022 15:16 |
Atlas Hugged posted:BOTL had some good riffs on The Name of the Wind, but he didn't like Book of the New Sun and was very dismissive of Gene Wolfe, so he's not exactly a pure being of energy handing out literary truths. He's just a dude with opinions. It's weird that people are hung up on him.
|
|
# ¿ Oct 23, 2022 11:23 |
mdemone posted:If he plays the unreliable narrator card then I will read it. Otherwise it's a waste to even revisit the series
|
|
# ¿ Nov 14, 2023 18:25 |
>The Patrick Rothfuss Thread: Let's Talk About Buehlman Instead
|
|
# ¿ Dec 1, 2023 21:58 |
I think it's been established pretty strongly that Rothfuss doesn't understand music in the slightest.
|
|
# ¿ Mar 15, 2024 16:32 |
Here's the thing: you'd be pretty hard-pressed to find someone who argues that Dune 5 and 6 are good. The more or less universal attitude is that the series is a downward slope (with some people, me included, thinking God Emperor the exception). I believe what you're doing here is building a strawman. The fact other books contain stupid poo poo doesn't make Rothfuss' stupid poo poo better.
|
|
# ¿ Mar 16, 2024 14:54 |
|
|
# ¿ May 9, 2024 14:43 |
Evil Fluffy posted:If there were a single reason to dismiss Rothfuss as a hack who got lucky with his first book, it's this. Despite its flaws, the first book does make an attempt at "my legends are total bullshit here's the boring reality" only for the second book to do a full 180 and bang the "actually, the legends aren't nearly as cool as the reality" drum while using even more previously-written short stories as filling for the book than NOTW did. Even the premise isn't very interesting; you could add a lot by simply turning Kvothe into an unreliable narrator and having the other two challenge and second-guess his assertion (if not trusting the reader to do that on their own which, frankly, Rothfuss doesn't have the writing chops for). But starting by straight-up "debunking" - and there's no font size lare enough for those quotes - a legend we are never given the slightest reason to give a drat about is just bad storytelling. Or Storytelling.
|
|
# ¿ Mar 18, 2024 19:10 |