|
joepinetree posted:I don't think that the BTK would necessarily be part of a second season. The way that I interpreted the second half of the show was that they were essentially showing that profiling is non-scientific and very dangerous in the hands of overconfident people. Both Dr. Carr and Holden's girlfriend go out of their way to argue that what he is doing is not scientific and has no predictive value. His girlfriend correctly points out that in the Georgia case he was working backwards from a conclusion. The BTK reference, to me at least, seems to be there just to really drive home the point that profiling isn't what its cracked up to be. After all, the BTK case is perhaps the most egregious example of the failures of profiling. There may have been cases where the profilers were "more" wrong, such as in the beltway sniper case. But the BTK case is remarkable in that there were several profiles done, and ultimately all of them were wrong. That principle was absolutely out of line. They gave him opportunity after opportunity to cut the poo poo and he wouldn't take it. The face that he refused to cease the behavior, despite the warning, demonstrates that the behavior had a powerful importance to him. That principal made his own choices and now he has to live with them. That is the most justifiable thing he did.
|
# ¿ Jan 2, 2018 01:55 |
|
|
# ¿ May 14, 2024 13:03 |