|
Neurolimal posted:Israel is losing a wild amount of money off the war, as well as hemmorhaging dual-citizens. It's not likely to do the job by itself, but anything that additionally shutters Israeli business, cuts Israeli jobs, and compels more return voyages will help if your goal is to nonviolently compel Israel to stop (which, so long as America is openly supporting mass slaughter, is the only real way to stop the bombing). While it's less violent than Israel's accelerated genocide campaign, attacking ships with missiles and kidnapping its crew is absolutely violent. Kalit fucked around with this message at 15:01 on Jan 19, 2024 |
# ¿ Jan 19, 2024 14:55 |
|
|
# ¿ May 12, 2024 16:35 |
|
OctaMurk posted:Sure, and the houthis have killed literally zero people during the blockade so they're at like 0.1/10 on the violence scale compared to israel. It's not merely "less violent", it is so much less violent that it might as well be described as nonviolent in comparison to what israel is doing As I clearly stated, nonviolent is not the same as less violent. Even much less violent Side question for the thread in general, is there any news about any of the crew members from the captured ships? I can only find references about (at least some of them) being held hostage in initial news articles. But no news since about updates, terms of release, etc. Kalit fucked around with this message at 15:37 on Jan 19, 2024 |
# ¿ Jan 19, 2024 15:15 |
|
Neurolimal posted:On that note, I feel like "Sauds almost captured their last port" is a bad barometer for how the war went, considering that we currently have an ongoing example of a militant force without any imports, whos citizens are being starved to death, and still have not been defeated. This is because of the global pressure that prevents Israel from carpet bombing the living poo poo out of everything [to an even higher degree]. It has nothing to do with the Gazan militant force. Unless you count them being smart enough to hide within the civilian population to prevent said carpet bombing, I guess.
|
# ¿ Jan 20, 2024 04:30 |
|
A big flaming stink posted:buddy do you legit think israel is restraining itself when it comes to attacking gaza? Obviously? Otherwise they would have destroyed every hospital to begin with.
|
# ¿ Jan 20, 2024 05:03 |
|
Tangy Zizzle posted:Also - has anyone been hurt by the attacks? I’d say getting kidnapped/held hostage would be harmful
|
# ¿ Jan 20, 2024 14:02 |
|
Tangy Zizzle posted:No ship crews have been hurt and anyone thinking about their own safety would be avoiding the area I would love to see a source for this. No reported deaths is a long ways away from no one hurt. Especially from the complete lack of updates regarding any hostages, AFAIK
|
# ¿ Jan 22, 2024 23:37 |
|
Tangy Zizzle posted:absence of evidence isn't evidence of absence and all that but I feel like if there had been any deaths it would have been bigger news You do understand there’s a difference between inflicting harm and inflicting death, right? You made a bold claim, I’m just asking for evidence of this claim
|
# ¿ Jan 22, 2024 23:42 |
|
A big flaming stink posted:Bruh I'm not sure what else to call ruling 15-2 and 16-1 on 4 orders Overwhelmingly agree with Joe Biden's opinion in the SA case for Palestine?
|
# ¿ Jan 26, 2024 15:38 |
|
A big flaming stink posted:like to comply with the order they need to cease all aggressive activities vs palestine This is the same thing that the US has been pushing as well. Hell, the ICJ haven't even ruled on if Israel is committing a genocide: https://www.wionews.com/world/watch-south-african-president-cyril-ramaphosa-breaks-into-celebration-as-icj-rules-against-israel-684014 I guess it's good to add additional pressure to Israel, but I don't see how this will change anything. Israel will just continue to say things such as "we thought those civilians were Hamas soldiers" and "we had to destroy Hamas infrastructure that they hid in civilian infrastructure".
|
# ¿ Jan 26, 2024 15:56 |
|
I'm confused by your claim of Neurolimal posted:South Africa won out on basically everything else; even the judge Israel provided ruled in favor. Wasn't the main (or entire) point of South Africa's case that Israel was committing genocide? Which the ICJ has not made a ruling on [yet?]. I'm trying to find the entire document that South Africa submitted to the ICJ in December, but having a hard time (if anyone has a link, I'd appreciate it!). However, numerous news articles I've read (e.g. https://www.theguardian.com/world/2023/dec/29/south-africa-accuses-israel-of-committing-genocide-in-gaza) seems to summarize it as "Israel are committing genocide, here are the reasons [...]". In addition for calling for an immediate ceasefire of course, which you already addressed*. Based on this, I'm confused on how South Africa "won out on basically everything else". *Although, TBH, I'm confused on your assumption on why ICJ wouldn't rule that. It's not unheard of for them to give a ceasefire/halt invasion rulings, such as the one they gave to Russia to stop their invasion a couple years ago.
|
# ¿ Jan 26, 2024 16:36 |
|
Dopilsya posted:Not exactly, this stage is basically the ICJ equivalent of saying South Africa's case survives a motion to dismiss and the provisional rulings are injunctions to prevent further irreparable harm until the merits of the case can be decided. Edit: which is to say South Africa won the day's argument pretty handily, but the relief sought wasn't entirely granted. Oh nice, thanks for the link! I'll read through it later. Although, I think I disagree that South Africa's motion not being dismissed and their request of an immediate ceasefire being denied as "they won", but ah well.
|
# ¿ Jan 26, 2024 17:00 |
|
Stringent posted:Well, there'd you'd be wrong. The ruling today was very much a victory for the Palestinian people. It's going to take time to bear fruit, but today was a victory for Palestine. I'm talking about this claim: Neurolimal posted:South Africa won out on basically everything else; even the judge Israel provided ruled in favor. This ICJ ruling is definitely better than nothing for Palestine. But it could have, and should have, been a more strict ruling that can't be easily followed by Israel by simply claiming stuff like: Kalit posted:"we thought those civilians were Hamas soldiers" and "we had to destroy Hamas infrastructure that they hid in civilian infrastructure".
|
# ¿ Jan 26, 2024 17:18 |
|
A big flaming stink posted:they cant simply proceed as they have been, those concerns are no excuse for committing actions that could result in genocide, thats why they have to report in a month about what they're doing to stop genocidal actions The report doesn't seem to be about what they've changed? The ICJ hasn't ruled that Israel has been committing genocidal actions, so I'm not sure why you're trying to claim that the report requires them to say what they're doing to stop genocidal actions. As far as what the report requires, as you noted above, it is: quote:82. Regarding the provisional measure requested by South Africa that Israel must submit a And the orders to follow specifically includes this: quote:The Court recalls that these acts fall within the scope of Article II of the Convention when they are committed with the intent to destroy in whole or in part a group as such (see paragraph 44 above) Which can easily be covered by claiming any Palestinian civilians killed were collateral damage. Or, at least my non-lawyer brain thinks that would still be following the ICJ orders. Kalit fucked around with this message at 17:33 on Jan 26, 2024 |
# ¿ Jan 26, 2024 17:31 |
|
A big flaming stink posted:They also have claimed to have rescued the crew on the ship after the extent of the damage became clear. As a small note, the Houthis didn't claim they rescued the crew, they just said quote:During the operation, we made sure that the ship’s crew exited safely The crew was rescued by MV Lobivia, after they had sent out a distress signal: https://www.standard.co.uk/news/politics/red-sea-ship-missile-drone-houthi-rubymar-yemen-iran-gaza-b1139969.html
|
# ¿ Feb 19, 2024 20:07 |
|
|
# ¿ May 12, 2024 16:35 |
|
Party In My Diapee posted:The Houthis have declared a blockade and every ship that doesn't go the long way around or surrender have decided to ignore that warning and put themselves at risk for no particular gain, other than profits for the companies and continued political support for Israel for the governments. Don't have to like the Houthis to be happy at least someone is doing what they can to protect Palestinians. We don't condemn Ukraine every time they cause civilian casualties This is 100% false. The Houthis themselves have stated over and over again that they're targeting specific ships and aren't going to expand that scope to all ships in the Red Sea. And, just to be clear to show that the Houthis aren't trying to do an entire blockade, there are lots of ships still passing through the Red Sea unhindered: https://www.marinevesseltraffic.com/RED-SEA/ship-traffic-tracker Kalit fucked around with this message at 01:58 on Feb 21, 2024 |
# ¿ Feb 21, 2024 01:56 |