Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
 
  • Locked thread
EmbryoSteve
Dec 18, 2004

Taste~The~Rainbow

My blood sugar is gon' be like

~^^^^*WHOA*^^^^~

AAAAA! Real Muenster posted:

I really hope the competition committee takes a look at it this offseason.

Nah, the touchback rule is fun and interesting and doesn't happen enough to warrant a big change imo; the chicago touchback would noto have even been called if they didnt challenge. I think we've seen a lot of touchbacks this year but overall I think it adds a bit more drama to the game. If you dont want to have a touchback dont fumble out the endzone.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

EmbryoSteve
Dec 18, 2004

Taste~The~Rainbow

My blood sugar is gon' be like

~^^^^*WHOA*^^^^~

Kalli posted:

It's really dumb for the defense to get the ball when they didn't do anything.

All this does is encourage players not to do suicide dives at the pylon... which own. So, change the rule.

Dunno, I generally think a fumble results from the defense doing something. It's not too often we just see a dude simply drop the ball. When a QB cant handle a snap and the defense recovers should the offense get the ball back since the defense didnt really do anything?

  • Locked thread