|
|
# ¿ Mar 2, 2018 05:36 |
|
|
# ¿ May 12, 2024 05:12 |
|
Starshark posted:I don't know much about international economics and the ABC article on this subject is annoying horseshit - what are the consequences for the US of Trump's tariffs on steel and aluminium? Domestically (USA) - Everything that has steel or aluminium in it just got more expensive to buy. Manufacturers in the US will suffer (eg) Car manufacturers will face the choice of passing on the cost and becoming even less competitive or being less profitable. America's most protected sector, agriculture, will face a hostile export market and require more subsidy. So in a single motion the US cost of living just went up significantly placing pressure on inflation while simultaneously depressing several key sectors of the economy severely and only lightly damaging all the rest. In most countries if you could do a single thing that would have the exact opposite effect people would be falling over themselves to achieve it and take the credit. Internationally - Lol. The biggest own goal in the entire history of globalisation. All of the subtle (but significant) stuff the US was trying to envoke in trade agreements to protect America's biggest commercial assets will be ignored or repudiated. Current trade deals can safely be torn up (The US just broke a bunch of them). New deals will be negotiated in an environment of the utmost hostility. This was the pie to the face with a complimentary bucket of white wash down the trousers all to protect a bunch of aging oligarchs who didn't invest in better production techniques when it would have mattered most. Steel production is 0.3% of US GDP and shrinking (Source https://www.statista.com/statistics/191961/value-added-by-us-primary-metal-manufacturing-as-a-percentage-of-gdp/) They are(were) THE BIGGEST importer of steel ( 26.9 million tonnes PA verses a domestic output of 6.7 million tonnes PA)
|
# ¿ Mar 3, 2018 00:41 |
|
I would blow Dane Cook posted:Caleb is horny and problematic
|
# ¿ Mar 3, 2018 12:32 |
|
adamantium|wang posted:Thanks goons
|
# ¿ Mar 4, 2018 08:32 |
|
Zenithe posted:Caleb wouldn't want to step on Bill Leak's toes.
|
# ¿ Mar 5, 2018 00:19 |
|
I would blow Dane Cook posted:TERFs are just mad they have to put up with their periods.
|
# ¿ Mar 5, 2018 01:44 |
|
Solemn Sloth posted:lol of course van badham supports ponies
|
# ¿ Mar 5, 2018 03:40 |
|
Dude McAwesome posted:I’m the parent cutting into her profit margins by charging her for transport and consumables.
|
# ¿ Mar 6, 2018 00:16 |
|
hiddenmovement posted:I have no idea why you guys don't just call the Ombudsman over this horseshit. The internet just dropping the gently caress out for days at a time is not acceptable in this day and age. CrazyTolradi posted:The TIO requires you to first attempt to resolve the issue with the ISP and go through their process before you can lodge a complaint with them. Which is all well and good right up to the point where the hideously under resourced TIO (Which is a private enterprise body NOT a statutory authority )doesn't even get to your complaint for a decade. https://www.tio.com.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0005/253643/2017_0929-TIO-Report-Final.pdf https://www.smh.com.au/business/small-business/small-business-complaints-to-telecommunications-industry-ombudsman-soar-20171017-gz2jzh.html J O K E
|
# ¿ Mar 6, 2018 04:31 |
|
And for a comedy pick me up: http://www.abc.net.au/radionational/programs/breakfast/laundy/9522114 quote:'Massive impact': Laundy issues warning over super union Wednesday 7 March 2018 7:37AM (view full episode) Best bit? Laundy denying that his policies are like those of Nazi Germany.
|
# ¿ Mar 7, 2018 03:06 |
|
Anidav posted:The father ends up being
|
# ¿ Mar 7, 2018 06:32 |
|
As commonwealth employees it is explicitly a crime under the Crimes Act 1914 (Part 6).
|
# ¿ Mar 8, 2018 05:48 |
|
Birdstrike posted:Disclosure of information by Commonwealth officers? quote:APS employees must be scrupulous in the use of Commonwealth resources, including money, credit cards, goods, services, vehicles, office equipment, official records (including electronic records) and telecommunications and information technology applications.
|
# ¿ Mar 8, 2018 09:38 |
|
froglet posted:Alternatively, convince every period-haver to free bleed everywhere, I imagine it'd quickly become an essential when men start having to see blood everywhere...
|
# ¿ Mar 9, 2018 01:23 |
|
Doctor Spaceman posted:Yeah, which is dumb because it leads to arbitrary decisions based on where food is cooked, or what particular healthcare/wellbeing products count as essential. Is this a really subtle comment on the realignment of jobs post feminism or furth evidence that you have to be struck by a hammer to the occipital lobe* to be a cartoonist these days. EDIT - 'Bad blood' hurf derp * Or provide medical evidence of a similar injury.
|
# ¿ Mar 9, 2018 01:56 |
|
Solemn Sloth posted:Galaxy brain gst is inherently regressive and thus anti feminist regardless of what exemptions apply
|
# ¿ Mar 9, 2018 04:30 |
|
GoldStandardConure posted:UM ITS CALLED MANGA NOT ANIME
|
# ¿ Mar 9, 2018 09:32 |
|
How do you get the gig torturing him? Asking for a friend.
|
# ¿ Mar 11, 2018 04:48 |
|
Birdstrike posted:ergo all my problems are caused by http://www.abc.net.au/radionational/programs/breakfast/us-north-korea-meeting-a-moment-of-truth/9538004 When did Micheal Kirby fall off a ladder and hit his head?
|
# ¿ Mar 12, 2018 00:38 |
|
Chadzok posted:The value is still there for people who can claim the franking credits to reduce tax burden, which labor is not removing. The cash refunds are only in the case of someone claiming a total income of less than $18k. This would be roughly $500K invested, give or take. If a couple was pulling this evil stunt between the two of them, they would have maximum combined share assets of roughly 1 million. Also:-
|
# ¿ Mar 13, 2018 01:03 |
|
Chadzok posted:bambi with a helmet I do not grok
|
# ¿ Mar 13, 2018 01:41 |
|
hooman posted:If Labor were serious about the budget deficit they'd roll back the howard era tax cuts.
|
# ¿ Mar 13, 2018 03:38 |
|
JBP posted:Including TISM. YOU TAKE THAT BACK MATE
|
# ¿ Mar 13, 2018 08:46 |
|
The main issue with the tax dividend snafu is that since it came in funds managers and investment advisers have been structuring financial matters to exploit it. As a result, with more and more people taking it up the budget cost is accelerating. It needs to be brought under control, and the sooner the better. Can't make an omelette without breaking eggs (etc.)
|
# ¿ Mar 15, 2018 06:42 |
|
I would blow Dane Cook posted:Greeks are white now? The Dutton South Africa furore is loving hilarious. First they came for the actual NAZIs.... CASE STUDY - [REDACTED] I would blow Dane Cook posted:Susan, Jane and James can blow me. Cartoon fucked around with this message at 00:25 on Mar 16, 2018 |
# ¿ Mar 16, 2018 00:22 |
|
Doctor Spaceman posted:If I was Labor I'd make sure I had a good answer for Susan's case study because it's the one I can see generating actual sympathy. tl;dr *WAH* I'm sitting on a huge sack of money please won't someone give me a hand out.
|
# ¿ Mar 16, 2018 00:33 |
|
Doctor Spaceman posted:I know the substance of the answer is "just draw down on it", and I don't disagree with it (or the policy). That's not my point. The real problem is that these arrangements have only been exploited since they were introduced. They are now being sold as tailored financial management products and are accelerating the effect on the structural budget deficit. They have to stop. It isn't really a choice at this point. And a final reiteration: When Susan sells the notional 3 or 4 grands worth of shares she is likely to make a significant capital gain. The whole "100K" invested boondoggle is a masterpiece in misleading. If I invested "100K" in a share portfolio that is providing me ~ 6% returns in dividends then it is 'worth' 106K at the end of the first year. This is only by standard accounting. Once you introduce the market side of things the shares that were worth 100K at the start of the year which have provided an EOFY dividend of 6K are probably 'worth' around 120K. You know how the ASX keeps going up? So maybe a better response to 'Susan' is: "Carping old rent seeker living on the public teat complains about the taste of her magic pudding." It really is that obviously egregious.
|
# ¿ Mar 16, 2018 02:12 |
|
I've been trying to put this to bed but if you are going to go after the ALP perhaps you should remember this:quote:On 1 July 2012, the tax-free threshold was raised from $6000 to $18200. https://www.humanservices.gov.au/individuals/enablers/tripling-tax-free-threshold Now before the ALP did that, even 'modest' 100K share portfolios would result in a taxable income. Which of the shiny giveaways do you want boomer poo poo smears?
|
# ¿ Mar 16, 2018 05:33 |
|
Zenithe posted:You used to be better than QLD Tokamak posted:Give me a bullet train, or give me death. http://www.abc.net.au/news/2018-03-18/sa-election-jay-weatherill-to-resign-as-labor-leader-after-loss/9560238 Weatherill (aka weather nothing) resigns. Of course Malformed Turdball takes this as a sign that coal is the future. quote:Meanwhile, Prime Minister Malcolm Turnbull claimed the Liberal Party's win was an endorsement of the federal government's energy policy. The prime minister spoke to incoming Mr Marshall this morning after his win ended 16 years of Labor government in the state. Mr Weatherill was the most vocal opponent of the federal government's National Energy Guarantee, Mr Turnbull said. "Jay Weatherill said this was a referendum on energy policy," he said. "The people have spoken and spoken in favour of our policies which is to support affordable and reliable energy to ensure that we can meet our Paris commitment, and at the same time ensure that we can keep the lights on and indeed afford to keep the lights on." Thanks SA we really needed a self destructive short sighted energy policy in this country.
|
# ¿ Mar 18, 2018 02:29 |
|
But what does this mean for Kevin Rudd's leadership ambitions?
|
# ¿ Mar 19, 2018 04:41 |
|
If I'm Turdball Anidav is definitely NTATA.
|
# ¿ Mar 19, 2018 09:48 |
|
Gorilla Salad posted:As deeply evil as Pell is, even he couldn't be so arrogant as to think he'd walk away from all this without a scratch? The Peccadillo posted:Some awful mod bastard: let's chase out and exclude a mentally ill goatherd who posts like a prophet, that person doesn't rule at all quote:Type Date Horrible Jerk Punishment Reason Requested By Approved By a man of vision posted:after years of dedication to my craft i transcended the old probation/ban system and became a being of pure energy that can only be stopped by the most powerful weapon available to the admin team. in fact if i stopped threatening to kill the president they'd probably stop banning me, but unfortunately that was the mission i was put on the green earth to carry out and i won't let it be stifled by a gaggle of unpaid computer men
|
# ¿ Mar 20, 2018 00:52 |
|
norp posted:The peak buyers will hold out as long as they can for the old rents, but that can only go on for so long until they are forced to sell or accept a loss.
|
# ¿ Mar 21, 2018 00:22 |
|
I don't have that short of a memory.
|
# ¿ Mar 21, 2018 04:36 |
|
Hollandia posted:Just found out the union most likely to cover me is the QLD CPSU - before I contact them to join, are they secret Tories or anything?
|
# ¿ Mar 21, 2018 08:37 |
|
Dimebag posted:Oh look forward to sniffer dogs everywhere just like here in NSW. That's seems to be the LNP war on drugs policy, spend a shitload for very little positive effect. Unless that effect is funneling money to their donors.
|
# ¿ Mar 22, 2018 00:28 |
|
Look the only humane way to solve the white refugee crisis in South Afrika is to disrupt the people smuggler's business model. Also does this count as a an Amethyst melt down? It's been a while and I forget what the gold standard was. P.S. Arguing against open borders by citing Israel is loving hilarious.
|
# ¿ Mar 22, 2018 04:13 |
|
Amethyst posted:And yet no one here has mustered an argument against the notion. If you can't bring yourself to put the slightest effort into defense of the manifestly absurd idea of near-future open border immigration it may be a sign that you don't actually believe in it.
|
# ¿ Mar 22, 2018 04:35 |
|
BBJoey posted:i mean the point seems pretty straightforward; the british opening the borders of the mandate of palestine to all jews resulted in an influx of jewish immigrants and subsequent disenfranchisement and displacement of the palestinian population 1/Amythest 2/A mono culture being relocated into another mono culture has zero correspondence to any actual open or multicultural situation. 3/The whole phrase 'open border' is meaningless until defined in some way. The actual existence of any border that was 100% open is effectively vanishingly small in comparison to all other situations. The best example I can think of is colonialism (eg) Terra Nullis. Even then, once the Brits raised the flag they weren't keen on the Dutch or the French participating.
|
# ¿ Mar 22, 2018 06:35 |
|
|
# ¿ May 12, 2024 05:12 |
|
hiddenmovement posted:I agree lets turn this into the foodie thread gay picnic defence posted:Even though the costs of warehousing and distribution should be coming down due to better warehousing and stock management software the one's I'm familiar with are very unwilling to decrease their margins. I think the end game is for the distributors to turn themselves into large online stores that bypass the retail outlets altogether.
|
# ¿ Mar 24, 2018 00:40 |