|
The second screenshotted tweet isn't true. Clinton emails had been targeted prior to that night, just not the accounts specifically referred to in that section of the indictment.
|
#
¿
Jul 14, 2018 19:32
|
|
|
|
| # ¿ May 21, 2024 12:30 |
|
|
SKULL.GIF posted:The specific text of the indictment says this: https://twitter.com/awprokop/status/1017814786418073601
|
|
#
¿
Jul 14, 2018 19:36
|
|
|
Main Paineframe posted:in mid-February 2016 she had an event at Flint iirc Shattered claimed that when Clinton lost the Michigan and Wisconsin primaries she learned that visiting states was useless and in fact hurt her popularity in those states. Now, if I was running for president and I found that visiting a place made the people there less likely to vote for me, I might reconsider running for elected office, but I guess that's why she needed the sycophant squad to talk her out of quitting.
|
|
#
¿
Jul 28, 2018 20:25
|
|
|
Ave moderator, morituri te salutant.
|
|
#
¿
Aug 11, 2018 18:43
|
|
|
Every four years, HRC will write an addendum to What Happened, embarking on another book and media tour. When she dies Chelsea will take up the task. By 2058, the book will be a thousand pages long.
|
|
#
¿
Sep 18, 2018 22:27
|
|
|
Feldegast42 posted:Lol love that the succdem solution to immigration basically amounts to indentured servitude Is this the same guy that wrote the pro-slavery article in Politico last year? That was a highlight bad take. edit: It is!!! Keep on keeping on, guy. pospysyl fucked around with this message at 20:52 on Sep 19, 2018 |
|
#
¿
Sep 19, 2018 20:50
|
|
|
Zoran posted:if you’ve got a majority willing to install a tenth judge then you’ve got a majority willing to switch the rules back Actually, it takes a two thirds majority to remove a justice. When Congress reduced the size of the court to 7 during the Johnson administration, it only fell to 7 when individual justices retired; they weren't removed.
|
|
#
¿
Oct 2, 2018 23:35
|
|
|
Zoran posted:this is completely correct but also has nothing to do with packing the courts It means they're easy to pack, difficult to unpack. Were the Republicans to do a Johnson administration style court unpacking, their guys would be the first one to leave. Of course, nothing's stopping them from adding more judges to the Supreme Court, but there's only so much room in the Supreme Court hall.
|
|
#
¿
Oct 3, 2018 01:58
|
|
|
The Muppets On PCP posted:all the d&d libs defending warren because this was supposedly aimed at getting jake tapper et al to hop on board against trump's bullying White people, libs and cons, get so mad and defensive when you tell them that having distant native ancestry doesn't actually make you part Indian.
|
|
#
¿
Oct 16, 2018 00:11
|
|
|
Tars Tarkas posted:lanyard crew roasted by the Daily Dot of all places Extremely good article, not least because it includes the following image: 
|
|
#
¿
Oct 17, 2018 17:13
|
|
|
galenanorth posted:https://twitter.com/sheabrian/status/1057621800341958657 Imagine reading a political platform and just believing it uncritically.
|
|
#
¿
Oct 31, 2018 19:15
|
|
|
Ytlaya posted:I think that most people are gullible in the same way as that guy. I know that I was when Obama was running in 2008. Your average voter is going to assume that when Democrats say "I'm concerned about inequality and climate change" that there's an implied "and thus I'm going to do something to fix it." And if you show skepticism, they'll just perceive you as being overly negative/cynical. It's less that people are gullible and more that they're information illiterate. Most people who are inclined to research a politician only know how to google the person's name and find their website. The platform is really all they have to go on. Of course, most people aren't even inclined to do research at all.
|
|
#
¿
Oct 31, 2018 21:00
|
|
|
|
| # ¿ May 21, 2024 12:30 |
|
|
Turns out sweeping electoral changes don't happen without an economic crisis!
|
|
#
¿
Nov 7, 2018 03:28
|
|