Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
 
  • Post
  • Reply
Sanguinia
Jan 1, 2012

~Everybody wants to be a cat~
~Because a cat's the only cat~
~Who knows where its at~

Teddybear posted:

This feels like an unusual amount of retracted/blown calls for an election-- both in that it's several media companies making the same mistakes, and that there's been so many of them. I don't remember these sorts of slipups happening in 2016 or before-- am I wrong?

There hasn't been a midterm race with this kind of turnout in 100 years, their models didn't account for that. They used the best information they had.

(Nate's model ended up being almost perfect. His predictions were never far from Sen R - 0 to R+2 or House D - 35 to D - 40)

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

PhazonLink
Jul 17, 2010
turns out the 24 hour news cycle biz model of getting the fastest hottest fastest take is very very stupid.

Maybe they should just literally report "yup the passage of time still works and the polls closed, final results in several hours for boring places, FL results in a week."

OddObserver
Apr 3, 2009

Sanguinia posted:

There hasn't been a midterm race with this kind of turnout in 100 years, their models didn't account for that. They used the best information they had.

(Nate's model ended up being almost perfect. His predictions were never far from Sen R - 0 to R+2 or House D - 35 to D - 40)

Also there is growth of early voting/vote by mail, which is generally much slower to count, and may be demographically different from election-day voting.

mistaya
Oct 18, 2006

Cat of Wealth and Taste

The calling of races on election night really needs to be moderated somehow, mainly because calls to violence over races called too soon are now a thing thanks to our ghoul of a President and his ghoul of a party. I don't know if our news organizations are capable of figuring that one out though. :(

Like sure, call races where "The total number of absentee ballots cannot exceed the current lead" but that's it.

Deteriorata
Feb 6, 2005

mistaya posted:

The calling of races on election night really needs to be moderated somehow, mainly because calls to violence over races called too soon are now a thing thanks to our ghoul of a President and his ghoul of a party. I don't know if our news organizations are capable of figuring that one out though. :(

Like sure, call races where "The total number of absentee ballots cannot exceed the current lead" but that's it.

There's a small problem of the 1st amendment in terms of actual regulation of this. It all has to be internal self-regulation.

The problem is that there is more reward for calling races first than calling them right when the reversals come days later.

Lightning Knight
Feb 24, 2012

Pray for Answer

mistaya posted:

The calling of races on election night really needs to be moderated somehow, mainly because calls to violence over races called too soon are now a thing thanks to our ghoul of a President and his ghoul of a party. I don't know if our news organizations are capable of figuring that one out though. :(

Like sure, call races where "The total number of absentee ballots cannot exceed the current lead" but that's it.

Arguably the entire practice of calling races the night of the election, and not waiting for some kind of official call from the people actually counting the votes, is itself remarkably stupid and hosed up.

Charlz Guybon
Nov 16, 2010
After the networks blew the call on Florida in 2000 they pulled back and waited longer for several cylces, but with the passage of time the buissness pressure to be first to call has overcame that caution.

PhazonLink
Jul 17, 2010

Deteriorata posted:

There's a small problem of the 1st amendment in terms of actual regulation of this. It all has to be internal self-regulation.

The problem is that there is more reward for calling races first than calling them right when the reversals come days later.

Or it has to be consumer driven.

Or maybe our understanding of the 1st amendment should evolve and we need to confront some uncomfortable truths for the greater good.

Sanguinia
Jan 1, 2012

~Everybody wants to be a cat~
~Because a cat's the only cat~
~Who knows where its at~

On the topic of uncalled races, here's what I was able to find in a few minutes of blind googling looking only for updates from the last 24 Hours. These are races that have not yet been decided according to the New York Times House Elections Results list.

New York 22nd:

BALLOTS HAVE BEEN IMPOUNDED IN THE 22ND CONGRESSIONAL DISTRICT RACE

Utah 4th:

Gehrke: Latest election results break Love’s way and so we wait for a call in the 4th District

Main 2nd:

Secretary of State defends election integrity amid concerns from Maine GOP

Georgia 7th:

Democrat Bourdeaux takes legal action as 7th District race remains unresolved

Texas 23rd:

https://twitter.com/jbendery/status/1061666887627628544?ref_src=twsrc%5Egoogle%7Ctwcamp%5Enews%7Ctwgr%5Etweet

I was unable to find updates from the last 24 Hours concerning the California 10th, 39th and 45th, the New Jersey 3rd, or the New York 27th. However, local news outlets did call the New York 27th for Actually Indited Criminal Chris Collins (R) and have not since retracted.

OddObserver
Apr 3, 2009
I doubt NY-27 will change since NY has pretty restrictive absentee rules.

knox_harrington
Feb 18, 2011

Running no point.

https://mobile.twitter.com/NatashaBertrand/status/1061790562116952064

Slow News Day
Jul 4, 2007


After Trump publicly distanced himself from him, it's doubtful Whitaker will still be around by January.

Vincent Van Goatse
Nov 8, 2006

Enjoy every sandwich.

Smellrose

enraged_camel posted:

After Trump publicly distanced himself from him, it's doubtful Whitaker will still be around by January.

He'll still get subpoenaed.

Slow News Day
Jul 4, 2007

Vincent Van Goatse posted:

He'll still get subpoenaed.

For what? They want to interrogate him and force him to recuse himself from the Russia stuff. If he is no longer acting AG by then, what would be the point of a subpoena?

knox_harrington
Feb 18, 2011

Running no point.

I had heard about Arnie's anti gerrymandering campaign but didn't realise it went beyond California. Independent redistricting seems like a very good idea, depending on how it's implemented of course.

https://mobile.twitter.com/kylegriffin1/status/1061815848258613248

Condiv
May 7, 2008

Sorry to undo the effort of paying a domestic abuser $10 to own this poster, but I am going to lose my dang mind if I keep seeing multiple posters who appear to be Baloogan.

With love,
a mod


this isn't from a news outlet, but I think it's worthwhile enough to post here

https://twitter.com/LA_SocialistRA/status/1061663031904501760

knox_harrington
Feb 18, 2011

Running no point.

Condiv posted:

this isn't from a news outlet, but I think it's worthwhile enough to post here

https://twitter.com/LA_SocialistRA/status/1061663031904501760

Christ. Surely that can't be real. "I understand your house is on fire but you have to come in to work"

Skippy McPants
Mar 19, 2009

knox_harrington posted:

I had heard about Arnie's anti gerrymandering campaign but didn't realise it went beyond California. Independent redistricting seems like a very good idea, depending on how it's implemented of course.

https://mobile.twitter.com/kylegriffin1/status/1061815848258613248

He was a poo poo governor, but he still has a lot of popular caché and if he commits the rest of his public life to the termination of gerrymandering then I'm all for it.

knox_harrington posted:

Christ. Surely that can't be real. "I understand your house is on fire but you have to come in to work"

poo poo like this is totally real. Low-level managers have to beg, plead, and threaten to wrangle a full staff at even the best of times. If they can't, then they're the ones stuck working the unfilled shifts— often without the benefit of overtime, because they count as "management" and are paid a salary even if they work 60-hours in a week and take home less than the hourly employees would in the same time.

Yay capitalism!

Skippy McPants fucked around with this message at 11:30 on Nov 12, 2018

Captain Invictus
Apr 5, 2005

Try reading some manga!


Clever Betty

knox_harrington posted:

Christ. Surely that can't be real. "I understand your house is on fire but you have to come in to work"
when my grandma died they were like "oK so you need a day off?"

Corporate stooges are sociopaths

Hellblazer187
Oct 12, 2003

On the subject of early calls gone wrong, yes it's happened before. We can ask president Dewey all about it.

On the subject of PR folk to Polk county: not all of PR is urban. Iirc, the rural areas have been slowest to recover, so it would make sense to see movent to other rural zones.

Tibalt
May 14, 2017

What, drawn, and talk of peace! I hate the word, As I hate hell, all Montagues, and thee

enraged_camel posted:

For what? They want to interrogate him and force him to recuse himself from the Russia stuff. If he is no longer acting AG by then, what would be the point of a subpoena?
Well, potentially, he could testify under oath that Trump ordered him to kill or hamper the Mueller investigation.

knox_harrington
Feb 18, 2011

Running no point.

Donald getting dissed by the French Army

https://mobile.twitter.com/armeedeterre/status/1061908742999027712

theCalamity
Oct 23, 2010

Cry Havoc and let slip the Hogs of War
https://twitter.com/bopinion/status/1061376714931167232?s=21

tetrapyloctomy
Feb 18, 2003

Okay -- you talk WAY too fast.
Nap Ghost

Tibalt posted:

Well, potentially, he could testify under oath that Trump ordered him to kill or hamper the Mueller investigation.

I suspect that Democrats now controlling the House also want to make as many people in the executive branch miserable, and to use the constant threat of being pulled into an investigation to dissuade people from taking positions. It'll be a tightrope walk: too few subpoenas and progressives will be pissed, and too many will rile up and mobilize the regressive base rather than demoralize them.

I wonder how long he'll be able to keep his mouth shut if the ridicule keeps up.

Doctor Spaceman
Jul 6, 2010

"Everyone's entitled to their point of view, but that's seriously a weird one."
https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/1061962869376540672

Barry Foster
Dec 24, 2007

What is going wrong with that one (face is longer than it should be)

I'd say it's working exactly as intended

knox_harrington
Feb 18, 2011

Running no point.


Apart from this clearly being not written by Donald, I feel like there has been a shift further into conspiracy theory territory in his missives recently

paternity suitor
Aug 2, 2016

Thank you for this thread PPJ!

Condiv
May 7, 2008

Sorry to undo the effort of paying a domestic abuser $10 to own this poster, but I am going to lose my dang mind if I keep seeing multiple posters who appear to be Baloogan.

With love,
a mod



death to capitalism


a translation for anyone interested:

"It's raining, but it's no big deal. We stay motivated."

Chilichimp
Oct 24, 2006

TIE Adv xWampa

It wamp, and it stomp

Grimey Drawer

Charlz Guybon posted:

After the networks blew the call on Florida in 2000 they pulled back and waited longer for several cylces, but with the passage of time the buissness pressure to be first to call has overcame that caution.

I do not understand the concept of being "first to call" and why that should matter to news organizations. It definitely seems to run counter to basic journalistic practices to just guess who's going to win based on publicly available information, instead of just waiting.

Like... if they really wanted to make this a spectacle, they could treat close races and absentee ballots like OT. Announces who is ahead and by how many votes once the precincts are 100% reported, then if it's close, they send that race into their OT coverage where they just talk about the process of counting absentee ballots, set up a horse-race graphic that shows the gap needing to be closed, and take the time to educate the public on poo poo like recount laws in that district/state.

Chilichimp
Oct 24, 2006

TIE Adv xWampa

It wamp, and it stomp

Grimey Drawer

enraged_camel posted:

For what? They want to interrogate him and force him to recuse himself from the Russia stuff. If he is no longer acting AG by then, what would be the point of a subpoena?

It's important for America to know some poo poo about whitaker, and off the top of my head:

"How did your name come to be on a list of people who were eligible to be acting attorney general?"
"Were you aware you didn't meet the qualifications for this role under the vacancies act?"
"Why did you immediately assume control over the Mueller probe when you have a very public history of being critical of it?"
"What actions did you take while in control of the OSC?"

I'd also call Rod Rosenstein to ask him how the process of him being removed from OSC oversight went.

evilweasel
Aug 24, 2002

Chilichimp posted:

I do not understand the concept of being "first to call" and why that should matter to news organizations. It definitely seems to run counter to basic journalistic practices to just guess who's going to win based on publicly available information, instead of just waiting.

Like... if they really wanted to make this a spectacle, they could treat close races and absentee ballots like OT. Announces who is ahead and by how many votes once the precincts are 100% reported, then if it's close, they send that race into their OT coverage where they just talk about the process of counting absentee ballots, set up a horse-race graphic that shows the gap needing to be closed, and take the time to educate the public on poo poo like recount laws in that district/state.

Most people just want to know who won and if they hear ABC is calling races while CBS isn't yet, they'll switch over to ABC to find out who won faster, giving ABC higher ratings and therefore more money.

Tibalt
May 14, 2017

What, drawn, and talk of peace! I hate the word, As I hate hell, all Montagues, and thee

It also isn't particularly hard to call most races. I think if you crunched the numbers, my gut feeling is that most elections have similar number of late switches. It's just that this election is particularly important at the margins, why most elections your average voter doesn't care if the Democrats won 5 seats versus 10 seats.

Charlz Guybon
Nov 16, 2010

His candidates are 99% likely to win the recount, because that's what happens in recounts. Why say this?

If he wasn't such an ignorant, whiny baby, I'd take this as an indication that he knows something we don't and that maybe it really was a machine error in Broward that caused the under count. But one should never assume Trump knows something, he's just a dick.

Chilichimp
Oct 24, 2006

TIE Adv xWampa

It wamp, and it stomp

Grimey Drawer

evilweasel posted:

Most people just want to know who won and if they hear ABC is calling races while CBS isn't yet, they'll switch over to ABC to find out who won faster, giving ABC higher ratings and therefore more money.

right, but then you get Election OT coverage for days and days. No one is doing that, so someone do it and nobody will watch anything else.

Just get Jerry "the King" Lawler as the color commentator.

Owlofcreamcheese
May 22, 2005
Probation
Can't post for 9 years!
Buglord
I am sure even if the news didn't call any races people would still act like they did. Like if day one they only said "with 75% of the precincts reporting XYZ has a lead of 70 to 30" people would take that as "XYZ won" even if that absolutely doesn't say that. I think even if the news restated frequently it didn't mean that people would still do the "yeah, but it means that"

Koalas March
May 21, 2007



Ok...

https://twitter.com/politico/status/1061985740425433088?s=19

I take it back, in no way do you "gotta hand it" to Kellyanne

https://twitter.com/thehill/status/1061985229823508481?s=19

marshmonkey
Dec 5, 2003

I was sick of looking
at your stupid avatar
so
have a cool cat instead.

:v:
Switchblade Switcharoo
https://mobile.twitter.com/peterbakernyt/status/1061935455153909760

FlamingLiberal
Jan 18, 2009

Would you like to play a game?



Our country is run by morons.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

marshmonkey
Dec 5, 2003

I was sick of looking
at your stupid avatar
so
have a cool cat instead.

:v:
Switchblade Switcharoo
https://mobile.twitter.com/nprpolitics/status/1061922984116445184

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • Post
  • Reply