|
TheBizzness posted:I watched Green Book last night. Now watch Battle Angel Alita.
|
# ? Apr 2, 2019 06:19 |
|
|
# ? May 3, 2024 05:07 |
|
The_Doctor posted:Now watch Battle Angel Alita. No problem. Jennifer Connelly is in it.
|
# ? Apr 2, 2019 06:25 |
|
The_Doctor posted:Now watch Battle Angel Alita.
|
# ? Apr 2, 2019 08:58 |
|
Finished watching the full series over like two months. Gonna be contrarian here, I think my ranking would be 2 > 1 > 3. S3 was still excellent, but it just felt dragged out. They could have easily told the whole story in five or six episodes.
|
# ? Apr 3, 2019 15:20 |
|
yikes.
|
# ? Apr 3, 2019 15:45 |
|
His post gave me blue balls of the brain.
|
# ? Apr 4, 2019 03:29 |
|
My extremely hot take is 3 > 2 > 1
|
# ? Apr 4, 2019 10:26 |
|
What is even happening
|
# ? Apr 4, 2019 13:09 |
|
Milo and POTUS posted:What is even happening Time is a flat circle, it’s happening, did happen and will happen all at once and separately
|
# ? Apr 4, 2019 13:21 |
|
precision posted:My extremely hot take is 3 > 2 > 1 you ask me, the dark's winning
|
# ? Apr 4, 2019 13:28 |
|
precision posted:My extremely hot take is 3 > 2 > 1 i'm projectile vomiting.
|
# ? Apr 4, 2019 16:43 |
|
If you think about it, 2 is the only actually good season of TD.
|
# ? Apr 4, 2019 17:17 |
|
Because season 1 was great and season 3 was very good? I guess that makes sense.
|
# ? Apr 4, 2019 17:26 |
|
Season 3 sucked. I didn't know so many people liked watching paint dry.
|
# ? Apr 4, 2019 18:33 |
|
imo the only indefensible opinion is 2 > 1 > 3 Pretty sure that's an automatic Section 8 right there
|
# ? Apr 4, 2019 18:50 |
|
Doltos posted:Season 3 sucked. I didn't know so many people liked watching paint dry. Ali and Dourff killed it, so I enjoyed watching it though I do agree the story was lacking.
|
# ? Apr 4, 2019 19:10 |
|
Season 2 was so different that whatever, if you liked it more than the others so be it, you enjoy what you enjoy. Season 3> Season 1 is just madness though. Insanity
|
# ? Apr 4, 2019 19:52 |
|
Basebf555 posted:Season 2 was so different that whatever, if you liked it more than the others so be it, you enjoy what you enjoy. Madness? No... This...is... SOMETHING AWFUL
|
# ? Apr 4, 2019 20:17 |
|
precision posted:imo the only indefensible opinion is 2 > 1 > 3 lol It's pretty much based on how much interesting stuff actually happened during the season, as all three had good characters/actors, and they all got in the mandatory share of brooding noir moments.
|
# ? Apr 4, 2019 20:48 |
|
Frankly, I'm apoplectic.
Shrimp or Shrimps fucked around with this message at 06:40 on Apr 6, 2019 |
# ? Apr 6, 2019 06:37 |
|
I wonder if Season 2 was the first season if it would’ve been remembered more fondly.
|
# ? Apr 6, 2019 12:53 |
|
I wonder if there would have been a season 2.
|
# ? Apr 6, 2019 22:18 |
|
TheBizzness posted:I wonder if there would have been a season 2. Very unlikely, unless HBO was feeling generous.
|
# ? Apr 6, 2019 23:16 |
|
TheBizzness posted:I wonder if there would have been a season 2. Remember John From Cincinatti? Good times, good times (but not really).
|
# ? Apr 7, 2019 01:03 |
|
John From Cincinnati was awesome
|
# ? Apr 7, 2019 01:20 |
|
I came here to semi-resurrect the threat for a particular reason, but I have to detour in case other people haven't taken care of an issue I saw some pages back. (Apologies if someone covered this already, but I'm not reading every last post.) Some people apparently thought James Harris killed Dan the awful cousin. I'll try not to be rude about this but, uh, no, I think not. Tom Purcell killed Dan then James killed Tom. Tom told Dan to give him a reason not to murder him, then off-camera Dan clearly said the word Hoyt then Tom roughly as clearly went ahead and murdered Dan anyway. He didn't seem to be in a forgiving mood, especially what any parent would have thought about the hole in the wall. Motive, means, and opportunity right there. It's not clear if the people acting for Hoyt (or more likely in his name, see below) even knew if Dan was back, but if they did they failed to track him down when poor, pathetic Tom Purcell easily did. That's even not the best reason it had to be Tom. It's the theme. The theme of this season is how un-planning, un-powerful, and even un-evil the Big Evil Villains are. James wasn't the mastermind, and he killed, I think, just one person. Not only was it not James, it also wasn't Hoyt, who wasn't lying about being in the dark (though to some extent that was willfully in the dark after the fact). It was Junius, who got to be the mastermind by actually being (not pretending!) a servile black man with quite likely no formal education. (Remember, he had that power because Hoyt left him in charge of his household then went off to safaris or whatever.) Irony doesn't have to be regarded as a virtue in writing, but it's heavily pushed and I think well pulled off here. The ending of episode 7 sells Hoyt as a menacing honest-to-God Dr. Claw rip-off, then he turns out to be a 75% clueless, pathetic drunk, quite like much of the rest of the cast. Actual mastermind Junius hits the pathetically tragic button too of course, especially in that great moment when he tips his hand he's acquired a great education in psychology--albeit far too late--by saying "break," instead of "breakdown." Anyway, I came here looking for people's thoughts on what the very last scene (jungle flashback) meant. I don't mean anything plot-related, because I don't think it meant anything to the plot. I took it as at least showing how Hays (or Haze, since this is a show that basically names the darkest most broken down character Rust Coal) ends up trapped in his own palace of memory, constantly pulled back to the worst. Maybe something about how he's drawn back to memories of tracking, pursuing something it's not in his interest or really his fight to find. Most importantly I feel like I'm missing something important (symbolism-wise, not plot-wise) with the last scene.
|
# ? Apr 12, 2019 03:06 |
|
I felt the last scene was him disappearing into his own mind for what would probably be a lengthy period of dementia. Just like back in 'Nam, where as far as everybody else was concerned his recon patrols were him disappearing into the jungle and not appearing again for days or weeks. His moments of lucidity are going to be fewer and further between. There's a scene earlier in the season where shadowy Vietcong figures surround him while he's desperately trying to keep everything together so he can work his way through the case, and spotting the car outside causes them to leave because it engages his mind enough that he comes back to clarity. By the last scene, even the shot of the kids racing down the street having fun in an obvious parallel to the Purcell kids aren't enough to stop him from disappearing into the dark again in his own mind. That's my take, anyway. Good season, it didn't really hit any highs but it didn't hit any real lows either, it just retained a pretty strong quality throughout aided by some great performances by Ali and Dorff (the latter I never knew had it in him).
|
# ? Apr 12, 2019 07:04 |
|
Onomarchus posted:I came here to semi-resurrect the threat for a particular reason, but I have to detour in case other people haven't taken care of an issue I saw some pages back. (Apologies if someone covered this already, but I'm not reading every last post.) Some people apparently thought James Harris killed Dan the awful cousin. I'll try not to be rude about this but, uh, no, I think not. Tom Purcell killed Dan then James killed Tom. Tom told Dan to give him a reason not to murder him, then off-camera Dan clearly said the word Hoyt then Tom roughly as clearly went ahead and murdered Dan anyway. He didn't seem to be in a forgiving mood, especially what any parent would have thought about the hole in the wall. Motive, means, and opportunity right there. Wasn’t the cousin’s body found in a flooded quarry? It seems pretty likely that James killed him and disposed of the body, perhaps first learning from him that Scoot was on the way, as the door to the apartment was open.
|
# ? Apr 12, 2019 09:46 |
|
I just finished season 3 and I'm having a difficult time trying to decide if I liked it better than season 1. I really enjoyed both. I think I gave up on Season 2 on like the second episode. Not because I didn't enjoy it, I didn't really give it a fair shake. I think I might go back and try to give it a full watch through.
|
# ? Apr 13, 2019 01:55 |
|
Ali & Dorff are better actors than Matt and Woody
|
# ? Apr 20, 2019 14:12 |
|
They’re all pretty great, why you trying to start trouble? Ali is probably the best of the lot though, and that’s coming from someone who loves Matty Mac to a ridiculous degree.
|
# ? Apr 20, 2019 15:07 |
|
Bust Rodd posted:Ali & Dorff are better actors than Matt and Woody Exponentially better, even
|
# ? Apr 20, 2019 15:18 |
|
I’m not trying to start trouble I just think it’s one thing I can say is that S3 has better leads who are genuinely more likable than Rust & Marty I liked this season fine but it lacked the gripping and provocative imagery of S1 that really sold it for me. A bunch of slow shots of dilapidated country town houses doesn’t fill me with the same existential dread as swamplands and antlers. I liked the ending. Amelia was a great character and a strong woman and I found her really challenging to enjoy but really liked her role in the show. All the dogs are very good. I think I’m gonna watch S2 now that I have the good seasons wrapped up. Just because i like Vince Vaughn (or I used to anyway)
|
# ? Apr 20, 2019 15:19 |
|
Onomarchus posted:I came here to semi-resurrect the threat for a particular reason, but I have to detour in case other people haven't taken care of an issue I saw some pages back. (Apologies if someone covered this already, but I'm not reading every last post.) Some people apparently thought James Harris killed Dan the awful cousin. I'll try not to be rude about this but, uh, no, I think not. Tom Purcell killed Dan then James killed Tom. Tom told Dan to give him a reason not to murder him, then off-camera Dan clearly said the word Hoyt then Tom roughly as clearly went ahead and murdered Dan anyway. He didn't seem to be in a forgiving mood, especially what any parent would have thought about the hole in the wall. Motive, means, and opportunity right there. Wasn't Dan's body found in, like, another state entirely, in a flooded quarry, at that? It seems unlikely that Tom would've taken the time to transport Dan/Dan's body across state lines, carefully disposing of it in a time-intensive and careful manner...THEN gone to the Hoyt mansion while dressed in the same clothes he'd had when confronting Dan and clearly in a fairly manic and impatient state? Seems more likely that Tom got the info, went straight to the Hoyt mansion, James took care of him, then went and found Dan (who was likely too concussed and beaten-up to be ready to go anywhere too fast, thus still at the motel), and took care of him, too. Given that they seemed to be monitoring the detectives' movements, including their run-in with Dan, he would've probably already been on their radar when Tom suddenly showed up, getting at him wouldn't be too tough/a logical leap for an ex-detective like James.
|
# ? Apr 21, 2019 05:40 |
|
I vote for Tom hardy and Channing Tatum for season 4.
|
# ? Apr 27, 2019 01:53 |
|
MarcusSA posted:I vote for Tom hardy and Channing Tatum for season 4. Alternately, Terry O'Quinn and Christopher Meloni
|
# ? Apr 27, 2019 02:30 |
|
Tom Hardy would be incredible.
|
# ? Apr 27, 2019 02:41 |
|
Taraji Henson & Tom Hardy would be my dream team
|
# ? Apr 27, 2019 04:16 |
|
Morgan Freeman
|
# ? May 24, 2019 20:30 |
|
|
# ? May 3, 2024 05:07 |
|
Morgan Freeman and Samuel L. Jackson in the deep south busting up Klan rings involved in the supernatural.
|
# ? May 24, 2019 23:44 |