Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
 
  • Post
  • Reply
Pilfered Pallbearers
Aug 2, 2007

SlothfulCobra posted:

He's so weirdly negative about food.

It really fits the “angry man rants at you for 30 minutes” shtick

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Pilfered Pallbearers
Aug 2, 2007

Azhais posted:

The current talk I hear is keeping it on full time, which I'm not entirely sure how that's different than removing it

Other than being stupid vs the rest of the world, which I suppose is the American way

Removing it means it’s perpetually dark an hour earlier.

Keeping it means it’s perpetually dark an hour later.

Pretty sure most people prefer an extra hour of daylight at 6pm rather than at 5am.

Pilfered Pallbearers
Aug 2, 2007

This show is at its apex when it does real world stunts that shows how stupid and evil people really are.

Or gags that go further than any reasonable person ever would (Chi-John comes to
Mind).

Pilfered Pallbearers
Aug 2, 2007

Orange Devil posted:


Biden does the exact same thing and we're all suddenly supposed to take it seriously. Like the problem with Trump's racism was that it was gauche, not that it was racist. Lmao.

This is the stupidest thing I’ve seen in a very long time.

There is a very deep, significant difference between

“We’ve heard credible information that there may have been some kind of lab related issue, and we are going to look into if there is any truth there”

And

“The virus came from China! It’s chinas fault you’re all dying! China China China. They will pay for all of your suffering. We need to smack them down. China.

China. “

This is the same both sides-ism argument that gets thrown around by people without the ability to critically think, or that are purposely arguing in bad faith due to racism, xenophobia, et al.

Pilfered Pallbearers
Aug 2, 2007

sexpig by night posted:

'may we see the credible information?'

'no. Also if we don't find anything China clearly destroyed the proof'

Again, strawman bullshit.

Credible information does not equal true information.

They’re not announcing the start of a loving war. Then it’s valid to demand details (a la bush/Iraq).

But they’re launching an investigation. You don’t put out a bunch of potentially false information, you say you’re verifying and will come back with more info.

Learn some god drat critical thinking skills. Not everything is a loving conspiracy.

Pilfered Pallbearers
Aug 2, 2007

Macdeo Lurjtux posted:

The judge has accepted the Sackler bankruptcy deal and given the family full immunity from future lawsuits.

The state of Connecticut is appealing the decision.

Pilfered Pallbearers
Aug 2, 2007

sexpig by night posted:

Jesus that episode was such classic Last Week Tonight, a fairly good deep dive into the history of an issue ending with 'uuuuh vote I guess'. Like, you can't acknowledge how 'frustrating' it is to be told to 'just vote' and also say we need to be like Republicans while completely blowing past the fact that when Republicans vote they actually get what they want.

Like, he didn't at all touch poo poo like Pelosi saying 'anti-abortion democrats are welcome' and poo poo like Clyburn coming in from out of state to shove his nose in a Texas race to protect an anti-abortion dem from a progressive challenger, and I was wondering why until the end with the 'well maybe we just need to keep voting for the dems' and it was just 'oh, right, when democrats fail us it's them just being too shy to do the right thing and we clearly just need to keep supporting them'.

Sorry but you’re wrong.

They can’t touch on everything. And spent plenty of time calling out dems for being lovely and not keeping promises.

His message was I know voting sucks, I know you hate to hear to keep voting, and that it hasn’t worked well so far, but you loving have to unless you want to be subjugated to a world where birth control is illegal.

Pilfered Pallbearers
Aug 2, 2007

sexpig by night posted:

oops birth control is illegal

We’re a week or so out of a draft leak, roe hasn’t even officially been struck down, and yet…

https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2022/05/08/abortion-tate-reeves-mississippi-contraception/

https://www.businessinsider.com/arizona-gop-senate-candidate-blake-masters-campaigning-against-birth-control-2022-5?amp

https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/republican-states-plot-to-make-birth-control-a-crime-sljmb2s7f

https://www.msnbc.com/msnbc/amp/rcna27922

https://www.salon.com/2022/05/09/arent-even-bothering-to-lie-about-it-anymore-they-are-now-coming-for-birth-control/

https://www.newsweek.com/blackburn-says-scotus-ruling-protect-birth-control-couples-unsound-1690259?amp=1

https://www.azmirror.com/blog/gop-senate-candidate-blake-masters-wants-to-allow-states-to-ban-contraception-use/


Remember when progressives were screaming about Roe being struck down during 2016? And again during the confirmation of Kavanaugh and Barrett? And everyone said they were being hysterical? Back then republicans were talking out of the other side of their mouths about how Roe was settled.

They are not with this. Believe these people when they tell you who they are, considering their default is to lie.

Pilfered Pallbearers
Aug 2, 2007

sexpig by night posted:

we should have voted for democrats to fight this, hosed up those republican bastards control things

https://thehill.com/news/senate/3484601-manchin-to-oppose-democratic-bill-guaranteeing-abortion-access/

ah poo poo

This is a dumb line of argument and you loving know it.

If we had one single additional dem senator, then it would have passed and Republican in all but name Manchin’s vote wouldn’t have mattered. If we had two, kyrsten sinema’s vote wouldn’t matter either.

If we had 10 they could have nuked the filibuster.

Having a 50-50 split where 2 members vote overwhelmingly with the other side is not being in control, it’s barely hanging out.

Pilfered Pallbearers
Aug 2, 2007

Hakkesshu posted:

Bit of a weird topic WRT Uvalde when there was the much more pertinent issue of the actual cops at the school doing jack poo poo and possibly even shooting a child, which wasn't even mentioned. But I guess it was a big topic in the news that people wanted more RSOs?

They don’t really like to make claims they can’t back up.

There’s so much confusion and misinformation from the cops on this topic that the show may be waiting till that shakes down to go ham.

Pilfered Pallbearers
Aug 2, 2007

1glitch0 posted:

They aren't going to actually criticize the cops. That's a bridge to far for this type of show.

Hard disagree.

They explicitly criticize specific cops and general police departments all of the time.

Pilfered Pallbearers
Aug 2, 2007

sexpig by night posted:

I mean, I'm sure this sounds shitposty but no unless the conclusion is 'and that's why we have a judicial, political, and general moral obligation to completely dismantle the american system of policing and replace it with a better one and no amount of political cowardice will change that' then he's coming up pretty short of the actual takeaway to all that. Like, yea, he criticizes that specific guy's class but doesn't seem interested in explaining why that class even exists at all

I feel like you’re watching an entirely different show.

Pilfered Pallbearers
Aug 2, 2007

cant cook creole bream posted:

Because poor people tend to spent the little money they have, rather than hoarding it, or giving it to other rich people who hoard it. If a poor person can afford an extra loaf of bread the baker earns an additional dollar and can spent that somewhere else. Essentially by the acceleration of the monetary cycle more money gets created. But it more money is around, that in turn has less of a value.

Again, I am absolutely not saying that rich people hoarding money is moralistically a good thing. It's just a stronger factor against inflation than using that money.

It's almost as if you've conveniently forgot that all the previous recessions were kicked off with extreme increases in wealth inequality, and IIRC it's income equality is at the worst it's ever been.

https://www.epi.org/blog/fighting-i...ealth%20ladder.

But yes, lets throw more money to the ghouls so they can sit on it and gain 1-2% less on investments while everyone else suffers.

sexpig by night posted:

glad John decided to simultaneously explain why cases are massively undercounted and hard to nail down while also spreading the completely unfounded 'well maybe the queers should stop loving so much' talking point and downplaying the surface and air particulate spread factor. Really rich for him to tut-tut at the right wingers jumping hard on it to do poo poo like spread the 'gay pedophiles' poo poo but also explain it as 'it's mainly affecting men who have sex with men and I guess kinda sorta it can spread other ways' and making sure to say 'it's not homophobic to recognize who's suffering from it' while also saying how impossible it is to loving KNOW who's being affected. Oh well, he got a sick rear end burn on Marjorie Taylor Greene for saying the same thing he was saying about it mainly spreading among gay people.

Also love him just kinda teasingly calling Fauchi 'the Forest Gump of pandemics' and not maybe drawing a link to how he handled AIDS and how the government is handling Monkeypox and all.

God this whole thing was just perfect John Oliver, he got his super sick dunks in but also praised a monkeypox health PSA that exclusively focused on 'wash your fetish gear' and 'stop loving so much, queers' as 'perfect' because a gay politician with a snappy tweet did it.

You somehow consistently have the absolute worst takes in this thread.

John was 100% explicit that it needs to be talked about that the gay community is at the highest risk, and that bigotry in that regard is unacceptable.

In NYC, you must be gay, trans, or bisexual to access the vaccine currently, and it's still incredibly difficult for people in this group to obtain it. This allows resources to flow to the highest risk group, without them having to fight groups that have inherently more privilege, and therefore greater access. This option only exists because NYC is willing to identify them as at risk, without bigotry.

John was clear on all of this as his intent. Just because the right is weaponizing it doesn't mean identifying them as at risk is the same.

Also, praising a PSA for honestly and truthfully explaining the risks of certain behavior without shame is not even close to saying "stop loving so much." It's allowing people to be informed by someone who has the ability to be representative, and to make an honest risk assessment. Without that PSA, people may legitimately not understand the risks they are taking.

It's like you watch the show with the express intent to misunderstand all of the show's points.

Pilfered Pallbearers
Aug 2, 2007

Scholtz posted:

My guess is The Shape of Water.

The Passion (Passin'? Pissin'?) of the Christ would also be funny but I don't think John would do that to a small business

Passion of the Christ in texas would get them firebombed in Texas, and I think the show is aware of this.

It’s going to be something romance or drama related, with a very small chance at a musical. I’d guess a Nicholas sparks movie or sisterhood of the traveling pants or mama Mia.

Pilfered Pallbearers
Aug 2, 2007

Condo or apartment? HOAs are a necessary evil, just be careful.

Private house? gently caress HOAs thank you very much.

Private home HOAs exist so assholes who tut about how other people keep and decorate their houses can actually force those people to confirm to their views.

HOAs for private homes are like abortion rights in republican led states. You think you have rights, until suddenly you don’t and you’re just hosed.

Pilfered Pallbearers
Aug 2, 2007

Xarn posted:

I might be a dirty euro, but why is a playground under the purview of HOA and not the city?

Because in ‘Murica my hard earned tax dollars ain’t gonna fund some socialist playspace for poor kids. They can play in the street or the halls of their section 8 housing.

Pilfered Pallbearers
Aug 2, 2007

cant cook creole bream posted:

Yeah, I had one those kind of Fermi questions in basically every application process.
Of course you can google "How many pigs in China." but that's not the point at all and it's honestly silly for John to suggest that.

What you're supposed to do is to say something like "There are x_1 people in China. A pig gives x_2 usable servings. The average Chinese person would eat x_3 servings a weak so roughly 50*x_3 servings a year. We can assume that all pigs are eventually eaten, so there is a stable amount of pigs around. A pig will take x_4 years to mature to slaughtering age. Given all these factors a reasonable number would be x_1*x_2*50*x_3*x_4."

The actual numbers for those variables are completely irrelevant, but if you try to make vague estimations for them, you will end up on the right ballpark.
Nobody cares for the final number. But the interviewer might note how this answer disregards the effects of import and export of pigs and pork, which might skew the estimation drastically.

McKenzie is an evil company with deplorable opinions and working conditions and I know a few people who ended up working for those assholes. But the fact that their applications sometimes use Fermi questions is a weird point to ridicule.

Honestly, I’d guess it was a creative decision due to lack of content. Their writers room has been proven quite smart and well researched, and I imagine they were fully aware of why those questions are asked.

With such little public, verifiable (this is important) information on McKenzie, they probably had been far enough along in the episode progress where they couldn’t not make the episode before they ran outta jokes that fit the tone of the show and needed to fill time or funny bits.

I’d also assume McKenzie is extremely sue-happy over non-public information, because whenever John brings out the “my lawyers told me” line that’s usually the reason. Combo of that, plus minimal public information and people unlikely to go on record in Court over private information gives them a lot of stuff they probably had to cut.

Pilfered Pallbearers
Aug 2, 2007

Watermelon Daiquiri posted:

They just posted this chuck-e-cheese segment yesterday-- https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3v6y2pY1pZ0 didn't they already post this? I remember watching it before

Yeah just not on YouTube. It was the day the HOA episode aired

Pilfered Pallbearers
Aug 2, 2007

Jerusalem posted:

I knew student loans in America in particular were bad, but holy poo poo :stare:

The reveal that of the 2 million people who had signed up for the plan that forgives your loan after 10 years of public service, 99% had been rejected when they hit 10 years and requested their loan be dismissed was just batshit insane.

My mother in law was one of those people. She had applied twice and been denied (parent plus loan too).

After a lot of work, I convinced her to apply again once Biden announced the new changes, and it was accepted and zeroed out. Like $50k of loans gone in a flash. It was exactly as they described on the show. Paying for over 10 years, never missed a payment, the balance had only gone down $2000 despite a ~$500 monthly.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Pilfered Pallbearers
Aug 2, 2007

Rappaport posted:

The death penalty journalism stirring up poo poo was excellent (if horrifying), but the end funny bit was fantastic. They find the weirdest ways of burning HBO money in a furnace.

I wish they did stuff like that more. It’s genuinely where the show shines, and it hits almost every time.

The gently caress rats saga, the secret commercial scripts, the waste management plant, etc etc etc.

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • Post
  • Reply