Gunshow Poophole posted:

where's our well heeled titled but eccentric genius British lord to get the administration out of this bind??

bird with big dick posted:

I spent all night tweeting at these guys to settle down or the US was going to nuke both of them and I think I got through to them.

Zeroisanumber posted:

India still flies MIG-21's? Those things are ancient.

Darkman Fanpage posted:

Grand Theft Autobot posted:

One of those GOOD MORNING Indian meme things but with a mushroom cloud.

StashAugustine posted:

It rules how quickly actual events are converging on Starship Troopers

Pener Kropoopkin posted:

#SayYesToPeoplesWar #JaiNaxal

Charles 2 of Spain posted:

Sir Jadeja fans are 100% Hindu chuds.

Mariana Horchata posted:

quote:

Impressed by Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s triumph in the recent parliamentary election, a Muslim woman named her newborn son after him, sparking a variety of reactions among political groups and people online.

A woman from Uttar Pradesh, a northern Indian state with a large Muslim population, filed papers to have her newborn son registered as Narendra Damodardas Modi on Friday, local media reported. The child was born on May 23, the same day the final votes were counted and the mother, Mainaz Begum, heard the news of Modi’s crushing victory over the opposition.

“I want my son to do good work like Modi and become as successful as him,” the woman told ANI.

Xelkelvos posted:

It's the same with Filipinos in the US and Duterte.

get that OUT of my face posted:

India could have used their economic potential to be an economic superpower. why are they so content to be the crown jewel of neoliberal globalization instead?

Jose posted:

If India and Pakistan did decide to lob nukes at each other would the rest of the world just wait until it was over?

quote:

A “limited” nuclear war involving only 100 Hiroshima-sized bombs (i.e. of 13 kilotons each), which is less than 0.5 percent of the world’s nuclear weapons, could disrupt the global climate. More than 5 million tonnes of soot from fires in urban and industrial areas targeted by these weapons could be lofted into the upper atmosphere and cause global temperatures to fall by an average of 1.3 C for several years, shortening the growing season in many areas. The drop in temperatures would be much more severe inland, especially in the interior of North America and Eurasia. The cooler temperatures would result in a major decline in precipitation, as less water evaporates from the oceans to fall back as rain and snow. In addition, there would be a large reduction in ozone levels in the upper atmosphere, allowing increased levels of harmful ultraviolet (UV) light to reach the earth’s surface. The cooler weather, shorter growing seasons and decline in precipitation would have severe effects on agriculture. For example, it is estimated that soybean and corn production in the Midwestern United States and rice production in China would be 20 percent lower in the years immediately following the event, and 10 percent lower even after a decade

More than one billion people around the world might face starvation as a result of a limited, regional nuclear war. The world is ill-prepared to deal with a decline in food production. World food reserves cover only 60 to 70 days of consumption. In addition, there are currently some 870 million malnourished people in the world, who do not receive the minimum of 1,800 calories per day that are required to maintain body mass and perform the physical labour necessary to gather or grow food. A reduction in food intake of as little as 10 percent for a full decade would put this entire group at risk. The estimated 10 to 20 percent drop in corn and maize production could easily translate into a much larger decline in access to food because hoarding and panic are likely to drive up market prices, thereby making food unaffordable for many people. Furthermore, more than 300 million people in the world are well-nourished today but live in countries that are highly dependent on food imports. They too would be at risk if food-exporting countries halted exports to feed their own people.

Spergin Morlock posted:

I like the part where the vx is released and the people nearby immediately blister and melt.

Grapplejack posted:

The UNSC is going to meet about Kashmir, and China is heavily on Pakistan's side. I'm honestly not sure anyone is going to side with India; I think even Trump remembers the tariffs India slapped against the US like, two months ago.

pancake rabbit posted:

according to this, yeah basically

https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/no-first-use-of-nukes-policy-is-open-to-review-rajnath/articleshow/70707921.cms?from=mdr

Failson posted:

Nothing to see here, just Pakistan's railway minister threatening India with tactical nukes.

https://www.indiatvnews.com/amp/news/world-pakistan-minister-claims-n-bomb-546733