|
SickZip posted:For years, I've been posting about Mueller literally being accused by other FBI agents of killing any investigation into the 9/11 hijackers ties to the Saudi government and had it ignored or called a conspiracy theory. Cannot wait to finally hear about it from news media talking heads who suddenly think its relevant for some reason. lol dude, they were already asking about it: https://www.heraldtribune.com/news/20180910/anderson-did-mueller-mislead-public-about-911 This is about the Florida Bulldog article with the "unnamed FBI source", right? The original bulldog article claimed that there were phone records between the parties, but the FOI request itself disputes that (at the bottom): http://www.floridabulldog.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/09/FBI-RECORD-RELEASE.pdf Seems like the only link was that one of the "family members" was a student of the same flight school as some of the attackers. (I don't think it says if they were there at the same time) if you have better sources, please post them.
|
#
¿
Mar 26, 2019 18:26
|
|
|
|
| # ¿ May 10, 2024 03:54 |
|
|
Helsing posted:This is true but not in the way the Russiagaters thought it would be. The 'extent' of the Internet Research Agency's activities were completely incommensurate with the feverish claims that were relentlessly broadcast in the media. The alleged hack of the DNC would have been at least theoretically consequential to the election but since federal authorities were never even given access to the hacked server all we have to go on as far as attributions go are the statements of a private firm with a financial interest in appeasing the DNC and a noted track record of screwing up previous cyber attributions. We're left with at best a circumstantially coherent account that people now treat as proven fact. First of all, it's servers It does not seem like you know what you are talking about. https://www.thedailybeast.com/trumps-missing-dnc-server-is-neither-missing-nor-a-server It's fairly standard in IT-forensics to take images of the affected servers as it's very common for intruders to hide their traces after they're done. IIRC the Mueller indictments had actual searches/keystrokes from the GRU officers who hacked the DNC network, I believe that Crowdstrike would not have the ability to get that information, so Mueller did his own research into the matter, it's not just about what Crowdstrike provided. For example, from the indictments: quote:On or about June 15, 2016, the Conspirators logged into a Moscow—based server used and managed by Unit74455 and, between 4:19PM and 4:56PM Moscow Standard Time, searched for certain words and phrases, including: There is no way Crowdstrike could provide this kind of information. but ofc the indictments aren't reliable and muellermanbad! 
|
|
#
¿
Aug 12, 2019 09:42
|
|