|
idk maybe they use a combination of classifying sites themselves (keywords) and images (some dumb nn) and then some threshold? ive seen porn go through a couple times.
|
# ¿ Sep 13, 2019 18:09 |
|
|
# ¿ May 10, 2024 06:21 |
|
akadajet posted:I thought you could almost always find porn if you keep scrolling down the results. probably? this was like page 1-2 of some image search
|
# ¿ Sep 14, 2019 00:43 |
|
rofl
|
# ¿ Sep 18, 2019 23:28 |
|
yeah sure, a statistical model of the solar system is a pretty good predictor for eclipses. thats kindof what we've had since millennia (more or less successfully) idgi, whats his point?
|
# ¿ Sep 28, 2019 08:48 |
|
i loving love science
|
# ¿ Oct 11, 2019 04:37 |
|
should have asked him for his fukushima code imo
|
# ¿ Oct 26, 2019 07:59 |
|
akadajet posted:when these drivers hit 88+ you're going to see some serious poo poo great scott!
|
# ¿ Nov 9, 2019 04:36 |
|
Sagebrush posted:it's unambiguous in america too bc nobody in america uses permille. oh look at me using a fancy different unit that looks almost the same as one 10x larger instead of just adding a zero to the figure. this won't be confusing. like if you had millimeters and rnillimeters (100 microns), abbreviated mm and rnm using the fancy symbol is literally adding a zero to it i use permille in any context all the time because saying .4 percent is crazy, just say 4 permille.
|
# ¿ Nov 13, 2019 06:00 |
|
that's will happen anyway. stupid gonna stupid
|
# ¿ Nov 13, 2019 09:10 |
|
rofl
|
# ¿ Nov 25, 2019 17:53 |
|
hosed up if true
|
# ¿ Nov 28, 2019 13:21 |
|
AI caramba
|
# ¿ Nov 29, 2019 02:20 |
|
Fanged Lawn Wormy posted:is fortran the one u have to dress as a cyber gladiator for? dont forget the huge boner
|
# ¿ Dec 5, 2019 15:36 |
|
|
# ¿ Dec 6, 2019 05:17 |
|
looking at that cover again, i wonder what kind of facial hair e. floegel had
|
# ¿ Dec 13, 2019 22:54 |
|
Cybernetic Vermin posted:that's surely the horniest stack programming in particular has ever been horny & stacked programmers???
|
# ¿ Dec 13, 2019 23:15 |
|
could be based on imperical observation & adjustment, ie tweak the nn input until you get the desired output
|
# ¿ Dec 15, 2019 08:42 |
|
this guy might be a dumbass https://twitter.com/Bschulz5/status/1202631062410674176
|
# ¿ Jan 3, 2020 03:18 |
|
echinopsis posted:I'll show you my confidence interval planck time, huh
|
# ¿ Feb 2, 2020 11:05 |
|
my weeder course was having to show up
|
# ¿ Mar 27, 2020 17:18 |
|
ultrafilter posted:No one in statistics is saying that. coulda fooled me
|
# ¿ Jun 17, 2020 00:48 |
|
Midjack posted:or if not crime rates, kidney stones and urinary tract infections? cool country
|
# ¿ Jun 17, 2020 22:40 |
|
why are they all making the weird orgasm meme face
|
# ¿ Jun 25, 2020 19:42 |
|
loaded dice but you don't know how they're loaded
|
# ¿ Jul 14, 2020 14:59 |
|
yea that sure sounds scary but on the other hand, every other industry also had guns and drugs & yet they still became unemployed
|
# ¿ Jul 18, 2020 04:38 |
|
jfc
|
# ¿ Jul 27, 2020 20:53 |
|
Sleng Teng posted:Dunno wtf "the team is working on separating the concepts of name/username/email from gender identity" youre the ones putting a gender identity on my email in the first place!!!
|
# ¿ Jul 28, 2020 20:23 |
|
400 X chromosomes ought to be enough for anybody
|
# ¿ Jul 29, 2020 09:37 |
|
training a tank with starcraft AI is some tesla-tier bullshit
|
# ¿ Jul 29, 2020 17:17 |
|
leper khan posted:I joined the ML group in a non-ML driven org (doing things that aren't ML) and the product people keep asking me for ideas on what we can use ML to solve. make a webpage that says "gently caress you" louder the more recently you visited it see how long it takes for them to catch on
|
# ¿ Aug 7, 2020 22:45 |
|
50.1% is pretty much fully confident. that cat is a shapeshifting 50/50 herpes/covid-19 mimic prokaryote elon voice: "i say we nuke it from orbit" *ch-chunk whirrrrr*
|
# ¿ Aug 7, 2020 23:16 |
|
what like expert systems
|
# ¿ Aug 9, 2020 01:19 |
|
mystes posted:Since coronavirus has also disrupted the market economy, rather than actually having companies provide goods and services, what if we just use an ai model to predict what goods and services people would have bought and then give all the money to the richest 1%? gently caress it why not, makes number go up right
|
# ¿ Aug 22, 2020 00:29 |
|
lliitteerraallyy
|
# ¿ Sep 3, 2020 20:40 |
|
wow
|
# ¿ Sep 20, 2020 17:23 |
|
good grief
|
# ¿ Sep 25, 2020 06:04 |
|
imo big data people shouldnt survive unless they post in yospos, because then they are already dead
|
# ¿ Sep 25, 2020 16:41 |
|
not gonna read it, but from the illustration it just looks like the test subjects went oh hey that guy is smiling *click :like: button*
Carthag Tuek fucked around with this message at 17:09 on Sep 25, 2020 |
# ¿ Sep 25, 2020 17:07 |
|
qirex posted:also classical portraits seems like the worst possible training set since they were usually done specifically to make the patron look awesome and their enemies look shady yeah, capital p Portraits arent naturalistic, not then, not now. they all have a message. i guess theres value in examining what that message is and how it has changed through history, but thats not a job for machine learning lol
|
# ¿ Sep 25, 2020 17:09 |
|
|
# ¿ May 10, 2024 06:21 |
|
ultrafilter posted:If I were an art historian I'd probably have a lot to say about this but as is I'm just withholding judgment until the actual experts weigh in. sounds like theyre evaluating historical and contemporary portraits based on whatever the current model of "trustworthiness" says, ie they show that the common styles of portraits indeed change from historical styles towards the contemporary styles, and that the current model considers historical portraits less trustworthy, whatever that menas im tired
|
# ¿ Sep 25, 2020 17:13 |