Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
 
  • Post
  • Reply
Schwarzwald
Jul 27, 2004

Don't Blink
So Fast X was kind of mid, huh?

Some good action (of course) but it's a bad sign if you walk out of a movie reminiscing on the tighter told storytelling of Fast 9.

Schwarzwald fucked around with this message at 01:21 on Jun 11, 2023

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Schwarzwald
Jul 27, 2004

Don't Blink

Cream-of-Plenty posted:

According to scientists, those two Chargers would need a combined ~198,000 horsepower to pull that (canonically) 10-ton vault like they did--and realistically, a vault that size is 8 or 10 times heavier. If that doesn't sell Chargers I don't know what will

I mean, there's also a lot of "movie magic" going on in those scenes you're not going to pick up on from just watching the movie.

For example, the film techs almost certainly lubed that safe to hell, which would have reduced the friction from it dragging on the road and drastically reducing the number of horsepower those chargers needed to deliver.

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • Post
  • Reply