|
Copchat is being detained and will be placed here for the safety of the rest of the subforum. Do not resist. And this not open season for shitposting. You wanna do copchat? Do it properly. Use your loving words. McNally fucked around with this message at 03:10 on Jul 2, 2019 |
# ¿ Jul 2, 2019 03:08 |
|
|
# ¿ May 10, 2024 19:02 |
|
Just in case you didn't see the edit to the OP, this is not a consequence-free environment.
|
# ¿ Jul 2, 2019 03:12 |
|
Please don't fill the thread with snuff.
|
# ¿ Jul 11, 2019 22:18 |
|
Kawasaki Nun posted:what the gently caress does arming the "middle class" accomplish? The working class is not the middle class.
|
# ¿ Jul 12, 2019 04:20 |
|
Kawasaki Nun posted:bad quote but yeah, what does arming the working class accomplish? They have access to guns now and they are getting hosed worse than ever It works within the context of a marxist uprising which is what i think Prof Bling was going for. Outside that context not so much.
|
# ¿ Jul 12, 2019 04:36 |
|
Steezo posted:Or when the clan is engaging in a voter suppression bombing campaign, or the local sheriff is beating poll watchers and stealing ballot boxes to protect incumbents. Yep. Duh me.
|
# ¿ Jul 12, 2019 19:35 |
|
AreWeDrunkYet posted:Isn't the klan an example of an "armed working class" itself though? Not that klan leadership wasn't almost completely overlapping with the political leadership of that area, but plenty of the rank and file were/are just blue collar racists. More class traitors since they were working to suppress other members of the working class.
|
# ¿ Jul 12, 2019 19:48 |
|
pantslesswithwolves posted:Professor Bling, is there any reply from one of the few cops here beyond “Golly Gee, you’re right, I’ll suck start my service weapon before the end of my shift!” that would satisfy you, or what? It’s one thing to be rightfully and seriously skeptical about policing in the US because there’s a ton of hosed up and reprehensible poo poo that happens, but your response to anyone else is just the same ACAB shtick. Is there anything else that could actually change your mind? Hey, Professor Bling, I think you missed this post. Answer the question.
|
# ¿ Aug 1, 2019 19:16 |
|
Professor Bling posted:Sure. I'll take my time and write out something reasoned since I'm falling back into angry yelling again. You have until 2 PM Eastern tomorrow.
|
# ¿ Aug 3, 2019 00:11 |
|
Professor Bling posted:Well the CE thread got closed because apparently we're not allowed to disagree with banning guns? so why not talk about it here instead, since it seems like another topic mods don't want to deal with Did I say "don't talk about this" or did I say "let's take a break?" People were winding up a poster who was still able to articulate his argument while clearly being emotional about it, which is something you've never been able to figure out. It was that or a carpet bombing. Weird how you're only okay with less collateral damage when it benefits you.
|
# ¿ Aug 4, 2019 20:21 |
|
Professor Bling posted:Maybe articulating this somewhere other than the discord would be a good idea, then, eh? Bloo bloo bloo McNally's being mean to me.
|
# ¿ Aug 4, 2019 20:28 |
|
Professor Bling posted:That's... not the point of that post? Then why even bring up the "follow-up personal attack?"
|
# ¿ Aug 4, 2019 20:30 |
|
So I took a break. Had something to eat. Professor Bling, I owe you an apology. You were being completely reasonable here and I was being a jackass. I'm sorry about that. Yes, absolutely, I should have articulated my reason for closing the CE thread. I take the forum/discord overlap for granted and I need to be more mindful that what I say in there isn't available to everybody. And then I cranked my assholery to 11.
|
# ¿ Aug 4, 2019 20:56 |
|
Chichevache posted:Telling other posters they should die is pretty lovely. I think he was making reference to TwoFing's unfortunate experience with marine generators rather than telling him to fry himself on a generator.
|
# ¿ Aug 4, 2019 21:51 |
|
Just report the posts and I'll deal with it.
|
# ¿ Aug 5, 2019 05:02 |
|
As a reminder, this thread is to prevent copchat from making GBS threads up the rest of the forum. It is not an unmoderated cesspit.
|
# ¿ Aug 8, 2019 23:00 |
|
Yeah, I misread the post. My bad, man.
|
# ¿ Aug 10, 2019 05:57 |
|
Stravag posted:Stop being rascist. Any color rope can fix a cop problem Dial back on comments like this please.
|
# ¿ Sep 19, 2019 22:32 |
|
Professor Bling posted:Fixed that for you Remember when I said on this very page to dial back poo poo like this?
|
# ¿ Sep 25, 2019 18:44 |
|
"Better" would start with not being a disingenuous little poo poo.
|
# ¿ Sep 25, 2019 19:08 |
|
Stravag posted:Is cool im back in genpop and will remain the hero cops need right now. You're on thin ice, don't push it.
|
# ¿ Sep 29, 2019 19:00 |
|
Proud Christian Mom posted:The front door was unlocked. She walked in, saw a black guy sitting on the couch eating ice cream, smoked him, and then called her partner(who she was about to go gently caress(he's also married)) asking what to do. Goddamnit, I'm not going to stand for this kind of lovely posting. You don't double up on parentheses. If you have a parenthetical within your parenthetical, you use brackets.
|
# ¿ Sep 30, 2019 22:22 |
|
Stravag posted:If it would be a triple parenthical do we use number signs or parenthesis again inside the bracket? A triple parenthetical is an anti-semitic dogwhistle and will get you banned.
|
# ¿ Sep 30, 2019 22:27 |
|
Stravag posted:I am suddenly fascinated by a rabbithole i didnt even know existed but suddentl find myself teetering on the edge of. Quad parentheticals? Pentas? DECAS?! Honestly, I can only imagine that any of the style guides would say that if you're using triple parentheticals (or more) in one sentence, your sentence structure is hosed up beyond belief.
|
# ¿ Sep 30, 2019 22:32 |
|
Stravag posted:Im just imagining the hilariously indepth technical explanation of some insanely complex piece of machinery and by the time you get 10 levels deep its been pushed to the level of (thing make go) Oh, technical writing is its own strange creature.
|
# ¿ Sep 30, 2019 22:38 |
|
Kawasaki Nun posted:Nevermind. I read she's being sentenced between 5-99 so it looks like she's on the hook for Murder one. She probably intended to commit murder when she did absolutely nothing to help after she shot him.
|
# ¿ Oct 1, 2019 19:24 |
|
"We encourage those leaders to be mindful because their words may jeapordize (sic) the integrity of the city of Dallas and DPD" reads like being told "be careful what you say, for your own safety" accompanied by a hard stare.
|
# ¿ Oct 11, 2019 23:13 |
|
Chichevache posted:It does if you work from the assumption that they planned a murder to protect one of their own. If you dont think that then it sounds like they're trying real hard to keep the peace and they're worried that people pushing conspiracy theories without evidence are going to make it hard to do that. I mean, it works equally well if you don't think that they planned a murder but are complicit in covering one up.
|
# ¿ Oct 11, 2019 23:19 |
|
mlmp08 posted:It says their words may jeopardize the integrity of the PD. In fairness, I think this ascribes more competence with the English language than the person who misspelled "jeopardize" possesses.
|
# ¿ Oct 11, 2019 23:25 |
|
Chichevache posted:So you're going with the "cops intentionally made this threat" interpretation instead of the "whichever moron was too fat to work the street and got stuck on social media duty cant write good" interpretation? Why can't it be both? You can still argue "if you know what's good for you you'll be quiet about this" is a valid reading of the tweet AND say "wow, way to wordsmith that tweet guys"
|
# ¿ Oct 11, 2019 23:27 |
|
So basically our options are "too incompetent to not voice a threat publicly" or "too incompetent to wordsmith a statement that doesn't sound like a threat." I'm seeing a pattern here.
|
# ¿ Oct 12, 2019 21:08 |
|
bird cooch posted:Or they found it in the bedside table in the bedroom far far away from the person. This was my assumption too
|
# ¿ Oct 12, 2019 23:06 |
|
Doc Hawkins posted:this seems like a great example of gunpower: that someone had a gun is ventured as a justification for a cop killing them with a gun. this is offensive from an abstract perspective of a right to bear arms, but makes perfect sense if you feel the purpose of that right, and of guns themselves, is to enforce our society's current hierarchy. in that light, it is natural for police (and men and white folks in general) to order, threaten, and kill people within their socially recognized area of control (a "beat," an ethnically privilehed neighborhood, a house, etc). Your writing style is very evocative of a crazy uncle who ever says things that are correct by accident.
|
# ¿ Oct 12, 2019 23:41 |
|
Jesus loving Christ your goddamned av
|
# ¿ Oct 14, 2019 22:52 |
|
Victor Vermis posted:WHAT DID YOU DO People were getting motion sickness from your old av.
|
# ¿ Oct 16, 2019 20:51 |
|
Victor Vermis posted:Sorry for the ableist art, gang. I'd PM you about this but EBB thinks it's hilarious to tax low-income earners for using folksy GIP memes in the Drunk Thread. You were banned for using homophobic slurs you disingenuous gently caress.
|
# ¿ Oct 16, 2019 21:20 |
|
Hey, here's a crazy loving idea: Don't make loving jokes about loving suicide.
|
# ¿ Oct 19, 2019 07:26 |
|
I've been told that I'm not doing enough to make people aware, so in the spirit of GIP I'm going to wildly overreact and post this same message in all the active threads. Another run of Useless Dirt shirts is being put together. Deadline to order is 11:59 PM Eastern time tomorrow. Info is here
|
# ¿ Nov 17, 2019 20:13 |
|
Stravag posted:Yeah you tie it around their wrists and then they cant reach their gun and shoot people and dangle from a tree so people can throw tomatoes at them. Last i knew you dont die from tomatoes Nobody's buying it. Stop being a disingenuous gently caress.
|
# ¿ Nov 20, 2019 02:45 |
|
|
# ¿ May 10, 2024 19:02 |
|
https://twitter.com/MiramarPD/status/1202731182720458752?s=20 Thankfully their use of civilians as ablative armor has paid off.
|
# ¿ Dec 6, 2019 04:10 |