|
Someone knock me out until a GE is called, I can't loving cope with another month of wondering when the slight chance of getting a mildly socialist government is going to be flushed away somehow
|
#
¿
Oct 1, 2019 00:11
|
|
|
|
| # ¿ May 10, 2024 14:56 |
|
|
Happy birthday Ms A! Re: parliament, it's urgent questions (today about shorting the pound), and working on uncontroversial legislation
|
|
#
¿
Oct 1, 2019 02:45
|
|
|
A far better objection is that the electorate didn't vote for PM Harriet loving Harman or whoever, so it just looks like MPs ignoring people again
|
|
#
¿
Oct 1, 2019 13:59
|
|
|
WhatEvil posted:Just want you to know that even though I rarely post in appreciation of these, I *always* appreciate them and I'm sure there are others who are the same too. Someone please explain to me like I'm very dumb. Lib Dems land on the left? Is the shape of the tree important? What is happening
|
|
#
¿
Oct 1, 2019 16:56
|
|
|
Sufficiently funny that I still laughed after needing it explaining to me three times
|
|
#
¿
Oct 1, 2019 17:04
|
|
|
Azza Bamboo posted:My finished pieces always lose a bit of the character of the lazy doodles This is really good, and the tree logo is super obvious when it's inked so you can be reassured that even dipshits like me will get it.
|
|
#
¿
Oct 1, 2019 18:38
|
|
|
I love that people have these tweets from 2015 on speed dial
|
|
#
¿
Oct 1, 2019 22:34
|
|
|
JeremoudCorbynejad posted:Not pictured: his thigh printed down the handle of the mug Only revealed when you add hot liquid
|
|
#
¿
Oct 2, 2019 08:14
|
|
|
squirrelzipper posted:Hi. Canadian lurker poljunkie checking in. What’s the point at which Labour would have to think about changing leadership? Or is just a matter of enduring until the Torres immolate? If Labour don't form a government after the next election, of course the knives will be out from the same shower of shite that initiated the chicken coup. Membership love Corbs though, so they'd need a clear successor to vote for anyone else.
|
|
#
¿
Oct 2, 2019 08:37
|
|
|
I dream of the day that the tag team combo of Jezza + Meghan Markle demolish our terrible media institutions
|
|
#
¿
Oct 2, 2019 11:16
|
|
|
The internet was a horrible mistake
|
|
#
¿
Oct 2, 2019 11:37
|
|
|
blunt posted:Though I'm sure the Lib Dems would oppose. Of course they would. They want to seed a leadership contest in Labour. Can't do that without making another Labour MP the PM
|
|
#
¿
Oct 2, 2019 12:01
|
|
|
HJB posted:Also I'm enjoying the Guardian live blogger bringing us the Johnson speech in shitpost format: They said they got the speech ahead of time, and Johnson doesn't punctuate
|
|
#
¿
Oct 2, 2019 12:16
|
|
|
Someone on twitter posted about the questions that can lead up to them asking about preference for PM in polls, and they are absolutely designed to get you angry about specific poo poo beforehand
|
|
#
¿
Oct 2, 2019 12:36
|
|
|
Just perfectly normal climate variations, nothing to worry about, the dinosaurs died out and they didn't have cars or factories
|
|
#
¿
Oct 2, 2019 12:40
|
|
|
Just calling this list of landlines at 10am on a Monday to get a highly representative sample of voters
|
|
#
¿
Oct 2, 2019 12:43
|
|
|
Would Leveson 2 be sufficient press regulation, should we get a Labour government, or do folks think it needs to go further?
|
|
#
¿
Oct 2, 2019 13:16
|
|
|
mediaphage posted:Yes, despite what the internet thinks, mobile phones get called, too. In part because some of these dialers work by using a list of auto generated phone numbers, not actually a list from someplace. The point still stands though. How many working people can answer their personal phone during office hours? You can't if you work in retail, you can't at most call centres.
|
|
#
¿
Oct 2, 2019 14:22
|
|
|
I'm going to try to go to our next local canvassing meeting, but last time I tried I had a panic attack at my own front door and blacked out so who knows Makes me feel like poo poo that I can't get out there and help
|
|
#
¿
Oct 3, 2019 05:04
|
|
|
Yeah, that's the main thrust of the next meeting which is why I'm going to try again. e: catte 
Tarnop fucked around with this message at 05:11 on Oct 3, 2019 |
|
#
¿
Oct 3, 2019 05:08
|
|
|
I've emailed my CLP campaign organiser to see if there's anything else I can do, cheers all
|
|
#
¿
Oct 3, 2019 09:09
|
|
|
Let's not forget that every time in the last month we thought the Tories had a cunning plan, 24 hours later we were laughing at what a dipshit Dom Cummies is
|
|
#
¿
Oct 3, 2019 09:42
|
|
|
Good to see the union effort in games showing it has teeth. Management in the industry was a loving cesspit 10 years ago in my experience, and it certainly doesn't sound like it's got much better. I'm pleased that workers have someone fighting their corner.
|
|
#
¿
Oct 3, 2019 10:52
|
|
|
NotJustANumber99 posted:An aggressive response. Maybe this kind of protest is fomenting otherwise apathetic attention? LIke I said I was judging climate action on its results. Not that I dunno some dudes were well respected legal law people. Very strange that people criticise XR for being too compliant and then worry they haven't got the best legal advice? The best legal advice is to not be too compliant. Maybe if you actually read the posts in this thread then you would be able to converse like less of a loving moron.
|
|
#
¿
Oct 8, 2019 04:02
|
|
|
Munin posted:Yes on that count but of course the article doesn't focus on her and frames the entire thing in the worst light possible. The population of female MPs that have been up for reselection this time round is tiny, so it's hard to draw meaningful conclusions. However, if misogyny was the driving force here then you'd expect to also see a proportional number of leftist/pro-Corbyn women being triggered for reselection. It also overlooks the fact that a female labour MP triggered for reselection will have an all female nomination list in the selection ballot, by party rules. e: there were also more women than men who endorsed Owen Smith, so if that is a motivator for reselection then you'd expect to see that represented Tarnop fucked around with this message at 05:21 on Oct 8, 2019 |
|
#
¿
Oct 8, 2019 05:16
|
|
|
CGI Stardust posted:what's the discord invite? the OP invite is out of date https://discord.gg/YRwDQJq
|
|
#
¿
Oct 11, 2019 18:52
|
|
|
  
Tarnop fucked around with this message at 22:28 on Oct 12, 2019 |
|
#
¿
Oct 12, 2019 22:22
|
|
|
Azza Bamboo posted:I demand larger screenshots. Phone does a good job of hiding the fact that you're working with 1080 tweet grabs
|
|
#
¿
Oct 12, 2019 22:30
|
|
|
No see she said "genuine" anti-racists
|
|
#
¿
Oct 12, 2019 22:50
|
|
|
You are very good
|
|
#
¿
Oct 12, 2019 23:31
|
|
|
ThomasPaine posted:not to mention their kids This is an important aspect, especially for the upper middle classes. No one except the ultra rich will have any kind of legacy.
|
|
#
¿
Oct 13, 2019 00:28
|
|
|
e: gently caress, I'd convinced myself that was true, but then I dug out the leaflet and it's about as melty as I'd expect from a chicken-coup coward who voted to bomb Syria.  Of course, you could interpret this as never voting for a Tory deal, because lol at the idea of Boris even knowing that Halifax exists. Tarnop fucked around with this message at 07:50 on Oct 13, 2019 |
|
#
¿
Oct 13, 2019 07:40
|
|
|
Sanitary Naptime posted:Manchester goons, please help. Sounds like Home Sweet Home maybe
|
|
#
¿
Oct 13, 2019 23:29
|
|
|
 
|
|
#
¿
Oct 14, 2019 17:43
|
|
|
HauntedRobot posted:Personally this thread is keeping me sane... what with the rational opinion-havers in my area it's just loving nice to know that other people are, indeed, "seeing this poo poo" whether we're talking about politics or crisps. And I've learned a lot. 
|
|
#
¿
Oct 14, 2019 19:04
|
|
|
Julio Cruz posted:that's funny because it certainly didn't come to an abrupt end during the state opening of parliament If there's something interesting to say about that then please, go ahead and say it.
|
|
#
¿
Oct 14, 2019 19:44
|
|
|
Julio Cruz posted:maybe you shouldn't post if you don't have a positive contribution to make So you don't have a single interesting thing to say about anything that's happened today, you just want other people to entertain you.
|
|
#
¿
Oct 14, 2019 19:47
|
|
|
Julio Cruz posted:lots of people posted interesting things that were relevant to today, they just all got lost in the morass of "hurrrr monster munch" But instead of responding to those people, you're whining about crisps
|
|
#
¿
Oct 14, 2019 19:57
|
|
|
spiderbot posted:Earlier someone posted a tweet from someone saying 'we need a british Bernie Sanders', but rejecting Corbyn as not being the same thing. Why is that? Is it because Sanders is still relatively unknown, so people can project their own image onto him, or maybe they like the idea of progressive politics as long as it's something that happens on the other side of the atlantic. Will we see the same monstering of Bernie as we got with Corbyn if he looks like he might actually win? Noel Fielding is a huge melt, and Bernie winning won't mean he has to pay more tax on his hard-earned bake off money
|
|
#
¿
Oct 14, 2019 19:59
|
|
|
|
| # ¿ May 10, 2024 14:56 |
|
|
I'm enjoying your new vision for the thread
|
|
#
¿
Oct 14, 2019 20:03
|
|