Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
 
  • Post
  • Reply
Notorious b.s.d.
Jan 25, 2003

by Reene
now that rms is out of the picture i hope we get full llvm/lldb support in emacs

or get gcc to have a sane intermediate format so that good things can be done with gcc and emacs

i don't really care, i just want better c++ integration in emacs

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Notorious b.s.d.
Jan 25, 2003

by Reene
rms has been the sticking point on both fixing up gcc's intermediate format (which has historically been deliberately unuseable by outside tools) and integrating llvm support into emacs (because llvm isn't as fully free as gcc)

i don't care which sticking point gets un-stuck, i have no real preference here, i just want c++ to not-suck in emacs

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • Post
  • Reply