|
I'm the kind who hates those that complain about opportunists/revisionists/or whatever when they're clearly not doing anything either. Or when they are doing something, it's meaningless and masterbatory. I don't care what you are just do something. Or at least don't poo poo on those doing things themselves for not 100% following your God given plan. We can argue about all this bullshit later. BrokenGameboy has issued a correction as of 14:37 on Dec 25, 2019 |
#
¿
Dec 25, 2019 14:35
|
|
|
|
| # ¿ May 21, 2024 05:51 |
|
|
Doesn't matter what kind of Marxist or socialist you are if you continue to have an insignificant impact on people's lives. And it doesn't matter if it worked historically unless it works now.
|
|
#
¿
Dec 25, 2019 18:35
|
|
|
In my experience and research, Anarchists and Marxists agree on 99% of everything, but just pretend that they don't. The worst in my experience being that they both mean different things when they use the word "state".
|
|
#
¿
Dec 26, 2019 06:32
|
|
|
Ardennes posted:The concept of a highly centralized state (i.e Leninism) may be a slight difference between the two... What I meant is that a theoretical ancom society would fit perfectly into the Marxist definition of a state since it would repress the capital class in favor of the working class. The anarchist definition of a state is more vauge, but usually means a society of top down power. Hilariously, these differences end up with them arguing with each other while also talking about two different things. Side note. I feel stupid, but I just realized I don't know what it means for a state to be centralized. Someone help me out here. BrokenGameboy has issued a correction as of 11:03 on Dec 27, 2019 |
|
#
¿
Dec 27, 2019 09:33
|
|
|
Would this explanation of council democracy count as centralized then? Since there's a top council that's determined from the lower councils. https://youtu.be/byqOHE-37og
|
|
#
¿
Dec 27, 2019 10:28
|
|